Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › KLR.L Keller Group plcOpen in the cockpit ↗

Keller Group plcKLR.LCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United Kingdom · GBP·Industrials›Engineering & Construction

UK-based geotechnical engineering contractor providing ground improvement and foundation engineering services worldwide.

≈ A UK geotechnical-engineering leaderMomentum neutral 49
Mkt cap
$2.63B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
96%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$8.59M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
11.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+10.0 pp
WACC 12.0%
Hurdle
-4 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
123 days
9 Mar 2027
Close · GBP£2,938
1D-2.0%
1W-7.7%
1M-7.5%
3M-4.0%
6M+24.4%
YTD+76.3%
1Y+100.4%
ATR %4.6%
52w lowhigh16.5% off high

What Keller does

UK-based geotechnical engineering contractor providing ground improvement and foundation engineering services worldwide.

Wins specialist subcontracts and bid contracts from main contractors and public owners; income is project-based, on fixed price or measured rates per unit, and margin depends on ground conditions and bid pricing. North America is its largest region.

In one line: A UK geotechnical-engineering leader.

Products and services

  • Ground improvement
  • Deep foundations
  • Geotechnical instrumentation/monitoring

Customers

  • Construction contractors & developers
  • Infrastructure/government projects

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Construction/engineering services
  • Ground improvement & foundation…

What could go right

  • Global infrastructure investment
  • Data center/renewable energy foundation demand

What could go wrong

  • Construction market cyclicality
  • Project execution/weather risk

Moat: narrow (scale, process know-how, installed base). Global scale and specialized geotechnical equipment/expertise are hard to replicate.

Headquarters: London, UK · Founded: 1860 · Employees: 10,000

Named competitors

Keller at a glance

Size Keller (KLR.L) is a United Kingdom Industrials company (Engineering & Construction) with a market value of $2.63B, the 141st largest of 363 United Kingdom companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at £2,938 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 24.4%, against -6.9% for the median peer and +3.6% for the United Kingdom market (cap-weighted) — 4th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 9.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +10.2%); the operating margin is 6.9% (peer median 5.1%).

Valuation It trades at 11.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.2× (7th cheapest of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is -4 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 10.0 points above its cost of capital (12.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 9 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012014011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026KLR.L 124Peer median 94
Six months, rebased to 100: Keller against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Keller financials

Reported figures in GBP; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue£3.24B£3.09B£2.99B£2.97B£2.94B
Revenue growth—+3%+1%+1%—
Gross profit£223M£1.29B£1.25B£1.16B£1.08B
EBITDA£335M£321M£320M£313M£207M
Net income£156M£143M£142M£89.4M£46.0M
Free cash flow£176M£172M£183M£104M-£22.8M
Capital expenditure£96.0M£90.4M£89.0M£94.5M£81.7M
Total debtn/a£310M£335M£389M£400M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Keller competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%-10%0%+10%ARECEMPRO1860TREBDTGBF600820ENOMGNSPEAB-BKPIL1951600629AFG600170WBD1963ACMESOLAR603929KLR.L6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Keller is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%10×20×30×ARECEMPRO1860TREBDTGBF600820HEIJMENOMGNSPEAB-BKPIL1951600629600170WBD1963ACMESOLAR603929KLR.LRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Keller is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%ARECEMPRO1860TREBDTGBF600820ENOPEAB-BKPIL1951AFG600170WBD603929KLR.LGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Keller is the large dot.

Keller competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (KLR.L vs DG.PA vs PAAL-B.CO vs SKA-B.ST)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Keller KLR.L$2.63B+24%+10%7%11.8×4.4%
Vinci DG.PA$69.8B-12%+4%12%12.2×-1.5%
Per Aarsleff Holding A/S PAAL-B.CO$2.02B-6%+14%5%13.4×-7.6%
Skanska SKA-B.ST$12.1B+16%-6%4%17.1×8.3%
HOCHTIEF Aktiengesellschaft HOT.DE$30.9B-31%+8%4%25.1×2.6%

How Keller compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Keller against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureKLR.LPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-7.5%-0.9%7th lowest of 21
6-month return+24.4%-6.9%4th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-16.5%-24.1%5th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+9.6%+10.2%10th lowest of 21
Operating margin6.9%5.1%5th highest of 21
Forward P/E11.8×15.2×7th cheapest of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)4.4%-0.8%7th most demanding of 18
Growth delivered (Del g)+8.4%+9.7%8th lowest of 18
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-4.0 pp-11.6 pp6th most demanding of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital+10.0 pp+4.4 pp8th highest of 20
EV / EBITDA6.2×9.2×4th cheapest of 14
Net debt / EBITDA0.3×0.1×8th most indebted of 17

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Keller KLR.LUnited Kingdom$2.63B+24%+10%7%11.8×4.4%+8.4%
Aecon ARE.TOCanada$2.59B-4%+23%2%26.3×5.1%+8.3%
Cemindia Projects CEMPRO.NSIndia$2.58B+36%+10%9%32.8×42.2%+29.9%
Toda 1860.TJapan$2.58B-3%+10%6%11.1×-0.8%+5.0%
Tecnicas Reunidas TRE.MCSpain$2.57B-5%+33%4%13.5×-2.5%+12.9%
Bird Construction BDT.TOCanada$2.70B+28%+7%4%21.5×6.1%+17.7%
Bilfinger GBF.DEGermany$2.57B-31%+6%5%15.5×-6.7%+9.4%
Shanghai Tunnel Engineering 600820.SSChina$2.56B-9%-9%6%8.0×-0.6%+1.4%
Koninklijke Heijmans HEIJM.ASNetherlands$2.55B-7%+11%6%13.5×3.9%+9.7%
Elecnor ENO.MCSpain$2.76B-30%+7%4%17.0×-4.9%+12.3%
Morgan Sindall MGNS.LUnited Kingdom$2.77B-7%+11%5%11.7×-4.7%+10.6%
Peab PEAB-B.STSweden$2.80B+5%+4%4%11.4×6.6%-0.4%
Kalpataru Projects International KPIL.NSIndia$2.48B+6%+15%6%18.6×14.9%+16.0%
EXEO 1951.TJapan$2.84B-22%+18%7%12.2×-5.0%+6.6%
Arcplus 600629.SSChina$2.43B-17%-25%-3%38.4×n/an/a
AF Gruppen AFG.OLNorway$2.42B+13%+11%5%16.2×-9.7%+3.4%
Shanghai Construction 600170.SSChina$2.89B-20%-22%1%16.7×-10.4%-2.3%
Webuild WBD.MIItaly$2.39B-22%+2%-1%6.5×-2.1%+24.4%
Jgc 1963.TJapan$2.94B-18%-15%6%10.0×n/an/a
ACME Solar ACMESOLAR.NSIndia$2.95B+32%+54%66%29.6×n/an/a
L&K Engineering (Suzhou) 603929.SSChina$2.99B-50%+43%25%14.8×7.5%+39.5%

Questions

Who are Keller's main competitors?
Named competitors: Vinci (Menard) (DG.PA), Bauer AG (private or unlisted), Per Aarsleff (PAAL-B.CO), Skanska (SKA-B.ST), Hochtief (HOT.DE). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Aecon (ARE.TO), Cemindia Projects (CEMPRO.NS), Toda (1860.T), Tecnicas Reunidas (TRE.MC), Bird Construction (BDT.TO), Bilfinger (GBF.DE).
Is Keller expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 11.8× against a peer median of 15.2×, 7th cheapest of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is -4 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Keller stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +24.4% against -6.9% for the median peer; over one year +100.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.