Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 101490.KS S & S Tech CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

S & S Tech Corporation101490.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Information Technology›Semiconductors
Momentum laggard 6
Mkt cap
$451M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
69%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$5.73M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
11.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+3.3 pp
WACC 9.2%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
11 days
17 Nov 2026
Close · KRW₩29,550
1D-7.5%
1W-21.2%
1M-44.7%
3M-29.5%
6M-70.7%
YTD-38.8%
1Y-50.3%
ATR %10.2%
52w lowhigh72.7% off high

What S & S Tech does

Employees: 311

S & S Tech at a glance

Size S & S Tech (101490.KS) is a South Korea Information Technology company (Semiconductors) with a market value of $451M, the 359th largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩29,550 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 70.7%, against -20.2% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 20.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.7%); the operating margin is 19.5% (peer median 2.1%).

Valuation It trades at 11.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 23.3× (5th cheapest of 12).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.3 points above its cost of capital (9.2% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 17 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

25507510011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 79101490.KS 30
Six months, rebased to 100: S & S Tech against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

S & S Tech financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₩253B₩244B₩176B₩150B₩124B
Revenue growth—+38%+17%+22%—
Gross profit₩79.9B₩82.5B₩58.0B₩41.4B₩32.7B
EBITDA₩65.2B₩64.2B₩42.9B₩31.4B₩26.1B
Net income₩62.9B₩58.3B₩30.5B₩25.9B₩17.5B
Free cash flow-₩28.8B-₩18.2B₩16.3B₩4.45B-₩7.03B
Capital expenditure₩78.2B₩64.5B₩19.9B₩21.3B₩32.3B
Total debt₩37.3B₩46.9B₩16.9B₩12.0B₩10.2B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

S & S Tech competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%-40%-20%68554971688620613823404977688259323478536920603628688216031330696268845828174080640590906443ALSEM101490.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. S & S Tech is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-50%0%+50%20×40×60×6855497168862061382340497768825969622817406443ALSEM101490.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. S & S Tech is the large dot.

S & S Tech competitors and peer comparison

How S & S Tech compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

S & S Tech against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure101490.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-44.7%-24.3%2nd lowest of 21
6-month return-70.7%-20.2%lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-72.7%-48.2%lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+20.4%+8.7%9th highest of 21
Operating margin19.5%2.1%2nd highest of 20
Forward P/E11.5×23.3×5th cheapest of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital+3.3 pp-3.9 pp5th highest of 20
EV / EBITDA8.7×12.2×4th cheapest of 10
Net debt / EBITDA-0.7×-0.0×6th least indebted of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
S & S Tech 101490.KSSouth Korea$451M-71%+20%20%11.5×n/an/a
Japan Electronic Materials 6855.TJapan$451M-31%+38%26%9.7×10.9%+9.7%
IntelliEPI Inc. (Cayman) 4971.TWOTaiwan$452M-60%+31%19%41.6×n/an/a
Guangzhou Anyka Microelectronics 688620.SSChina$449M-11%+70%1%66.7×n/an/a
Anpec Electronics 6138.TWOTaiwan$449M-20%+18%19%10.5×-1.6%+6.8%
Taiwan-Asia Semiconductor 2340.TWTaiwan$448M-19%0%-26%35.7×n/an/a
PCL Technologies 4977.TWTaiwan$454M-23%-26%2%60.0×n/an/a
Triductor Technology (Suzhou) 688259.SSChina$446M-30%-32%-16%23.3×55.4%+11.6%
Truelight 3234.TWOTaiwan$443M+8%+10%-24%n/an/an/a
Cheng Mei Instrument Technology 7853.TWOTaiwan$442M-20%+2%-46%n/an/an/a
Phoenix Pioneer Technology 6920.TWOTaiwan$442M-44%+32%-10%n/an/an/a
Clenergy Technology 603628.SSChina$441M-13%-21%4%n/a13.0%+18.4%
China Chippacking Technology 688216.SSChina$463M-14%+56%2%n/a20.2%+7.0%
SAMT 031330.KSSouth Korea$464M-9%+104%8%n/an/an/a
ITH 6962.TWTaiwan$436M-17%-3%2%5.3×1.4%-4.9%
Maxic Technology 688458.SSChina$468M-14%+7%-14%n/an/an/a
Lake Materials 281740.KSSouth Korea$468M-58%+6%11%13.9×n/an/a
Contrel Technology 8064.TWOTaiwan$469M-33%+28%15%n/a18.2%-5.5%
MiCo 059090.KSSouth Korea$431M-18%+60%6%n/an/an/a
TSEC 6443.TWTaiwan$423M-31%-55%-122%9.1×n/an/a
SEMCO Technologies ALSEM.PAFrance$421M-34%+7%n/a29.4×26.2%n/a

Questions

Which companies are S & S Tech's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Japan Electronic Materials (6855.T), IntelliEPI Inc. (Cayman) (4971.TWO), Guangzhou Anyka Microelectronics (688620.SS), Anpec Electronics (6138.TWO), Taiwan-Asia Semiconductor (2340.TW), PCL Technologies (4977.TW), Triductor Technology (Suzhou) (688259.SS), Truelight (3234.TWO).
Is S & S Tech expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 11.5× against a peer median of 23.3×, 5th cheapest of 12 in its peer set.
How has S & S Tech stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -70.7% against -20.2% for the median peer; over one year -50.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.