Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 002813.SZ Shenzhen Roadrover Technology Co. Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Shenzhen Roadrover Technology Co. Ltd. Class A002813.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Consumer Discretionary›Auto Parts: OEM
Momentum leader 97
Mkt cap
$470M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
96%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$22.3M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-18.6 pp
WACC 5.9%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · CNYCN¥26.12
1D-0.7%
1W+4.2%
1M+14.6%
3M+38.3%
6M-3.5%
YTD-10.0%
1Y-7.7%
ATR %5.4%
52w lowhigh21.7% off high

What Shenzhen Roadrover Technology does

Employees: 489

Shenzhen Roadrover Technology at a glance

Size Shenzhen Roadrover Technology (002813.SZ) is a China Consumer Discretionary company (Auto Parts: OEM) with a market value of $470M, the 4014th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥26.12 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 3.5%, against -24.4% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 5th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 13.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +7.1%); the operating margin is -15.8% (peer median 6.9%).

Valuation It trades at 9.0× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.5× (most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 18.6 points below its cost of capital (5.9% WACC).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026002813.SZ 95Peer median 76
Six months, rebased to 100: Shenzhen Roadrover Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Shenzhen Roadrover Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥360MCN¥373MCN¥360MCN¥283MCN¥339M
Revenue growth—+4%+27%-17%—
Gross profitCN¥55.6MCN¥37.8MCN¥67.6MCN¥61.8MCN¥64.4M
EBITDAn/a-CN¥81.7M-CN¥32.4M-CN¥5.88MCN¥24.4M
Net income-CN¥56.1M-CN¥93.7M-CN¥55.4M-CN¥27.4MCN¥3.29M
Free cash flow-CN¥34.4M-CN¥76.1M-CN¥56.9M-CN¥21.1MCN¥26.2M
Capital expenditureCN¥3.36MCN¥4.01MCN¥7.57MCN¥6.93MCN¥140,830
Total debtCN¥122MCN¥114MCN¥72.8MCN¥67.6MCN¥63.1M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Shenzhen Roadrover Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%0%7239MRE6880337236603409000570301499SWARAJENG603266003570688162NRBBEARING6031783003757292300745603037603390301186002813.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Shenzhen Roadrover Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%+20%0×2.5×5×7.5×7239MRE6880337236603409000570301499SWARAJENG603266003570688162NRBBEARING60317872923007456030376033903011861571002813.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Shenzhen Roadrover Technology is the large dot.

Shenzhen Roadrover Technology competitors and peer comparison

How Shenzhen Roadrover Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Shenzhen Roadrover Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure002813.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+14.6%-8.0%2nd highest of 21
6-month return-3.5%-24.4%5th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-21.7%-38.5%6th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-13.6%+7.1%2nd lowest of 21
Operating margin-15.8%6.9%2nd lowest of 21
EV / Sales9.0×1.5×most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-18.6 pp-1.0 pp2nd lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Shenzhen Roadrover Technology 002813.SZChina$470M-4%-14%-16%9.0×n/an/a
Tachi-S 7239.TJapan$474M+6%-2%5%0.1×-16.7%+6.3%
Martinrea International MRE.TOCanada$475M-10%-3%5%0.4×-6.2%+7.4%
Beijing Tianyishangjia New Material 688033.SSChina$459M-34%-31%-342%8.4×15.2%+10.6%
T.RAD 7236.TJapan$485M+17%+6%7%0.5×5.0%+7.5%
Hefei Conver 603409.SSChina$451M-45%+16%11%1.9×n/an/a
Changchai 000570.SZChina$450M-23%+1%2%1.0×7.2%+1.5%
Shanghai Vico Precision Mold & Plastics 301499.SZChina$450M-39%+16%4%2.7×n/an/a
Swaraj Engines SWARAJENG.NSIndia$450M-13%+25%12%1.9×19.1%+15.3%
Ningbo Tianlong Electronics 603266.SSChina$448M-26%+3%8%2.2×8.7%+6.3%
SNT DYNAMICS 003570.KSSouth Korea$446M-59%+9%8%0.8×n/an/a
Jee Technology 688162.SSChina$496M-25%+15%1%0.7×36.1%+23.7%
NRB Bearings NRBBEARING.NSIndia$442M+44%+14%13%3.0×27.7%+12.0%
Ningbo Shenglong Automotive Powertrain System 603178.SSChina$502M-27%-6%-10%2.2×22.3%+6.5%
Tianjin Pengling 300375.SZChina$439M-20%+7%2%1.1×21.7%+11.3%
Murakami 7292.TJapan$503M+3%+8%7%0.3×-19.1%+9.3%
Shinry Technologies 300745.SZChina$504M-41%+33%-4%1.0×n/an/a
Shanghai Carthane 603037.SSChina$504M-8%+15%9%3.9×25.0%+10.7%
Guangzhou Tongda Auto Electric 603390.SSChina$505M-28%+11%10%3.2×17.0%+9.5%
Nantong Chaoda Equipment 301186.SZChina$505M-38%+5%7%4.0×21.6%+11.9%
Xin Point 1571.HKHong Kong$437M-21%+1%19%0.6×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Shenzhen Roadrover Technology's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Tachi-S (7239.T), Martinrea International (MRE.TO), Beijing Tianyishangjia New Material (688033.SS), T.RAD (7236.T), Hefei Conver (603409.SS), Changchai (000570.SZ), Shanghai Vico Precision Mold & Plastics (301499.SZ), Swaraj Engines (SWARAJENG.NS).
Is Shenzhen Roadrover Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 9.0× against a peer median of 1.5×, most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has Shenzhen Roadrover Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -3.5% against -24.4% for the median peer; over one year -7.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.