Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 1860.T Toda CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Toda Corporation1860.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Industrials›Engineering & Construction

Major Japanese general contractor (zenekon) building commercial, residential and civil-engineering projects.

≈ A mid-tier Japanese equivalent of a US general contractor like Turner ConstructionMomentum neutral 46
Mkt cap
$2.58B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
60%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$8.41M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
11.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-0.7 pp
WACC 5.1%
Hurdle
-6 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
7 days
13 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥1,375
1D-6.3%
1W-6.2%
1M+0.9%
3M-7.4%
6M-3.0%
YTD+8.6%
1Y+31.3%
ATR %2.5%
52w lowhigh17.4% off high

What Toda does

Major Japanese general contractor (zenekon) building commercial, residential and civil-engineering projects.

Wins projects by competitive bid or negotiated contract and books revenue as work progresses, so profit depends on managing material and labor costs on fixed-price contracts. A smaller real-estate business supplements the construction work.

In one line: A mid-tier Japanese equivalent of a US general contractor like Turner Construction.

Products and services

  • Building construction
  • Civil engineering/infrastructure
  • Renovation/real estate development

Customers

  • Corporate/institutional building owners
  • Government infrastructure agencies
  • Real estate developers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Construction
  • General contracting
  • Buildings, civil engineering

What could go right

  • Urban redevelopment/data center construction demand

What could go wrong

  • Construction labor shortage/cost inflation
  • Public works budget cycles

Moat: narrow (scale, brand). Scale and track record among Japan's leading general contractors in a fragmented, competitive industry.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Founded: 1881 · Employees: 7,286

Named competitors

Toda at a glance

Size Toda (1860.T) is a Japan Industrials company (Engineering & Construction) with a market value of $2.58B, the 404th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥1,375 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 3.0%, against -6.9% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 8th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 10.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.5%); the operating margin is 6.2% (peer median 5.1%).

Valuation It trades at 11.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.5× (5th cheapest of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +5%, so the hurdle is -6 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.7 points below its cost of capital (5.1% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 13 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20261860.T 97Peer median 94
Six months, rebased to 100: Toda against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Toda financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥670B¥646B¥587B¥522B¥547B
Revenue growth—+10%+12%-5%—
Gross profit¥95.5B¥92.2B¥76.8B¥65.6B¥57.3B
EBITDA¥52.9B¥49.4B¥35.6B¥25.4B¥20.8B
Net income¥45.2B¥37.0B¥25.2B¥16.1B¥11.0B
Free cash flown/a¥34.3B-¥36.4B¥6.95B-¥67.1B
Capital expendituren/a¥29.2B¥64.0B¥56.5B¥37.6B
Total debt¥212B¥231B¥256B¥227B¥212B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Toda competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%-10%0%+10%CEMPROTREGBFARE600820HEIJMKLRKPILBDT600629AFGENOMGNSWBDPEAB-B195160017019631893ACMESOLAR1860.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Toda is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%10×20×30×CEMPROTREGBFARE600820HEIJMKLRKPILBDT600629ENOMGNSWBDPEAB-B19516001701963ACMESOLAR1860.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Toda is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%CEMPROTREGBFARE600820KLRKPILBDTAFGENOWBDPEAB-B6001701860.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Toda is the large dot.

Toda competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (1860.T vs 1802.T vs 1801.T vs 1803.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Toda 1860.T$2.58B-3%+10%6%11.1×-0.8%
Obayashi 1802.T$12.8B-20%+5%8%12.3×-1.6%
Taisei 1801.T$10.8B-38%+2%9%9.9×0.6%
Shimizu 1803.T$8.30B-35%+6%6%7.8×n/a
Kajima 1812.T$12.5B-27%+4%8%10.8×-1.9%

How Toda compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Toda against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure1860.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+0.9%-2.2%9th highest of 21
6-month return-3.0%-6.9%8th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-17.4%-24.1%7th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+10.5%+8.5%9th highest of 21
Operating margin6.2%5.1%7th highest of 21
Forward P/E11.1×14.5×5th cheapest of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-0.8%-1.3%9th least demanding of 17
Growth delivered (Del g)+5.0%+9.5%5th lowest of 17
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-5.7 pp-9.9 pp7th most demanding of 17
ROIC minus cost of capital-0.7 pp+6.0 pp6th lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA10.6×8.6×4th most expensive of 15
Net debt / EBITDA2.7×0.1×4th most indebted of 18

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Toda 1860.TJapan$2.58B-3%+10%6%11.1×-0.8%+5.0%
Cemindia Projects CEMPRO.NSIndia$2.58B+36%+10%9%32.8×42.2%+29.9%
Tecnicas Reunidas TRE.MCSpain$2.57B-5%+33%4%13.5×-2.5%+12.9%
Bilfinger GBF.DEGermany$2.57B-31%+6%5%15.5×-6.7%+9.4%
Aecon ARE.TOCanada$2.59B-4%+23%2%26.3×5.1%+8.3%
Shanghai Tunnel Engineering 600820.SSChina$2.56B-9%-9%6%8.0×-0.6%+1.4%
Koninklijke Heijmans HEIJM.ASNetherlands$2.55B-7%+11%6%13.5×3.9%+9.7%
Keller KLR.LUnited Kingdom$2.63B+24%+10%7%11.8×4.4%+8.4%
Kalpataru Projects International KPIL.NSIndia$2.48B+6%+15%6%18.6×14.9%+16.0%
Bird Construction BDT.TOCanada$2.70B+28%+7%4%21.5×6.1%+17.7%
Arcplus 600629.SSChina$2.43B-17%-25%-3%38.4×n/an/a
AF Gruppen AFG.OLNorway$2.42B+13%+11%5%16.2×-9.7%+3.4%
Elecnor ENO.MCSpain$2.76B-30%+7%4%17.0×-4.9%+12.3%
Morgan Sindall MGNS.LUnited Kingdom$2.77B-7%+11%5%11.7×-4.7%+10.6%
Webuild WBD.MIItaly$2.39B-22%+2%-1%6.5×-2.1%+24.4%
Peab PEAB-B.STSweden$2.80B+5%+4%4%11.4×6.6%-0.4%
EXEO 1951.TJapan$2.84B-22%+18%7%12.2×-5.0%+6.6%
Shanghai Construction 600170.SSChina$2.89B-20%-22%1%16.7×-10.4%-2.3%
Jgc 1963.TJapan$2.94B-18%-15%6%10.0×n/an/a
Penta-Ocean Construction 1893.TJapan$2.25B-29%+7%7%8.9×n/an/a
ACME Solar ACMESOLAR.NSIndia$2.95B+32%+54%66%29.6×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Toda's main competitors?
Named competitors: Obayashi (1802.T), Taisei (1801.T), Shimizu (1803.T), Kajima (1812.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Cemindia Projects (CEMPRO.NS), Tecnicas Reunidas (TRE.MC), Bilfinger (GBF.DE), Aecon (ARE.TO), Shanghai Tunnel Engineering (600820.SS), Koninklijke Heijmans (HEIJM.AS).
Is Toda expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 11.1× against a peer median of 14.5×, 5th cheapest of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -1% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +5%, so the hurdle is -6 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Toda stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -3.0% against -6.9% for the median peer; over one year +31.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.