Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 4977.TW PCL Technologies, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

PCL Technologies, Inc.4977.TWCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Information Technology›Semiconductors
Momentum leader 90
Mkt cap
$454M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
84%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$46.3M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
60.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-5.5 pp
WACC 6.5%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
11 days
17 Nov 2026
Close · TWDNT$165.00
1D-6.0%
1W-4.6%
1M-5.7%
3M+54.9%
6M-22.5%
YTD+16.2%
1Y+46.0%
ATR %8.7%
52w lowhigh39.6% off high

What PCL Technologies does

No business profile yet.

PCL Technologies at a glance

Size PCL Technologies (4977.TW) is a Taiwan Information Technology company (Semiconductors) with a market value of $454M, the 477th largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$165.00 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 22.5%, against -20.2% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — 10th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 25.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +17.1%); the operating margin is 2.3% (peer median 2.1%).

Valuation It trades at 60.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 12.7× (2nd most expensive of 11).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 5.5 points below its cost of capital (6.5% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 17 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

507510012511 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20264977.TW 78Peer median 77
Six months, rebased to 100: PCL Technologies against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

PCL Technologies financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNT$962MNT$1.07BNT$1.09BNT$1.74BNT$2.97B
Revenue growth—-2%-37%-41%—
Gross profitNT$216MNT$250MNT$215MNT$347MNT$805M
EBITDANT$96.4MNT$153MNT$148MNT$217MNT$711M
Net incomeNT$275MNT$353MNT$263MNT$341MNT$424M
Free cash flow-NT$102MNT$54.8MNT$625MNT$692MNT$1.16B
Capital expenditureNT$226MNT$8.44MNT$21.8MNT$44.3MNT$47.2M
Total debtNT$2.18BNT$320MNT$620MNT$813MNT$173M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

PCL Technologies competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%-40%-20%49716855101490688620613823406882596882160313303234785369206884582817406036288064696205909030031764434977.TW6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. PCL Technologies is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-50%0%+50%20×40×60×4971685510149068862061382340688259281740696264434977.TWRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. PCL Technologies is the large dot.

PCL Technologies competitors and peer comparison

How PCL Technologies compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

PCL Technologies against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure4977.TWPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-5.7%-25.9%3rd highest of 21
6-month return-22.5%-20.2%10th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-39.6%-49.5%6th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-25.7%+17.1%3rd lowest of 21
Operating margin2.3%2.1%10th highest of 21
Forward P/E60.0×12.7×2nd most expensive of 11
ROIC minus cost of capital-5.5 pp-3.7 pp10th lowest of 21
Net debt / EBITDA-25.5×-0.0×least indebted of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
PCL Technologies 4977.TWTaiwan$454M-23%-26%2%60.0×n/an/a
IntelliEPI Inc. (Cayman) 4971.TWOTaiwan$452M-60%+31%19%41.6×n/an/a
Japan Electronic Materials 6855.TJapan$451M-31%+38%26%9.7×10.9%+9.7%
S & S Tech 101490.KSSouth Korea$451M-71%+20%20%11.5×n/an/a
Guangzhou Anyka Microelectronics 688620.SSChina$449M-11%+70%1%66.7×n/an/a
Anpec Electronics 6138.TWOTaiwan$449M-20%+18%19%10.5×-1.6%+6.8%
Taiwan-Asia Semiconductor 2340.TWTaiwan$448M-19%0%-26%35.7×n/an/a
Triductor Technology (Suzhou) 688259.SSChina$446M-30%-32%-16%23.3×55.4%+11.6%
China Chippacking Technology 688216.SSChina$463M-14%+56%2%n/a20.2%+7.0%
SAMT 031330.KSSouth Korea$464M-9%+104%8%n/an/an/a
Truelight 3234.TWOTaiwan$443M+8%+10%-24%n/an/an/a
Cheng Mei Instrument Technology 7853.TWOTaiwan$442M-20%+2%-46%n/an/an/a
Phoenix Pioneer Technology 6920.TWOTaiwan$442M-44%+32%-10%n/an/an/a
Maxic Technology 688458.SSChina$468M-14%+7%-14%n/an/an/a
Lake Materials 281740.KSSouth Korea$468M-58%+6%11%13.9×n/an/a
Clenergy Technology 603628.SSChina$441M-13%-21%4%n/a13.0%+18.4%
Contrel Technology 8064.TWOTaiwan$469M-33%+28%15%n/a18.2%-5.5%
ITH 6962.TWTaiwan$436M-17%-3%2%5.3×1.4%-4.9%
MiCo 059090.KSSouth Korea$431M-18%+60%6%n/an/an/a
Jiawei Renewable Energy 300317.SZChina$484M-24%+16%-21%n/an/an/a
TSEC 6443.TWTaiwan$423M-31%-55%-122%9.1×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are PCL Technologies's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: IntelliEPI Inc. (Cayman) (4971.TWO), Japan Electronic Materials (6855.T), S & S Tech (101490.KS), Guangzhou Anyka Microelectronics (688620.SS), Anpec Electronics (6138.TWO), Taiwan-Asia Semiconductor (2340.TW), Triductor Technology (Suzhou) (688259.SS), China Chippacking Technology (688216.SS).
Is PCL Technologies expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 60.0× against a peer median of 12.7×, 2nd most expensive of 11 in its peer set.
How has PCL Technologies stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -22.5% against -20.2% for the median peer; over one year +46.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.