Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 3360.T Ship Healthcare Holdings, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

Ship Healthcare Holdings, Inc.3360.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Health Care›Medical Distributors

Japanese distributor of medical equipment that also plans and builds hospital facilities.

≈ A medical-equipment distributor plus hospital-facility planner, unlike a single US peerMomentum neutral 57
Mkt cap
$1.34B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
76%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$4.48M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
13.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+13.1 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-22 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
4 days
10 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥2,426
1D-4.0%
1W-3.6%
1M-1.7%
3M-3.3%
6M+4.5%
YTD-7.6%
1Y+3.2%
ATR %2.7%
52w lowhigh14.6% off high

What Ship Healthcare does

Japanese distributor of medical equipment that also plans and builds hospital facilities.

Earns distribution margins as hospitals order equipment and supplies from it, and hospital construction projects bring larger one-off contracts. Dispensing pharmacies and elder-care services add a steadier line. Many of its hospital relationships are long-standing.

In one line: A medical-equipment distributor plus hospital-facility planner, unlike a single US peer.

Products and services

  • Medical equipment distribution
  • Hospital facility planning/construction

Customers

  • Hospitals
  • Clinics

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Health care
  • Medical equipment distribution
  • Equipment sales, hospital facility…

What could go right

  • Hospital construction/renovation demand

What could go wrong

  • Hospital capex cyclicality
  • Government healthcare budget constraints

Moat: narrow (customer qualification, distribution). Combining equipment sales with facility design/construction locks in long hospital relationships.

Headquarters: Hiroshima, Japan · Founded: 1948 · Employees: 7,819

Named competitors

Ship Healthcare at a glance

Size Ship Healthcare (3360.T) is a Japan Health Care company (Medical Distributors) with a market value of $1.34B, the 615th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥2,426 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 4.5%, against -1.7% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 8th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 6.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.2%); the operating margin is 3.3% (peer median 2.8%).

Valuation It trades at 13.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 17.4× (3rd cheapest of 14).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -15% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is -22 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 13.1 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 10 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20263360.T 105Peer median 98
Six months, rebased to 100: Ship Healthcare against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Ship Healthcare financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥731B¥718B¥678B¥631B¥572B
Revenue growth—+6%+7%+10%—
Gross profit¥66.6B¥66.7B¥66.7B¥65.6B¥60.6B
EBITDA¥31.6B¥31.6B¥32.2B¥31.9B¥28.6B
Net income¥13.5B¥13.4B¥15.1B¥13.8B¥12.1B
Free cash flown/a¥17.8B¥16.6B¥28.4B¥10.6B
Capital expendituren/a¥4.71B¥4.18B¥3.52B¥3.91B
Total debt¥26.5B¥31.9B¥39.3B¥59.9B¥76.0B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Ship Healthcare competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%0%+10%+20%3015846005878129RDC7476600713DOCMARJO-B603368688366ENTERONEU99870089302784ASKER30137033493360.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Ship Healthcare is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%+20%+30%20×40×60058781297476ARJO-B603368688366ENTERONEU2784ASKER334927333360.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Ship Healthcare is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%0%20%30158460058781297476603368688366ENTERONEU99870089302784600628ASKER3013703360.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Ship Healthcare is the large dot.

Ship Healthcare competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (3360.T vs 7476.T vs 8086.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Ship Healthcare 3360.T$1.34B+4%+7%3%13.8×-14.7%
AS ONE 7476.T$1.08B+15%+10%12%18.2×-1.0%
NIPRO 8086.T$1.55B-9%+3%6%14.9×n/a

How Ship Healthcare compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Ship Healthcare against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure3360.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-1.7%+2.7%4th lowest of 21
6-month return+4.5%-1.7%8th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-14.6%-19.4%8th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+6.5%+5.2%9th highest of 21
Operating margin3.3%2.8%10th highest of 21
Forward P/E13.8×17.4×3rd cheapest of 14
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-14.7%-1.1%least demanding of 17
Growth delivered (Del g)+7.6%+6.1%7th highest of 17
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-22.4 pp-7.7 ppleast demanding of 17
ROIC minus cost of capital+13.1 pp+1.6 pphighest of 21
Net debt / EBITDA-1.8×0.8×4th least indebted of 11

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Ship Healthcare 3360.TJapan$1.34B+4%+7%3%13.8×-14.7%+7.6%
Shanghai C and D INNOSTIC Medical Technology 301584.SZChina$1.20B-28%+8%3%n/a-1.3%+17.9%
Shinva Medical Instrument 600587.SSChina$1.16B-7%+6%5%14.2×-5.9%+1.2%
Toho 8129.TJapan$1.60B-14%+4%1%21.6×-7.4%+5.1%
Redcare Pharmacy RDC.DEGermany$1.63B+52%+19%0%n/an/an/a
AS ONE 7476.TJapan$1.08B+15%+10%12%18.2×-1.0%+6.3%
Nanjing Pharmaceutical 600713.SSChina$1.03B+1%+3%2%n/an/an/a
DocMorris DOCM.SWSwitzerland$1.02B+136%+11%-8%n/an/an/a
Arjo ARJO-B.STSweden$1.02B+48%0%8%21.3×-1.3%+3.9%
Guangxi LiuYao 603368.SSChina$994M+2%+2%5%9.9×-9.5%+6.0%
Shanghai Haohai Biological Technology 688366.SSChina$946M-24%-9%-2%17.4×18.9%+13.2%
Entero Healthcare Solutions ENTERO.NSIndia$875M+50%+32%4%46.5×21.8%+29.9%
Neuca NEU.WAPoland$817M-1%+8%2%15.3×5.0%+8.1%
Suzuken 9987.TJapan$2.29B-9%+5%1%15.0×-11.9%+3.2%
Hanmi Science 008930.KSSouth Korea$2.71B+44%+6%5%n/a24.2%+9.6%
Alfresa 2784.TJapan$2.79B-3%+5%1%17.4×-9.1%+3.5%
Shanghai New World 600628.SSChina$623M-11%-2%6%n/a0.3%+1.0%
Asker Healthcare ASKER.STSweden$2.98B-5%+12%7%26.6×1.2%+12.7%
GKHT Medical Technology 301370.SZChina$569M-22%-11%1%n/a14.4%+7.5%
COSMOS Pharmaceutical 3349.TJapan$3.20B+5%+9%4%15.7×n/an/a
Arata 2733.TJapan$552M-7%+3%1%11.9×-7.1%+3.8%

Questions

Who are Ship Healthcare's main competitors?
Named competitors: AS ONE Corporation (7476.T), Nipro (8086.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Shanghai C and D INNOSTIC Medical Technology (301584.SZ), Shinva Medical Instrument (600587.SS), Toho (8129.T), Redcare Pharmacy (RDC.DE), AS ONE (7476.T), Nanjing Pharmaceutical (600713.SS).
Is Ship Healthcare expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 13.8× against a peer median of 17.4×, 3rd cheapest of 14 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -15% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is -22 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Ship Healthcare stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +4.5% against -1.7% for the median peer; over one year +3.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.