Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 7236.T T.RAD Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

T.RAD Co., Ltd.7236.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Consumer Discretionary›Auto Parts: OEM
Momentum neutral 42
Mkt cap
$485M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
50%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$4.04M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
+0.1 pp
WACC 13.2%
Hurdle
-2 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
94 days
8 Feb 2027
Close · JPY¥1,297
1D-2.0%
1W-1.8%
1M-13.5%
3M-14.9%
6M+16.7%
YTD+58.0%
1Y+83.2%
ATR %3.3%
52w lowhigh19.5% off high

What T.RAD does

Employees: 4,087

T.RAD at a glance

Size T.RAD (7236.T) is a Japan Consumer Discretionary company (Auto Parts: OEM) with a market value of $485M, the 1086th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥1,297 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 16.7%, against -24.4% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 5.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +9.1%); the operating margin is 6.8% (peer median 5.0%).

Valuation It trades at 0.5× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.8× (5th cheapest of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 5% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +7%, so the hurdle is -2 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.1 points above its cost of capital (13.2% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 8 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20267236.T 89Peer median 77
Six months, rebased to 100: T.RAD against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

T.RAD financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥167B¥162B¥159B¥159B¥149B
Revenue growth—+2%0%+6%—
Gross profit¥23.7B¥24.4B¥21.5B¥16.3B¥13.2B
EBITDA¥17.6B¥16.9B¥13.0B¥10.6B¥7.40B
Net income¥9.01B¥8.77B¥4.25B¥1.25B-¥3.60B
Free cash flow¥6.28B¥5.11B¥2.52B¥10.9B-¥1.72B
Capital expenditure¥8.87B¥7.65B¥5.29B¥7.21B¥6.85B
Total debt¥22.7B¥21.9B¥21.5B¥24.9B¥22.4B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

T.RAD competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-20%0%MRE72396881620028136031787292300745603037603390301186603085301119688033FIEMIND6039267279603409000570301499SWARAJENG7236.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. T.RAD is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%0×2.5×5×7.5×MRE72396881620028136031787292300745603037603390301186603085301119688033FIEMIND6039267279603409000570301499SWARAJENG7236.TRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. T.RAD is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%20%40%MRE72396881626031787292603037603390603085301119688033FIEMIND6039267279000570SWARAJENG7236.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. T.RAD is the large dot.

T.RAD competitors and peer comparison

How T.RAD compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

T.RAD against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure7236.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-13.5%-8.0%6th lowest of 21
6-month return+16.7%-24.4%highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-19.5%-40.5%4th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+5.9%+9.1%10th lowest of 21
Operating margin6.8%5.0%9th highest of 21
EV / Sales0.5×1.8×5th cheapest of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)5.0%16.1%6th least demanding of 17
Growth delivered (Del g)+7.5%+9.9%5th lowest of 17
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-2.5 pp+4.2 pp7th least demanding of 17
ROIC minus cost of capital+0.1 pp-1.4 pp8th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA4.6×7.4×4th cheapest of 7
Net debt / EBITDA0.2×-1.4×2nd most indebted of 9

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
T.RAD 7236.TJapan$485M+17%+6%7%0.5×5.0%+7.5%
Martinrea International MRE.TOCanada$475M-10%-3%5%0.4×-6.2%+7.4%
Tachi-S 7239.TJapan$474M+6%-2%5%0.1×-16.7%+6.3%
Jee Technology 688162.SSChina$496M-25%+15%1%0.7×36.1%+23.7%
Shenzhen Roadrover Technology 002813.SZChina$470M-4%-14%-16%9.0×n/an/a
Ningbo Shenglong Automotive Powertrain System 603178.SSChina$502M-27%-6%-10%2.2×22.3%+6.5%
Murakami 7292.TJapan$503M+3%+8%7%0.3×-19.1%+9.3%
Shinry Technologies 300745.SZChina$504M-41%+33%-4%1.0×n/an/a
Shanghai Carthane 603037.SSChina$504M-8%+15%9%3.9×25.0%+10.7%
Guangzhou Tongda Auto Electric 603390.SSChina$505M-28%+11%10%3.2×17.0%+9.5%
Nantong Chaoda Equipment 301186.SZChina$505M-38%+5%7%4.0×21.6%+11.9%
Zhejiang Tenchen Controls 603085.SSChina$507M-31%+29%6%1.2×1.3%+16.2%
Hangzhou Zhengqiang 301119.SZChina$510M-20%+5%19%5.8×19.9%+10.1%
Beijing Tianyishangjia New Material 688033.SSChina$459M-34%-31%-342%8.4×15.2%+10.6%
Fiem Industries FIEMIND.NSIndia$513M-19%+17%11%1.6×21.3%+18.2%
Tieliu 603926.SSChina$515M-32%-4%4%1.4×6.6%+9.6%
Hi-Lex 7279.TJapan$520M-17%+32%1%0.1×3.0%+9.2%
Hefei Conver 603409.SSChina$451M-45%+16%11%1.9×n/an/a
Changchai 000570.SZChina$450M-23%+1%2%1.0×7.2%+1.5%
Shanghai Vico Precision Mold & Plastics 301499.SZChina$450M-39%+16%4%2.7×n/an/a
Swaraj Engines SWARAJENG.NSIndia$450M-13%+25%12%1.9×19.1%+15.3%

Questions

Which companies are T.RAD's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Martinrea International (MRE.TO), Tachi-S (7239.T), Jee Technology (688162.SS), Shenzhen Roadrover Technology (002813.SZ), Ningbo Shenglong Automotive Powertrain System (603178.SS), Murakami (7292.T), Shinry Technologies (300745.SZ), Shanghai Carthane (603037.SS).
Is T.RAD expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 0.5× against a peer median of 1.8×, 5th cheapest of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 5% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +7%, so the hurdle is -2 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has T.RAD stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +16.7% against -24.4% for the median peer; over one year +83.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.