Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 300745.SZ Shinry Technologies Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Shinry Technologies Co., Ltd. Class A300745.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Consumer Discretionary›Auto Parts: OEM
Momentum laggard 6
Mkt cap
$504M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
84%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$16.1M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
18.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-12.3 pp
WACC 12.2%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
173 days
28 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥19.93
1D-3.0%
1W+5.5%
1M-21.8%
3M-19.4%
6M-40.8%
YTD-22.6%
1Y-12.9%
ATR %6.3%
52w lowhigh65.3% off high

What Shinry Technologies does

Employees: 2,320

Shinry Technologies at a glance

Size Shinry Technologies (300745.SZ) is a China Consumer Discretionary company (Auto Parts: OEM) with a market value of $504M, the 3851st largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥19.93 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 40.8%, against -13.4% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 32.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.8%); the operating margin is -3.6% (peer median 5.6%).

Valuation It trades at 18.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 12.4× (3rd most expensive of 9).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 12.3 points below its cost of capital (12.2% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 28 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

5010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 85300745.SZ 50
Six months, rebased to 100: Shinry Technologies against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Shinry Technologies financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥3.46BCN¥2.67BCN¥2.23BCN¥1.41BCN¥1.51B
Revenue growth—+20%+58%-6%—
Gross profitCN¥523MCN¥321MCN¥222MCN¥133MCN¥179M
EBITDAn/a-CN¥54,200-CN¥13.9M-CN¥79.8MCN¥33.5M
Net income-CN¥59.2M-CN¥120M-CN¥122M-CN¥170M-CN¥27.8M
Free cash flow-CN¥70.7MCN¥207M-CN¥15.0M-CN¥316M-CN¥426M
Capital expenditureCN¥264MCN¥183MCN¥113MCN¥194MCN¥233M
Total debtCN¥1.02BCN¥958MCN¥798MCN¥704MCN¥1.01B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Shinry Technologies competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%-10%0%7292603037603390603178301186603085301119688162FIEMIND6039267279723672417246SHARDAMOTR300998HYLNMRE7239001282300745.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Shinry Technologies is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%+30%10×20×603085688162FIEMIND72417246MRE7239001282300745.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Shinry Technologies is the large dot.

Shinry Technologies competitors and peer comparison

How Shinry Technologies compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Shinry Technologies against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure300745.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-21.8%-9.2%2nd lowest of 21
6-month return-40.8%-13.4%lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-65.3%-36.3%lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+32.8%+6.8%2nd highest of 21
Operating margin-3.6%5.6%3rd lowest of 21
Forward P/E18.8×12.4×3rd most expensive of 9
ROIC minus cost of capital-12.3 pp-1.0 pp2nd lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Shinry Technologies 300745.SZChina$504M-41%+33%-4%18.8×n/an/a
Murakami 7292.TJapan$503M+3%+8%7%n/a-19.1%+9.3%
Shanghai Carthane 603037.SSChina$504M-8%+15%9%n/a25.0%+10.7%
Guangzhou Tongda Auto Electric 603390.SSChina$505M-28%+11%10%n/a17.0%+9.5%
Ningbo Shenglong Automotive Powertrain System 603178.SSChina$502M-27%-6%-10%n/a22.3%+6.5%
Nantong Chaoda Equipment 301186.SZChina$505M-38%+5%7%n/a21.6%+11.9%
Zhejiang Tenchen Controls 603085.SSChina$507M-31%+29%6%14.4×1.3%+16.2%
Hangzhou Zhengqiang 301119.SZChina$510M-20%+5%19%n/a19.9%+10.1%
Jee Technology 688162.SSChina$496M-25%+15%1%23.7×36.1%+23.7%
Fiem Industries FIEMIND.NSIndia$513M-19%+17%11%16.4×21.3%+18.2%
Tieliu 603926.SSChina$515M-32%-4%4%n/a6.6%+9.6%
Hi-Lex 7279.TJapan$520M-17%+32%1%n/a3.0%+9.2%
T.RAD 7236.TJapan$485M+17%+6%7%n/a5.0%+7.5%
Futaba Industrial 7241.TJapan$524M-5%+2%3%5.9×-3.8%+7.7%
Press Kogyo 7246.TJapan$525M+14%+11%7%10.5×-4.8%+5.6%
Sharda Motor Industries SHARDAMOTR.NSIndia$526M-5%+26%10%n/a16.7%+14.4%
Ningbo Fangzheng Automobile Mould 300998.SZChina$532M-5%+2%-3%n/a57.3%+14.9%
Hyliion HYLNUnited States$534M+22%+163%-649%n/an/an/a
Martinrea International MRE.TOCanada$475M-10%-3%5%4.2×-6.2%+7.4%
Tachi-S 7239.TJapan$474M+6%-2%5%8.3×-16.7%+6.3%
Wuhu Sanlian Forging 001282.SZChina$537M-23%+2%5%24.8×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are Shinry Technologies's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Murakami (7292.T), Shanghai Carthane (603037.SS), Guangzhou Tongda Auto Electric (603390.SS), Ningbo Shenglong Automotive Powertrain System (603178.SS), Nantong Chaoda Equipment (301186.SZ), Zhejiang Tenchen Controls (603085.SS), Hangzhou Zhengqiang (301119.SZ), Jee Technology (688162.SS).
Is Shinry Technologies expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 18.8× against a peer median of 12.4×, 3rd most expensive of 9 in its peer set.
How has Shinry Technologies stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -40.8% against -13.4% for the median peer; over one year -12.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.