Loading…

Sinopharm1099.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Health Care›Medical Distributors

China's largest pharmaceutical and medical-device distributor, state-owned, covering nationwide hospital and retail supply chains.

≈ China's McKesson/Cardinal Health for drug distributionMomentum leader 82
Mkt cap
$6.83B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$15.0M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
6.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+0.2 pp
WACC 5.2%
Hurdle
-12 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
133 days
19 Mar 2027
Close · HKDHK$17.16
1D+1.1%
1W+6.0%
1M+15.6%
3M+1.2%
6M-3.7%
YTD-7.2%
1Y-6.8%
ATR %2.6%
52w lowhigh19.3% off high

What Sinopharm does

China's largest pharmaceutical and medical-device distributor, state-owned, covering nationwide hospital and retail supply chains.

Buys medicines and devices from manufacturers and resells them to hospitals and pharmacies, earning a small margin on each sale, so volume and payment terms matter more than price. A state-owned parent, China National Pharmaceutical Group, controls it.

In one line: China's McKesson/Cardinal Health for drug distribution.

Products and services

  • Pharmaceutical distribution
  • Medical device distribution
  • Retail pharmacy chains
  • Healthcare logistics

Customers

  • Hospitals
  • Retail pharmacies

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Healthcare
  • Pharma distribution
  • Wholesale drug & medical-device…

What could go right

  • Hospital drug volume growth
  • Retail pharmacy network expansion

What could go wrong

  • Thin distribution margins
  • Drug-price reform (volume-based procurement)

Moat: narrow (scale, distribution, regulatory licence). Nationwide logistics network and state backing give scale advantages in a low-margin business.

Headquarters: Beijing, China · Founded: 2003 · Employees: 94,910

Named competitors

Sinopharm at a glance

Size Sinopharm (1099.HK) is a Hong Kong Health Care company (Medical Distributors) with a market value of $6.83B, the 217th largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$17.16 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 3.7%, against +7.8% for the median peer and -13.4% for the Hong Kong market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 12 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 2.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.2%); the operating margin is 2.9% (peer median 3.8%).

Valuation It trades at 6.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.6× (cheapest of 11).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is -12 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.2 points above its cost of capital (5.2% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 19 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 1091099.HK 98
Six months, rebased to 100: Sinopharm against the median of its 11 peers (local-currency closes).

Sinopharm financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$639BHK$624BHK$634BHK$659BHK$642B
Revenue growth—-2%-4%+3%—
Gross profitHK$43.1BHK$43.3BHK$46.0BHK$51.6BHK$53.1B
EBITDAHK$22.8BHK$22.7BHK$23.9BHK$28.9BHK$30.3B
Net incomeHK$7.92BHK$7.76BHK$7.64BHK$10.0BHK$9.91B
Free cash flowHK$20.1BHK$11.6B-HK$5.87BHK$12.9BHK$17.0B
Capital expenditureHK$1.77BHK$1.75BHK$2.13BHK$2.58BHK$2.81B
Total debtn/aHK$112BHK$122BHK$123BHK$120B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Sinopharm competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+20%+40%0%+10%DKSHGALEHSIC600998AMP74593349ASKER278400893099871099.HK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Sinopharm is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+5%+10%10×20×DKSHGALEHSIC600998AMP74593349ASKER278499871099.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Sinopharm is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%0%20%DKSHGALEHSIC600998AMP7459ASKER278400893099871099.HKGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Sinopharm is the large dot.

Sinopharm competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (1099.HK vs 3320.HK vs 2607.HK vs 600998.SS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Sinopharm 1099.HK$6.83B-4%+3%3%6.3×-8.1%
China Resources Pharmaceutical 3320.HK$3.74B-11%+8%4%6.0×-5.3%
Shanghai Pharmaceuticals 2607.HK$8.48B-7%+9%3%6.6×-10.3%
Jointown Pharmaceutical 600998.SS$3.96B+1%+9%2%11.7×0.1%
Nanjing Pharmaceutical 600713.SS$1.03B+1%+3%2%n/an/a
DaShenLin Pharmaceutical 603233.SS$3.80B+15%+7%8%16.6×-9.0%
Yifeng Pharmacy Chain 603939.SS$4.91B+17%+5%10%17.2×-9.2%

How Sinopharm compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Sinopharm against its 11 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure1099.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+15.6%+3.6%highest of 12
6-month return-3.7%+7.8%3rd lowest of 12
Distance from 52-week high-19.3%-14.1%4th lowest of 12
Revenue growth (TTM)+2.8%+6.2%3rd lowest of 12
Operating margin2.9%3.8%5th lowest of 12
Forward P/E6.3×16.6×cheapest of 11
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-8.1%0.6%3rd least demanding of 11
Growth delivered (Del g)+4.0%+4.5%6th highest of 11
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-12.1 pp-4.9 pp3rd least demanding of 11
ROIC minus cost of capital+0.2 pp+1.6 pp5th lowest of 12
Net debt / EBITDA3.3×0.5×most indebted of 9

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Sinopharm 1099.HKHong Kong$6.83B-4%+3%3%6.3×-8.1%+4.0%
DKSH DKSH.SWSwitzerland$6.10B+29%-1%3%21.5×-1.4%+0.6%
Galenica GALE.SWSwitzerland$5.46B+8%+6%5%23.4×6.9%+3.5%
Henry Schein HSICUnited States$9.51B+22%+6%6%14.8×9.8%+5.4%
Jointown Pharmaceutical 600998.SSChina$3.96B+1%+9%2%11.7×0.1%+7.8%
Amplifon AMP.MIItaly$3.72B+13%0%9%18.1×9.5%+9.8%
MEDIPAL 7459.TJapan$3.67B+14%+4%1%12.6×-7.4%+3.5%
COSMOS Pharmaceutical 3349.TJapan$3.20B+5%+9%4%15.7×n/an/a
Asker Healthcare ASKER.STSweden$2.98B-5%+12%7%26.6×1.2%+12.7%
Alfresa 2784.TJapan$2.79B-3%+5%1%17.4×-9.1%+3.5%
Hanmi Science 008930.KSSouth Korea$2.71B+44%+6%5%n/a24.2%+9.6%
Suzuken 9987.TJapan$2.29B-9%+5%1%15.0×-11.9%+3.2%

Questions

Who are Sinopharm's main competitors?
Named competitors: China Resources Pharmaceutical (3320.HK), Shanghai Pharmaceuticals (2607.HK), China National Pharmaceutical Group affiliates (private or unlisted), Jointown Pharmaceutical (600998.SS), Nanjing Pharmaceutical (600713.SS), Dashenlin Pharmaceutical (603233.SS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes DKSH (DKSH.SW), Galenica (GALE.SW), Henry Schein (HSIC), Jointown Pharmaceutical (600998.SS), Amplifon (AMP.MI), MEDIPAL (7459.T).
Is Sinopharm expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 6.3× against a peer median of 16.6×, cheapest of 11 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +4%, so the hurdle is -12 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Sinopharm stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -3.7% against +7.8% for the median peer; over one year -6.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.