Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 600713.SS Nanjing Pharmaceutical Group Company Limited Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Nanjing Pharmaceutical Group Company Limited Class A600713.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Health Care›Medical Distributors
Momentum leader 88
Mkt cap
$1.03B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
40%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$9.84M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
+0.8 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · CNYCN¥5.32
1D+0.4%
1W+4.3%
1M+6.2%
3M+3.9%
6M+0.8%
YTD-2.6%
1Y+3.9%
ATR %2.5%
52w lowhigh20.0% off high

What Nanjing Pharmaceutical does

Employees: 4,697

Nanjing Pharmaceutical at a glance

Size Nanjing Pharmaceutical (600713.SS) is a China Health Care company (Medical Distributors) with a market value of $1.03B, the 2252nd largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥5.32 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 0.8%, against -6.8% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 9th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 3.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.1%); the operating margin is 2.5% (peer median 1.3%).

Valuation It trades at 0.3× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 0.6× (7th cheapest of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.8 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Relative performance

909510011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026600713.SS 100Peer median 94
Six months, rebased to 100: Nanjing Pharmaceutical against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Nanjing Pharmaceutical financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥55.5BCN¥54.9BCN¥53.6BCN¥53.5BCN¥50.2B
Revenue growth—+2%0%+7%—
Gross profitCN¥3.51BCN¥3.06BCN¥3.04BCN¥2.98BCN¥2.93B
EBITDAn/aCN¥1.60BCN¥1.78BCN¥1.77BCN¥1.64B
Net incomeCN¥638MCN¥625MCN¥571MCN¥578MCN¥596M
Free cash flow-CN¥1.70B-CN¥153MCN¥1.59BCN¥1.75B-CN¥835M
Capital expenditureCN¥215MCN¥251MCN¥545MCN¥158MCN¥155M
Total debtCN¥12.1BCN¥9.04BCN¥12.6BCN¥11.6BCN¥15.2B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Nanjing Pharmaceutical competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%0%+10%+20%DOCMARJO-B6033687476688366600587301584ENTERONEU33608129RDC6006283013706051366037160000783151600713.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Nanjing Pharmaceutical is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%-10%0%+10%+20%0×1×2×DOCMARJO-B6033687476688366600587301584ENTERONEU33608129RDC6006283013702733605136603716000078600713.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Nanjing Pharmaceutical is the large dot.

Nanjing Pharmaceutical competitors and peer comparison

How Nanjing Pharmaceutical compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Nanjing Pharmaceutical against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure600713.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+6.2%+0.8%5th highest of 21
6-month return+0.8%-6.8%9th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-20.0%-19.8%11th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+3.0%+4.1%10th lowest of 21
Operating margin2.5%1.3%9th highest of 21
EV / Sales0.3×0.6×7th cheapest of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital+0.8 pp+0.4 pp10th highest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Nanjing Pharmaceutical 600713.SSChina$1.03B+1%+3%2%0.3×n/an/a
DocMorris DOCM.SWSwitzerland$1.02B+136%+11%-8%0.9×n/an/a
Arjo ARJO-B.STSweden$1.02B+48%0%8%1.3×-1.3%+3.9%
Guangxi LiuYao 603368.SSChina$994M+2%+2%5%0.4×-9.5%+6.0%
AS ONE 7476.TJapan$1.08B+15%+10%12%1.3×-1.0%+6.3%
Shanghai Haohai Biological Technology 688366.SSChina$946M-24%-9%-2%2.0×18.9%+13.2%
Shinva Medical Instrument 600587.SSChina$1.16B-7%+6%5%0.7×-5.9%+1.2%
Shanghai C and D INNOSTIC Medical Technology 301584.SZChina$1.20B-28%+8%3%0.6×-1.3%+17.9%
Entero Healthcare Solutions ENTERO.NSIndia$875M+50%+32%4%1.2×21.8%+29.9%
Neuca NEU.WAPoland$817M-1%+8%2%0.3×5.0%+8.1%
Ship Healthcare 3360.TJapan$1.34B+4%+7%3%0.2×-14.7%+7.6%
Toho 8129.TJapan$1.60B-14%+4%1%0.1×-7.4%+5.1%
Redcare Pharmacy RDC.DEGermany$1.63B+52%+19%0%0.5×n/an/a
Shanghai New World 600628.SSChina$623M-11%-2%6%2.4×0.3%+1.0%
GKHT Medical Technology 301370.SZChina$569M-22%-11%1%0.8×14.4%+7.5%
Arata 2733.TJapan$552M-7%+3%1%0.1×-7.1%+3.8%
Shanghai Lily & Beauty Cosmetics 605136.SSChina$517M-21%+10%0%1.2×12.2%-18.1%
Thalys Medical Technology 603716.SSChina$501M-29%-41%-17%4.1×n/an/a
Shenzhen Neptunus Bioengineering 000078.SZChina$475M-60%-22%-1%0.6×59.0%-7.8%
Suzuken 9987.TJapan$2.29B-9%+5%1%0.1×-11.9%+3.2%
Vital KSK 3151.TJapan$428M+7%+2%1%0.1×0.4%+2.6%

Questions

Which companies are Nanjing Pharmaceutical's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: DocMorris (DOCM.SW), Arjo (ARJO-B.ST), Guangxi LiuYao (603368.SS), AS ONE (7476.T), Shanghai Haohai Biological Technology (688366.SS), Shinva Medical Instrument (600587.SS), Shanghai C and D INNOSTIC Medical Technology (301584.SZ), Entero Healthcare Solutions (ENTERO.NS).
Is Nanjing Pharmaceutical expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 0.3× against a peer median of 0.6×, 7th cheapest of 21 in its peer set.
How has Nanjing Pharmaceutical stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +0.8% against -6.8% for the median peer; over one year +3.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.