Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 2124.T JAC Recruitment Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

JAC Recruitment Co., Ltd.2124.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Industrials›Personnel Services

Japanese recruitment agency specializing in placing bilingual and professional/executive candidates.

≈ A Japanese executive-search firm like a smaller Korn FerryMomentum leader 94
Mkt cap
$1.21B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
45%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$3.01M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
19.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
n/a
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-17 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
7 days
13 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥1,156
1D-4.9%
1W+6.5%
1M+10.9%
3M+24.3%
6M+34.1%
YTD+8.5%
1Y+11.7%
ATR %3.0%
52w lowhigh5.6% off high

What JAC Recruitment does

Japanese recruitment agency specializing in placing bilingual and professional/executive candidates.

In one line: A Japanese executive-search firm like a smaller Korn Ferry.

Products and services

  • Professional/executive recruitment
  • Bilingual talent placement

Customers

  • Multinational and Japanese companies hiring profes

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Recruitment services
  • Professional/executive recruitment…

What could go right

  • Multinational hiring demand in Japan

What could go wrong

  • Placement volume tied to hiring market cyclicality

Moat: none (brand). Niche brand in bilingual/professional recruitment but competes with many placement agencies.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Founded: 1975 · Employees: 2,398

Named competitors

JAC Recruitment at a glance

Size JAC Recruitment (2124.T) is a Japan Industrials company (Personnel Services) with a market value of $1.21B, the 657th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥1,156 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 34.1%, against +22.5% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 8th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 12.3% over the last twelve months (peer median -0.3%); the operating margin is 25.8% (peer median 3.5%).

Valuation It trades at 19.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.0× (6th most expensive of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +16%, so the hurdle is -17 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Next results Next results expected around 13 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012014011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20262124.T 136Peer median 123
Six months, rebased to 100: JAC Recruitment against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

JAC Recruitment financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥48.7B¥46.1B¥39.2B¥34.5B¥30.4B
Revenue growth—+18%+14%+13%—
Gross profit¥44.7B¥42.3B¥35.6B¥31.2B¥27.5B
EBITDA¥13.1B¥12.2B¥9.75B¥8.88B¥7.62B
Net income¥9.02B¥8.40B¥5.61B¥5.98B¥5.03B
Free cash flown/a¥9.39B¥7.93B¥6.93B¥5.60B
Capital expendituren/a¥422M¥458M¥476M¥748M
Total debt¥242M¥341M¥307M¥353M¥449M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

JAC Recruitment competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%-10%0%+10%HASUPWK21542175KFRCGPPPAGE2146SDGBBSIMAN300662CEN2379CHZKELYAQUESS48492225STEM2124.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. JAC Recruitment is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%20×40×60×HASUPWK21542175KFRCGPPPAGE2146SDGBBSIMAN300662CEN2379CHZKELYA4849STEM2124.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. JAC Recruitment is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%+30%0%20%HASUPWK21542175KFRCGPPPAGE2146SDGBBSIMAN3006622379CHZKELYAQUESSSTEM2124.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. JAC Recruitment is the large dot.

JAC Recruitment competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (2124.T vs 6098.T vs 2181.T vs 4849.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
JAC Recruitment 2124.T$1.21B+34%+12%26%19.3×-1.0%
Recruit 6098.T$149B+133%+9%20%30.3×22.0%
Persol 2181.T$4.11B+22%+10%4%13.7×-10.3%
en Inc. 4849.T$504M+60%-11%7%9.6×5.3%

How JAC Recruitment compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

JAC Recruitment against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure2124.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+10.9%-2.8%2nd highest of 21
6-month return+34.1%+22.5%8th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-5.6%-17.0%highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+12.3%-0.3%3rd highest of 21
Operating margin25.8%3.5%2nd highest of 21
Forward P/E19.3×14.0×6th most expensive of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-1.0%6.0%7th least demanding of 19
Growth delivered (Del g)+16.4%+7.1%3rd highest of 19
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-17.4 pp-1.2 pp7th least demanding of 19
EV / EBITDA13.0×8.8×2nd most expensive of 10
Net debt / EBITDA-1.6×-0.7×7th least indebted of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
JAC Recruitment 2124.TJapan$1.21B+34%+12%26%19.3×-1.0%+16.4%
Hays HAS.LUnited Kingdom$1.24B+75%-3%1%33.0×18.3%+2.6%
Upwork UPWKUnited States$1.26B+14%-1%18%8.9×-7.1%+16.1%
Open Up 2154.TJapan$1.11B+12%-11%10%13.1×-6.5%+11.1%
SMS 2175.TJapan$1.31B+33%+8%11%31.1×19.2%+12.5%
Kforce KFRCUnited States$970M+25%+2%5%18.0×9.8%-1.0%
Grupa Pracuj spolka akcyjna GPP.WAPoland$919M+23%+5%37%13.1×-1.9%+22.1%
Michael Page PAGE.LUnited Kingdom$896M+60%-3%2%43.4×23.5%+4.1%
UT Group Co.,Ltd. 2146.TJapan$868M+22%-13%7%16.1×6.7%+7.7%
Synergie SDG.PAFrance$753M-3%+5%3%11.8×-13.4%+8.2%
Barrett Business Services BBSIUnited States$725M0%+6%4%18.2×1.9%+7.1%
ManpowerGroup MANUnited States$2.07B+49%+7%2%10.3×-0.4%0.0%
Beijing Career International 300662.SZChina$643M-10%+13%2%12.0×10.6%+29.9%
Groupe Crit CEN.PAFrance$534M-20%+1%3%8.3×n/an/a
dip 2379.TJapan$520M-17%-9%7%68.1×-1.1%+11.0%
HRnetGroup CHZ.SISingapore$519M-9%+1%7%14.0×-13.1%+6.2%
Kelly Services KELYAUnited States$507M+40%-10%1%10.2×12.8%-1.2%
Quess QUESS.NSIndia$505M+41%-12%2%17.1×16.3%+7.1%
en Inc. 4849.TJapan$504M+60%-11%7%9.6×5.3%+6.7%
Jinhai Medical Technology 2225.HKHong Kong$3.02B-6%+75%-17%n/an/an/a
SThree STEM.LUnited Kingdom$481M+65%-9%2%42.2×10.2%+1.6%

Questions

Who are JAC Recruitment's main competitors?
Named competitors: Recruit Holdings (6098.T), Persol Holdings (2181.T), en Japan (4849.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Hays (HAS.L), Upwork (UPWK), Open Up (2154.T), SMS (2175.T), Kforce (KFRC), Grupa Pracuj spolka akcyjna (GPP.WA).
Is JAC Recruitment expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 19.3× against a peer median of 14.0×, 6th most expensive of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +16%, so the hurdle is -17 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has JAC Recruitment stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +34.1% against +22.5% for the median peer; over one year +11.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.