Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 2154.T Open Up Group Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

Open Up Group Inc.2154.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Industrials›Personnel Services

Japanese staffing company dispatching IT engineers and other technical professionals to client companies.

≈ A Japanese technical-staffing firm like a smaller Robert HalfMomentum strong 69
Mkt cap
$1.11B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
64%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$2.08M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
13.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+9.5 pp
WACC 5.6%
Hurdle
-18 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
91 days
5 Feb 2027
Close · JPY¥1,961
1D-5.2%
1W-1.8%
1M-0.5%
3M-0.8%
6M+11.8%
YTD+6.4%
1Y+13.8%
ATR %2.3%
52w lowhigh6.9% off high

What Open Up does

Japanese staffing company dispatching IT engineers and other technical professionals to client companies.

In one line: A Japanese technical-staffing firm like a smaller Robert Half.

Products and services

  • IT engineer dispatch/staffing
  • Career/training support for engineers

Customers

  • Companies needing IT/technical staff

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Staffing services
  • IT engineer dispatch/staffing

What could go right

  • IT engineer shortage driving dispatch demand

What could go wrong

  • Staffing volume tied to IT hiring cyclicality

Moat: none (scale). Competes in a crowded, largely undifferentiated IT-staffing market on price and engineer supply.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Founded: 2005 · Employees: 26,862

Named competitors

Open Up at a glance

Size Open Up (2154.T) is a Japan Industrials company (Personnel Services) with a market value of $1.11B, the 691st largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥1,961 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 11.8%, against +23.9% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 10.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +0.8%); the operating margin is 9.8% (peer median 3.5%).

Valuation It trades at 13.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.1× (9th cheapest of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +11%, so the hurdle is -18 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 9.5 points above its cost of capital (5.6% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 5 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 1262154.T 112
Six months, rebased to 100: Open Up against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Open Up financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-06-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
Revenue¥167B¥167B¥188B¥173B¥151B
Revenue growth—-11%+9%+15%—
Gross profit¥46.2B¥44.0B¥45.1B¥40.0B¥34.8B
EBITDA¥18.7B¥18.7B¥18.0B¥16.4B¥13.7B
Net income¥11.8B¥11.8B¥12.6B¥11.8B¥9.53B
Free cash flow¥17.6B¥17.6B¥13.4B¥18.6B¥15.2B
Capital expenditure¥596M¥596M¥1.04B¥730M¥727M
Total debt¥18.2B¥18.2B¥12.7B¥7.99B¥7.05B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Open Up competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%-10%0%+10%2124HASUPWKKFRC2175GPPPAGE2146SDGBBSI300662MANCEN2379CHZKELYAQUESS4849STEM22252154.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Open Up is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%20×40×60×2124HASUPWKKFRC2175GPPPAGE2146SDGBBSI300662MANCEN2379CHZKELYA4849STEM2154.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Open Up is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%+30%0%20%2124HASUPWKKFRC2175GPPPAGE2146SDGBBSI300662MAN2379CHZKELYAQUESSSTEM2154.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Open Up is the large dot.

Open Up competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (2154.T vs 9744.T vs 2181.T vs 2146.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Open Up 2154.T$1.11B+12%-11%10%13.1×-6.5%
MEITEC 9744.T$1.57B+3%+2%14%18.7×-4.6%
Persol 2181.T$4.11B+22%+10%4%13.7×-10.3%
UT Group Co.,Ltd. 2146.T$868M+22%-13%7%16.1×6.7%

How Open Up compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Open Up against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure2154.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-0.5%-2.8%8th highest of 21
6-month return+11.8%+23.9%8th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-6.9%-17.0%2nd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-10.9%+0.8%3rd lowest of 21
Operating margin9.8%3.5%5th highest of 21
Forward P/E13.1×16.1×9th cheapest of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-6.5%6.0%4th least demanding of 19
Growth delivered (Del g)+11.1%+7.1%6th highest of 19
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-17.7 pp-1.2 pp6th least demanding of 19
ROIC minus cost of capital+9.5 pp+5.6 pp9th highest of 20
EV / EBITDA9.1×8.8×5th most expensive of 10
Net debt / EBITDA-0.3×-0.9×7th most indebted of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Open Up 2154.TJapan$1.11B+12%-11%10%13.1×-6.5%+11.1%
JAC Recruitment 2124.TJapan$1.21B+34%+12%26%19.3×-1.0%+16.4%
Hays HAS.LUnited Kingdom$1.24B+75%-3%1%33.0×18.3%+2.6%
Upwork UPWKUnited States$1.26B+14%-1%18%8.9×-7.1%+16.1%
Kforce KFRCUnited States$970M+25%+2%5%18.0×9.8%-1.0%
SMS 2175.TJapan$1.31B+33%+8%11%31.1×19.2%+12.5%
Grupa Pracuj spolka akcyjna GPP.WAPoland$919M+23%+5%37%13.1×-1.9%+22.1%
Michael Page PAGE.LUnited Kingdom$896M+60%-3%2%43.4×23.5%+4.1%
UT Group Co.,Ltd. 2146.TJapan$868M+22%-13%7%16.1×6.7%+7.7%
Synergie SDG.PAFrance$753M-3%+5%3%11.8×-13.4%+8.2%
Barrett Business Services BBSIUnited States$725M0%+6%4%18.2×1.9%+7.1%
Beijing Career International 300662.SZChina$643M-10%+13%2%12.0×10.6%+29.9%
ManpowerGroup MANUnited States$2.07B+49%+7%2%10.3×-0.4%0.0%
Groupe Crit CEN.PAFrance$534M-20%+1%3%8.3×n/an/a
dip 2379.TJapan$520M-17%-9%7%68.1×-1.1%+11.0%
HRnetGroup CHZ.SISingapore$519M-9%+1%7%14.0×-13.1%+6.2%
Kelly Services KELYAUnited States$507M+40%-10%1%10.2×12.8%-1.2%
Quess QUESS.NSIndia$505M+41%-12%2%17.1×16.3%+7.1%
en Inc. 4849.TJapan$504M+60%-11%7%9.6×5.3%+6.7%
SThree STEM.LUnited Kingdom$481M+65%-9%2%42.2×10.2%+1.6%
Jinhai Medical Technology 2225.HKHong Kong$3.02B-6%+75%-17%n/an/an/a

Questions

Who are Open Up's main competitors?
Named competitors: MEITEC Group (9744.T), Persol Holdings (2181.T), UT Group (2146.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes JAC Recruitment (2124.T), Hays (HAS.L), Upwork (UPWK), Kforce (KFRC), SMS (2175.T), Grupa Pracuj spolka akcyjna (GPP.WA).
Is Open Up expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 13.1× against a peer median of 16.1×, 9th cheapest of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +11%, so the hurdle is -18 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Open Up stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +11.8% against +23.9% for the median peer; over one year +13.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.