Loading…

Elecnor S.A.ENO.MCCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Spain · EUR·Industrials›Engineering & Construction

Spanish engineering and construction group building power lines, renewable plants and infrastructure, plus concessions.

≈ A smaller Quanta Services with renewable-concession assetsMomentum laggard 11
Mkt cap
$2.76B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
42%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$2.26M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
17.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+15.8 pp
WACC 7.4%
Hurdle
-17 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
118 days
4 Mar 2027
Close · EUR€29.05
1D+1.4%
1W+1.8%
1M-2.2%
3M-11.2%
6M-30.2%
YTD+18.8%
1Y+3.6%
ATR %3.2%
52w lowhigh31.2% off high

What Elecnor does

Spanish engineering and construction group building power lines, renewable plants and infrastructure, plus concessions.

Earns thin margins as a contractor, paid per project, so growth comes from winning work. Celeo, a joint venture with Dutch pension investor APG, holds transmission lines and solar plants that earn long-term regulated income.

In one line: A smaller Quanta Services with renewable-concession assets.

Products and services

  • Grid/transmission line construction
  • Renewable energy EPC
  • Concessions (Celeo)
  • Telecom infrastructure

Customers

  • Utilities
  • Governments
  • Renewable developers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Engineering & construction
  • Electrical infrastructure + renewables

What could go right

  • Grid investment cycle
  • Renewable buildout demand

What could go wrong

  • EPC margin competition
  • Project execution/weather risk

Moat: narrow (process know-how, installed base, scale). Deep grid-construction expertise and its own concession stakes, in a competitive EPC market.

Headquarters: Madrid, Spain · Founded: 1958 · Employees: 28,275

Named competitors

Elecnor at a glance

Size Elecnor (ENO.MC) is a Spain Industrials company (Engineering & Construction) with a market value of $2.76B, the 42nd largest of 97 Spain companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at €29.05 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 30.2%, against -6.0% for the median peer and +8.2% for the Spain market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 7.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +10.7%); the operating margin is 4.0% (peer median 5.8%).

Valuation It trades at 17.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 13.5× (7th most expensive of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -5% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +12%, so the hurdle is -17 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 15.8 points above its cost of capital (7.4% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 4 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 96ENO.MC 72
Six months, rebased to 100: Elecnor against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Elecnor financials

Reported figures in EUR; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue€4.38B€4.39B€3.81B€3.79B€3.39B
Revenue growth—+15%0%+12%—
Gross profit€747M€720M€436M€631M€577M
EBITDA€279M€298M€37.3M€110M€99.7M
Net income€129M€111M-€100M€110M€103M
Free cash flow€310M€375M€30.6M€108M€139M
Capital expenditure€113M€116M€96.9M€94.5M€83.1M
Total debtn/a€319M€259M€668M€1.04B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Elecnor competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%0%MGNSPEAB-BBDT1951600170KLRARE1963CEMPROACMESOLAR1860TREGBF603929BRAVLGN2386KPILENO.MC6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Elecnor is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%10×20×30×MGNSPEAB-BBDT1951600170KLRARE1963CEMPROACMESOLARTREGBF600820HEIJM603929BRAVLGN2386KPILENO.MCRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Elecnor is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%+60%0%25%50%MGNSPEAB-BBDT1951600170KLRARECEMPRO600820603929LGNKPILENO.MCGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Elecnor is the large dot.

Elecnor competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (ENO.MC vs PWR vs ACS.MC vs TSK.MC)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Elecnor ENO.MC$2.76B-30%+7%4%17.0×-4.9%
Quanta Services PWR$81.5B-27%+37%7%26.4×24.3%
ACS, Actividades de Construccion y Servicios ACS.MC$26.0B-37%+10%3%20.6×-2.6%
TSK Electronica y Electricidad TSK.MC$831M+10%+1%6%n/a9.9%

How Elecnor compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Elecnor against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureENO.MCPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-2.2%-1.9%10th lowest of 21
6-month return-30.2%-6.0%4th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-31.2%-23.4%7th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+7.0%+10.7%7th lowest of 21
Operating margin4.0%5.8%5th lowest of 21
Forward P/E17.0×13.5×7th most expensive of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-4.9%4.4%4th least demanding of 18
Growth delivered (Del g)+12.3%+9.4%7th highest of 18
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-17.2 pp-5.8 pp3rd least demanding of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital+15.8 pp+4.5 pp5th highest of 20
EV / EBITDA7.1×9.7×6th cheapest of 15
Net debt / EBITDA-1.7×0.3×3rd least indebted of 18

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Elecnor ENO.MCSpain$2.76B-30%+7%4%17.0×-4.9%+12.3%
Morgan Sindall MGNS.LUnited Kingdom$2.77B-7%+11%5%11.7×-4.7%+10.6%
Peab PEAB-B.STSweden$2.80B+5%+4%4%11.4×6.6%-0.4%
Bird Construction BDT.TOCanada$2.70B+28%+7%4%21.5×6.1%+17.7%
EXEO 1951.TJapan$2.84B-22%+18%7%12.2×-5.0%+6.6%
Shanghai Construction 600170.SSChina$2.89B-20%-22%1%16.7×-10.4%-2.3%
Keller KLR.LUnited Kingdom$2.63B+24%+10%7%11.8×4.4%+8.4%
Aecon ARE.TOCanada$2.59B-4%+23%2%26.3×5.1%+8.3%
Jgc 1963.TJapan$2.94B-18%-15%6%10.0×n/an/a
Cemindia Projects CEMPRO.NSIndia$2.58B+36%+10%9%32.8×42.2%+29.9%
ACME Solar ACMESOLAR.NSIndia$2.95B+32%+54%66%29.6×n/an/a
Toda 1860.TJapan$2.58B-3%+10%6%11.1×-0.8%+5.0%
Tecnicas Reunidas TRE.MCSpain$2.57B-5%+33%4%13.5×-2.5%+12.9%
Bilfinger GBF.DEGermany$2.57B-31%+6%5%15.5×-6.7%+9.4%
Shanghai Tunnel Engineering 600820.SSChina$2.56B-9%-9%6%8.0×-0.6%+1.4%
Koninklijke Heijmans HEIJM.ASNetherlands$2.55B-7%+11%6%13.5×3.9%+9.7%
L&K Engineering (Suzhou) 603929.SSChina$2.99B-50%+43%25%14.8×7.5%+39.5%
Bravida BRAV.STSweden$3.00B+30%+4%6%19.0×5.3%+5.9%
Legence LGNUnited States$3.02B-72%+69%3%12.2×29.7%+69.2%
SINOPEC Engineering (Group) 2386.HKHong Kong$3.05B-13%+14%2%9.0×n/an/a
Kalpataru Projects International KPIL.NSIndia$2.48B+6%+15%6%18.6×14.9%+16.0%

Questions

Who are Elecnor's main competitors?
Named competitors: Quanta Services (PWR), ACS (ACS.MC), Grupo TSK (TSK.MC), Comsa (private) (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Morgan Sindall (MGNS.L), Peab (PEAB-B.ST), Bird Construction (BDT.TO), EXEO (1951.T), Shanghai Construction (600170.SS), Keller (KLR.L).
Is Elecnor expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 17.0× against a peer median of 13.5×, 7th most expensive of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -5% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +12%, so the hurdle is -17 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Elecnor stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -30.2% against -6.0% for the median peer; over one year +3.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.