Loading…

Dongsuh026960.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Consumer Staples›Food: Major Diversified

Korean holding/trading company best known for its large stake in Dongsuh Foods, maker of Maxim instant coffee.

Momentum leader 92
Mkt cap
$2.06B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
30%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$1.44M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-2.3 pp
WACC 5.5%
Hurdle
+15 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · KRW₩28,400
1D-1.4%
1W-0.2%
1M+7.4%
3M+11.8%
6M+6.4%
YTD+5.8%
1Y+6.0%
ATR %3.0%
52w lowhigh7.0% off high

What Dongsuh does

Korean holding/trading company best known for its large stake in Dongsuh Foods, maker of Maxim instant coffee.

Its earnings are linked chiefly to its stake in the Dongsuh Foods joint venture, where Maxim's instant coffee is made and sold, rather than to its own manufacturing. Trading and food distribution are the other lines.

Products and services

  • Dongsuh Foods stake (Maxim coffee)
  • General trading
  • Food distribution

Customers

  • Korean retail/foodservice via Dongsuh Foods

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer holding/trading company
  • Investment in packaged-food JV (Maxim…
  • Import/export trading

What could go right

  • Maxim coffee/instant-beverage demand

What could go wrong

  • Reliance on JV dividend income
  • Coffee-bean cost swings

Moat: narrow (brand). Maxim is Korea's dominant instant-coffee brand, run via its Dongsuh Foods joint venture.

Headquarters: Seoul, South Korea · Founded: 1968 · Employees: 275

Named competitors

Dongsuh at a glance

Size Dongsuh (026960.KS) is a South Korea Consumer Staples company (Food: Major Diversified) with a market value of $2.06B, the 136th largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩28,400 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 6.4%, against -6.0% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — 7th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 6.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.1%); the operating margin is 7.9% (peer median 8.8%).

Valuation It trades at 3.8× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.1× (2nd most expensive of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 16% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +2%, so the hurdle is +15 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.3 points below its cost of capital (5.5% WACC).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026026960.KS 108Peer median 94
Six months, rebased to 100: Dongsuh against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Dongsuh financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₩538B₩533B₩489B₩490B₩556B
Revenue growth—+9%0%-12%—
Gross profit₩83.9B₩87.3B₩84.8B₩85.5B₩80.7B
EBITDA₩45.9B₩49.3B₩48.6B₩48.5B₩44.2B
Net income₩144B₩145B₩157B₩145B₩168B
Free cash flow₩127B₩103B₩112B₩113B₩81.5B
Capital expenditure₩1.96B₩2.14B₩1.26B₩3.03B₩3.03B
Total debt₩1.44B₩2.84B₩4.02B₩2.75B₩2.12B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Dongsuh competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%-20%0%+20%15792593CHAVC2002847HLFZYDUSWELL0008482805600305603057SMPL2809BBTCAGTF00052303451227600300603156026960.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Dongsuh is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%-10%0%+10%1×2×3×4×15792593CHAVC2002847HLFZYDUSWELL0008482805600305603057SMPL2809BBTCAGTF00052303451227600300603156026960.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Dongsuh is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+50%+100%+150%+200%0%100%200%1579CHAVC2002847HLFZYDUSWELL000848600305026960.KSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Dongsuh is the large dot.

Dongsuh competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (026960.KS vs 004370.KS vs 007310.KS vs NESN.SW)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
Dongsuh 026960.KS$2.06B+6%+6%8%3.8×16.2%
Nongshim 004370.KS$1.74B+8%+5%6%0.3×-16.1%
Otoki 007310.KS$879M-13%+4%5%0.4×-6.5%
Nestle NESN.SW$266B+11%-2%16%3.1×1.3%

How Dongsuh compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Dongsuh against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure026960.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+7.4%-1.0%6th highest of 21
6-month return+6.4%-6.0%7th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-7.0%-22.6%4th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+6.3%+5.1%8th highest of 21
Operating margin7.9%8.8%10th lowest of 21
EV / Sales3.8×1.1×2nd most expensive of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)16.2%-2.7%3rd most demanding of 17
Growth delivered (Del g)+1.6%+3.1%7th lowest of 17
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+14.6 pp-3.4 pp4th most demanding of 17
ROIC minus cost of capital-2.3 pp+3.8 pp3rd lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA44.6×8.1×most expensive of 12
Net debt / EBITDA-16.8×-0.3×least indebted of 13

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Dongsuh 026960.KSSouth Korea$2.06B+6%+6%8%3.8×16.2%+1.6%
Yihai International 1579.HKHong Kong$2.02B+3%+11%18%1.8×6.8%+3.6%
ITO EN,Ltd 2593.TJapan$2.12B+14%+5%5%0.7×n/an/a
Chagee Holdings Limited Unsponsored ADR CHAUnited States$2.44B+19%0%11%0.8×-4.1%+190.8%
Olam VC2.SISingapore$2.55B-29%-40%2%0.5×-3.7%-3.7%
Yankershop Food 002847.SZChina$1.64B-30%0%14%2.0×2.9%+24.1%
Herbalife HLFUnited States$1.60B+7%+6%9%0.6×-14.8%-1.9%
Zydus Wellness ZYDUSWELL.NSIndia$1.58B-7%+74%9%3.5×32.3%+16.2%
Cheng De Lolo 000848.SZChina$1.18B-11%+5%24%1.7×-10.8%+11.3%
S&B Foods 2805.TJapan$1.16B+53%+7%9%1.3×-1.8%+2.5%
Jiangsu Hengshun Vinegar-Industry 600305.SSChina$1.15B-7%+6%6%3.0×17.3%+2.6%
Shanghai Ziyan Foods 603057.SSChina$1.09B-37%+7%6%2.1×n/an/a
Simply Good Foods SMPLUnited States$1.05B-2%-7%13%1.0×-12.3%+6.2%
Kewpie 2809.TJapan$4.07B+11%+4%7%1.2×0.6%-0.7%
Bombay Burmah Trading BBTC.NSIndia$947M-18%+7%16%0.5×-8.8%+8.2%
AGT Food and Ingredients AGTF.TOCanada$922M+12%-19%-2%0.5×n/an/a
Hongmian Zhihui Science and Technology Innovation Co., Ltd. Guangzhou 000523.SZChina$798M-16%+4%2%2.6×12.1%-8.5%
Vitasoy International 0345.HKHong Kong$794M-3%-3%7%0.9×-9.8%-4.2%
Standard Foods 1227.TWTaiwan$751M-5%0%4%0.8×n/an/a
V V Food & Beverage 600300.SSChina$717M-18%+6%11%1.0×-9.2%-6.8%
Hebei Yangyuan Zhihui Beverage 603156.SSChina$6.06B-15%+12%28%5.8×9.9%+3.9%

Questions

Who are Dongsuh's main competitors?
Named competitors: Nongshim (004370.KS), Ottogi (007310.KS), Nestle (NESN.SW). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Yihai International (1579.HK), ITO EN,Ltd (2593.T), Chagee Holdings Limited Unsponsored ADR (CHA), Olam (VC2.SI), Yankershop Food (002847.SZ), Herbalife (HLF).
Is Dongsuh expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 3.8× against a peer median of 1.1×, 2nd most expensive of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 16% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +2%, so the hurdle is +15 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Dongsuh stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +6.4% against -6.0% for the median peer; over one year +6.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.