Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 003230.KS SamyangFoodOpen in the cockpit ↗

SamyangFood003230.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Consumer Staples›Food: Major Diversified

Korean instant-noodle maker best known globally for its spicy Buldak ramen line.

≈ A spicier, export-focused NissinMomentum leader 82
Mkt cap
$6.70B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
54%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$36.9M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
16.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+25.4 pp
WACC 5.4%
Hurdle
-36 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
12 days
18 Nov 2026
Close · KRW₩1,220,000
1D-0.6%
1W+7.2%
1M+0.2%
3M+0.1%
6M-9.0%
YTD-0.7%
1Y-3.0%
ATR %5.2%
52w lowhigh21.6% off high

What SamyangFood does

Korean instant-noodle maker best known globally for its spicy Buldak ramen line.

Sells packaged noodles through retailers; most of its sales now come from exports, driven by Buldak, whose spicy flavours spread through social media. Production is concentrated in Korea, so overseas orders depend on how fast it can build plants, including a second factory at Miryang.

In one line: A spicier, export-focused Nissin.

Products and services

  • Buldak spicy chicken ramen
  • Regular instant noodles
  • Snacks
  • Dairy/other foods

Customers

  • Export retailers (US, SE Asia, Europe)
  • Domestic Korean retail

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Packaged food
  • Instant noodles manufacturing
  • Branded export (Buldak)

What could go right

  • Global export growth (social media driven)
  • New overseas plants

What could go wrong

  • Fad/trend fade risk
  • Wheat/palm oil input costs

Moat: narrow (brand). Buldak brand became a global viral hit, giving pricing power and shelf space abroad.

Headquarters: Seoul, South Korea · Founded: 1961 · Employees: 3,025

Named competitors

SamyangFood at a glance

Size SamyangFood (003230.KS) is a South Korea Consumer Staples company (Food: Major Diversified) with a market value of $6.70B, the 61st largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩1,220,000 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 9.0%, against +6.4% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 14 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 37.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.1%); the operating margin is 22.6% (peer median 11.2%).

Valuation It trades at 16.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 20.9× (6th cheapest of 13).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +29%, so the hurdle is -36 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 25.4 points above its cost of capital (5.4% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 18 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 108003230.KS 93
Six months, rebased to 100: SamyangFood against the median of its 13 peers (local-currency closes).

SamyangFood financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₩2.75T₩2.35T₩1.73T₩1.19T₩909B
Revenue growth—+36%+45%+31%—
Gross profit₩1.21T₩1.04T₩720B₩408B₩245B
EBITDA₩700B₩588B₩391B₩179B₩115B
Net income₩488B₩389B₩272B₩126B₩79.8B
Free cash flow₩214B-₩147B₩127B₩116B-₩43.6B
Capital expenditure₩240B₩465B₩233B₩49.4B₩94.3B
Total debt₩673B₩503B₩373B₩342B₩281B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

SamyangFood competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%-20%0%300765CAG6031562809VC2CHAABFGIS3009991579NESTLEIND003230.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. SamyangFood is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-50%0%+50%+100%20×40×60×300765CAG6031562809VC2CHAABF2593300999NESTLEIND003230.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. SamyangFood is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+50%+100%+150%+200%0%100%200%300765CAG2809CHANESTLEIND003230.KSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. SamyangFood is the large dot.

SamyangFood competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (003230.KS vs 004370.KS vs 2897.T vs 2875.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
SamyangFood 003230.KS$6.70B-9%+38%23%16.3×-6.6%
Nongshim 004370.KS$1.74B+8%+5%6%11.8×-16.1%
Nissin Foods 2897.T$5.73B+9%+5%6%17.9×n/a
Toyo Suisan Kaisha 2875.T$6.74B-4%+7%17%14.5×-5.0%
Otoki 007310.KS$879M-13%+4%5%9.4×-6.5%

How SamyangFood compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

SamyangFood against its 13 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure003230.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+0.2%+7.7%5th lowest of 14
6-month return-9.0%+6.4%4th lowest of 14
Distance from 52-week high-21.6%-22.8%7th highest of 14
Revenue growth (TTM)+37.7%+4.1%2nd highest of 14
Operating margin22.6%11.2%3rd highest of 14
Forward P/E16.3×20.9×6th cheapest of 13
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-6.6%6.8%2nd least demanding of 12
Growth delivered (Del g)+29.4%+3.6%2nd highest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-36.0 pp+1.3 pp2nd least demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital+25.4 pp+3.4 pp4th highest of 14
EV / EBITDA12.9×10.3×3rd most expensive of 9
Net debt / EBITDA-0.1×0.3×5th least indebted of 10

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
SamyangFood 003230.KSSouth Korea$6.70B-9%+38%23%16.3×-6.6%+29.4%
CSPC Innovation Pharmaceutical 300765.SZChina$6.48B+14%+117%26%40.6×13.9%+10.5%
Conagra Brands CAGUnited States$7.28B+8%-2%11%10.6×-4.9%+0.2%
Hebei Yangyuan Zhihui Beverage 603156.SSChina$6.06B-15%+12%28%26.5×9.9%+3.9%
Kewpie 2809.TJapan$4.07B+11%+4%7%24.2×0.6%-0.7%
Olam VC2.SISingapore$2.55B-29%-40%2%17.6×-3.7%-3.7%
Chagee Holdings Limited Unsponsored ADR CHAUnited States$2.44B+19%0%11%7.9×-4.1%+190.8%
Associated British Foods ABF.LUnited Kingdom$18.7B+11%+1%7%13.5×7.8%+7.1%
General Mills GISUnited States$19.0B+2%-4%15%11.4×-6.7%+0.3%
ITO EN,Ltd 2593.TJapan$2.12B+14%+5%5%26.0×n/an/a
Yihai Kerry Arawana 300999.SZChina$21.3B-8%+2%1%37.3×n/an/a
Dongsuh 026960.KSSouth Korea$2.06B+6%+6%8%n/a16.2%+1.6%
Yihai International 1579.HKHong Kong$2.02B+3%+11%18%14.2×6.8%+3.6%
Nestle India NESTLEIND.NSIndia$26.0B-13%+22%21%59.4×36.6%+11.7%

Questions

Who are SamyangFood's main competitors?
Named competitors: Nongshim (004370.KS), Nissin Foods (2897.T), Toyo Suisan (2875.T), Ottogi (007310.KS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes CSPC Innovation Pharmaceutical (300765.SZ), Conagra Brands (CAG), Hebei Yangyuan Zhihui Beverage (603156.SS), Kewpie (2809.T), Olam (VC2.SI), Chagee Holdings Limited Unsponsored ADR (CHA).
Is SamyangFood expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 16.3× against a peer median of 20.9×, 6th cheapest of 13 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +29%, so the hurdle is -36 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has SamyangFood stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -9.0% against +6.4% for the median peer; over one year -3.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.