Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 1802.T Obayashi CorpOpen in the cockpit ↗

Obayashi Corp1802.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Industrials›Homebuilding

Major Japanese general contractor building infrastructure, skyscrapers and large public works projects.

≈ A Japanese Bechtel/Turner ConstructionMomentum weak 33
Mkt cap
$12.8B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
89%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$58.4M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
12.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+4.6 pp
WACC 7.2%
Hurdle
-10 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
7 days
13 Nov 2026
Close · JPY¥2,936
1D-5.8%
1W-2.0%
1M0.0%
3M-5.7%
6M-19.8%
YTD-9.1%
1Y+13.8%
ATR %2.8%
52w lowhigh33.0% off high

What Obayashi does

Major Japanese general contractor building infrastructure, skyscrapers and large public works projects.

Takes construction contracts by tender or negotiated order and books revenue as work progresses, so order backlog shows the work ahead. One of Japan's big four general contractors, it built a large overseas business, especially in the United States through Webcor, Kraemer and other acquired builders.

In one line: A Japanese Bechtel/Turner Construction.

Products and services

  • Building construction
  • Civil engineering/infrastructure
  • Real estate development

Customers

  • Government agencies
  • Corporations
  • Real estate developers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Construction/engineering
  • General contracting + civil engineering

What could go right

  • Data center construction boom
  • Infrastructure renewal spending

What could go wrong

  • Construction labor shortage/cost inflation
  • Cyclical order backlog

Moat: narrow (scale, brand, regulatory licence). Scale and track record win large public/infrastructure contracts, but construction margins are thin and cyclical.

Headquarters: Tokyo, Japan · Founded: 1892 · Employees: 18,031

Named competitors

Obayashi at a glance

Size Obayashi (1802.T) is a Japan Industrials company (Homebuilding) with a market value of $12.8B, the 110th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥2,936 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 19.8%, against -5.7% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 4.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +9.1%); the operating margin is 7.9% (peer median 8.6%).

Valuation It trades at 12.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 12.9× (10th cheapest of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -2% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is -10 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.6 points above its cost of capital (7.2% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 13 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 961802.T 80
Six months, rebased to 100: Obayashi against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Obayashi financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥2.69T¥2.59T¥2.59T¥2.33T¥1.98T
Revenue growth—0%+11%+17%—
Gross profit¥388B¥365B¥295B¥220B¥217B
EBITDA¥250B¥233B¥177B¥107B¥118B
Net income¥195B¥174B¥145B¥75.1B¥77.7B
Free cash flown/a¥127B¥34.2B-¥28.0B¥132B
Capital expendituren/a¥126B¥49.9B¥78.4B¥96.6B
Total debt¥356B¥356B¥374B¥333B¥344B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Obayashi competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%0%34071812659465329107910463837012180170139202650463619021920163266586580197351802.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Obayashi is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+5%+10%+15%+20%10×15×20×340718126594653291079104638370121801701392029101650463619021920163266586580197351802.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Obayashi is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%+30%0%20%340718126594653291076383701270139202650490219201658697351802.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Obayashi is the large dot.

Obayashi competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (1802.T vs 1812.T vs 1801.T vs 1803.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Obayashi 1802.T$12.8B-20%+5%8%12.3×-1.6%
Kajima 1812.T$12.5B-27%+4%8%10.8×-1.9%
Taisei 1801.T$10.8B-38%+2%9%9.9×0.6%
Shimizu 1803.T$8.30B-35%+6%6%7.8×n/a

How Obayashi compares with its peers

Peer set: Sector in the same market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Obayashi against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure1802.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return0.0%-8.5%7th highest of 21
6-month return-19.8%-5.7%8th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-33.0%-21.9%10th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+4.5%+9.1%7th lowest of 21
Operating margin7.9%8.6%7th lowest of 21
Forward P/E12.3×12.9×10th cheapest of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-1.6%6.4%4th least demanding of 18
Growth delivered (Del g)+7.9%+9.2%6th lowest of 18
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-9.6 pp-4.2 pp6th least demanding of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital+4.6 pp-0.7 pp4th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA7.8×10.2×6th cheapest of 20
Net debt / EBITDA-0.5×0.9×6th least indebted of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Sector in the same market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Obayashi 1802.TJapan$12.8B-20%+5%8%12.3×-1.6%+7.9%
Asahi Kasei 3407.TJapan$12.6B-3%+4%8%11.3×1.9%+7.9%
Kajima 1812.TJapan$12.5B-27%+4%8%10.8×-1.9%+10.0%
Nidec 6594.TJapan$11.7B-33%+4%-22%11.5×8.4%+10.9%
Baycurrent 6532.TJapan$11.2B+132%+32%33%35.6×6.4%+28.2%
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha 9107.TJapan$11.0B+17%+11%8%9.4×7.3%+10.2%
Mitsui O.s.k. Lines 9104.TJapan$15.0B+10%+20%6%7.3×n/an/a
Daifuku 6383.TJapan$10.9B-33%+21%15%18.9×14.7%+8.3%
Kawasaki Heavy Industries 7012.TJapan$10.9B-39%+9%6%13.8×20.2%+9.2%
Taisei 1801.TJapan$10.8B-38%+2%9%9.9×0.6%+7.1%
Ihi 7013.TJapan$15.4B-20%+8%10%12.7×16.7%+8.1%
Ana 9202.TJapan$9.77B+24%+17%8%13.1×-10.0%+28.4%
Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha 9101.TJapan$16.8B+17%0%6%9.0×7.8%+8.5%
Fuji Electric 6504.TJapan$9.68B-18%+9%12%13.1×11.3%+7.0%
Ebara 6361.TJapan$9.28B-40%+9%11%14.5×n/an/a
West Japan Railway 9021.TJapan$9.19B+12%+6%10%13.8×2.4%+14.9%
Japan Airlines 9201.TJapan$9.08B+34%+10%8%15.3×-9.7%+33.1%
Kubota 6326.TJapan$18.2B0%+13%11%10.0×7.5%+10.3%
Makita 6586.TJapan$8.78B-9%+9%14%16.6×0.6%+5.0%
Furukawa Electric 5801.TJapan$8.75B-54%+13%6%11.9×n/an/a
Secom 9735.TJapan$18.8B+16%+4%13%22.7×-0.3%+3.9%

Questions

Who are Obayashi's main competitors?
Named competitors: Kajima Corp (1812.T), Taisei Corp (1801.T), Shimizu Corp (1803.T), Takenaka Corp (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (sector in the same market, nearest in size) also includes Asahi Kasei (3407.T), Kajima (1812.T), Nidec (6594.T), Baycurrent (6532.T), Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha (9107.T), Mitsui O.s.k. Lines (9104.T).
Is Obayashi expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 12.3× against a peer median of 12.9×, 10th cheapest of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -2% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is -10 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Obayashi stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -19.8% against -5.7% for the median peer; over one year +13.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.