Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 2784.T Alfresa Holdings CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Alfresa Holdings Corporation2784.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Health Care›Medical Distributors

One of Japan's largest pharmaceutical wholesalers, distributing drugs and medical devices nationwide.

≈ Japan's Cardinal HealthMomentum strong 60
Mkt cap
$2.79B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
81%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$6.53M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
17.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+2.4 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-13 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
3 days
9 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥2,306
1D-8.3%
1W-5.5%
1M+2.7%
3M+1.4%
6M-2.5%
YTD-5.1%
1Y+6.2%
ATR %2.8%
52w lowhigh14.1% off high

What Alfresa does

One of Japan's largest pharmaceutical wholesalers, distributing drugs and medical devices nationwide.

Buys drugs from manufacturers and resells them to hospitals, clinics and pharmacies, keeping a thin mark-up per delivery, so volume and efficient logistics carry the business. Japan's government sets prescription drug prices and revises them regularly, which shapes what wholesalers can charge. It is one of four nationwide drug wholesalers.

In one line: Japan's Cardinal Health.

Products and services

  • Pharmaceutical wholesale distribution
  • Medical device distribution
  • Healthcare data services

Customers

  • Hospitals
  • Pharmacies
  • Clinics

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Health care
  • Pharmaceutical distribution
  • Wholesale distribution of drugs and…

What could go right

  • Drug volume growth from aging population

What could go wrong

  • Thin distribution margins
  • Drug price revisions by government

Moat: narrow (scale, distribution, regulatory licence). Nationwide licensed distribution network and scale purchasing in a low-margin, logistics-heavy business.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Founded: 1948 · Employees: 12,525

Named competitors

Alfresa at a glance

Size Alfresa (2784.T) is a Japan Health Care company (Medical Distributors) with a market value of $2.79B, the 382nd largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥2,306 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 2.5%, against +4.7% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 7th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 4.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.0%); the operating margin is 1.1% (peer median 3.2%).

Valuation It trades at 17.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.7× (8th most expensive of 16).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is -13 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.4 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 9 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 1042784.T 98
Six months, rebased to 100: Alfresa against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Alfresa financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥3.13T¥3.10T¥2.96T¥2.86T¥2.70T
Revenue growth—+5%+4%+6%—
Gross profit¥219B¥206B¥203B¥196B¥182B
EBITDA¥50.5B¥51.1B¥53.2B¥52.0B¥43.5B
Net income¥39.2B¥41.7B¥27.4B¥29.6B¥25.8B
Free cash flown/a¥16.1B-¥10.9B¥73.6B-¥9.63B
Capital expendituren/a¥29.1B¥21.1B¥15.7B¥25.5B
Total debt¥30.0B¥35.6B¥35.5B¥34.9B¥3.85B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Alfresa competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+20%+40%0%+10%+20%008930ASKER334999877459AMP600998RDC8129GALE3360DKSH30158460058710997476600713DOCMARJO-B6033682784.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Alfresa is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+5%+10%10×20×ASKER334999877459AMP6009988129GALE3360DKSH60058710997476ARJO-B6033682784.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Alfresa is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%0%20%008930ASKER99877459AMP600998GALE3360DKSH30158460058774766033682784.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Alfresa is the large dot.

Alfresa competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (2784.T vs 7459.T vs 9987.T vs 8129.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Alfresa 2784.T$2.79B-3%+5%1%17.4×-9.1%
MEDIPAL 7459.T$3.67B+14%+4%1%12.6×-7.4%
Suzuken 9987.T$2.29B-9%+5%1%15.0×-11.9%
Toho 8129.T$1.60B-14%+4%1%21.6×-7.4%

How Alfresa compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Alfresa against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure2784.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+2.7%+4.4%9th lowest of 21
6-month return-2.5%+4.7%7th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-14.1%-14.7%10th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+4.6%+6.0%9th lowest of 21
Operating margin1.1%3.2%4th lowest of 21
Forward P/E17.4×15.7×8th most expensive of 16
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-9.1%-1.4%4th least demanding of 17
Growth delivered (Del g)+3.5%+5.5%6th lowest of 17
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-12.6 pp-9.3 pp5th least demanding of 17
ROIC minus cost of capital+2.4 pp+1.6 pp9th highest of 21
Net debt / EBITDA-3.2×0.5×2nd least indebted of 13

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Alfresa 2784.TJapan$2.79B-3%+5%1%17.4×-9.1%+3.5%
Hanmi Science 008930.KSSouth Korea$2.71B+44%+6%5%n/a24.2%+9.6%
Asker Healthcare ASKER.STSweden$2.98B-5%+12%7%26.6×1.2%+12.7%
COSMOS Pharmaceutical 3349.TJapan$3.20B+5%+9%4%15.7×n/an/a
Suzuken 9987.TJapan$2.29B-9%+5%1%15.0×-11.9%+3.2%
MEDIPAL 7459.TJapan$3.67B+14%+4%1%12.6×-7.4%+3.5%
Amplifon AMP.MIItaly$3.72B+13%0%9%18.1×9.5%+9.8%
Jointown Pharmaceutical 600998.SSChina$3.96B+1%+9%2%11.7×0.1%+7.8%
Redcare Pharmacy RDC.DEGermany$1.63B+52%+19%0%n/an/an/a
Toho 8129.TJapan$1.60B-14%+4%1%21.6×-7.4%+5.1%
Galenica GALE.SWSwitzerland$5.46B+8%+6%5%23.4×6.9%+3.5%
Ship Healthcare 3360.TJapan$1.34B+4%+7%3%13.8×-14.7%+7.6%
DKSH DKSH.SWSwitzerland$6.10B+29%-1%3%21.5×-1.4%+0.6%
Shanghai C and D INNOSTIC Medical Technology 301584.SZChina$1.20B-28%+8%3%n/a-1.3%+17.9%
Shinva Medical Instrument 600587.SSChina$1.16B-7%+6%5%14.2×-5.9%+1.2%
Sinopharm 1099.HKHong Kong$6.83B-4%+3%3%6.3×-8.1%+4.0%
AS ONE 7476.TJapan$1.08B+15%+10%12%18.2×-1.0%+6.3%
Nanjing Pharmaceutical 600713.SSChina$1.03B+1%+3%2%n/an/an/a
DocMorris DOCM.SWSwitzerland$1.02B+136%+11%-8%n/an/an/a
Arjo ARJO-B.STSweden$1.02B+48%0%8%21.3×-1.3%+3.9%
Guangxi LiuYao 603368.SSChina$994M+2%+2%5%9.9×-9.5%+6.0%

Questions

Who are Alfresa's main competitors?
Named competitors: Medipal Holdings (7459.T), Suzuken (9987.T), Toho Holdings (8129.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Hanmi Science (008930.KS), Asker Healthcare (ASKER.ST), COSMOS Pharmaceutical (3349.T), Suzuken (9987.T), MEDIPAL (7459.T), Amplifon (AMP.MI).
Is Alfresa expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 17.4× against a peer median of 15.7×, 8th most expensive of 16 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is -13 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Alfresa stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -2.5% against +4.7% for the median peer; over one year +6.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.