Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 1571.HK Xin Point Holdings LimitedOpen in the cockpit ↗

Xin Point Holdings Limited1571.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Consumer Discretionary›Auto Parts: OEM
Momentum neutral 45
Mkt cap
$437M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
25%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$134,900
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
6.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+14.7 pp
WACC 5.5%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
144 days
30 Mar 2027
Close · HKDHK$3.40
1D-1.4%
1W+2.1%
1M-4.4%
3M-11.3%
6M-21.3%
YTD-11.2%
1Y-13.7%
ATR %2.4%
52w lowhigh26.7% off high

What Xin Point does

Employees: 5,118

Xin Point at a glance

Size Xin Point (1571.HK) is a Hong Kong Consumer Discretionary company (Auto Parts: OEM) with a market value of $437M, the 794th largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$3.40 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 21.3%, against -23.5% for the median peer and -13.4% for the Hong Kong market (cap-weighted) — 9th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 1.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.6%); the operating margin is 18.9% (peer median 4.6%).

Valuation It trades at 6.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 14.6× (cheapest of 7).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 14.7 points above its cost of capital (5.5% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 30 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

70809010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20261571.HK 77Peer median 77
Six months, rebased to 100: Xin Point against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Xin Point financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$3.41BHK$3.42BHK$3.48BHK$3.43BHK$3.35B
Revenue growth—-2%+1%+2%—
Gross profitHK$1.18BHK$1.12BHK$1.24BHK$1.19BHK$1.00B
EBITDAHK$1.02BHK$910MHK$955MHK$958MHK$748M
Net incomeHK$558MHK$574MHK$611MHK$671MHK$502M
Free cash flowHK$867MHK$905MHK$617MHK$698MHK$323M
Capital expenditureHK$276MHK$242MHK$278MHK$290MHK$194M
Total debtn/aHK$44.8MHK$129MHK$184MHK$310M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Xin Point competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%-10%0%3003756031615992NRBBEARING4246003570603266002355SWARAJENG30149900057060340960378860300668803360394930156000281300236372391571.HK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Xin Point is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%10×20×NRBBEARING4246003570SWARAJENG68803372391571.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Xin Point is the large dot.

Xin Point competitors and peer comparison

How Xin Point compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Xin Point against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure1571.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-4.4%-8.9%4th highest of 21
6-month return-21.3%-23.5%9th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-26.7%-35.8%6th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+1.3%+6.6%7th lowest of 20
Operating margin18.9%4.6%highest of 20
Forward P/E6.3×14.6×cheapest of 7
ROIC minus cost of capital+14.7 pp-1.5 pp2nd highest of 20
EV / EBITDA1.9×13.8×cheapest of 10
Net debt / EBITDA-1.5×-0.2×4th least indebted of 10

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Xin Point 1571.HKHong Kong$437M-21%+1%19%6.3×n/an/a
Tianjin Pengling 300375.SZChina$439M-20%+7%2%n/a21.7%+11.3%
Kehua 603161.SSChina$433M-12%n/an/an/an/an/a
Chuo Spring 5992.TJapan$433M-28%+2%2%n/an/an/a
NRB Bearings NRBBEARING.NSIndia$442M+44%+14%13%28.2×27.7%+12.0%
DaikyoNishikawa 4246.TJapan$431M+17%-3%6%7.3×-5.1%+2.0%
SNT DYNAMICS 003570.KSSouth Korea$446M-59%+9%8%8.9×n/an/a
Ningbo Tianlong Electronics 603266.SSChina$448M-26%+3%8%n/a8.7%+6.3%
Xingmin Intelligent Transportation Systems (Group) 002355.SZChina$426M-29%+20%-19%n/an/an/a
Swaraj Engines SWARAJENG.NSIndia$450M-13%+25%12%20.4×19.1%+15.3%
Shanghai Vico Precision Mold & Plastics 301499.SZChina$450M-39%+16%4%n/an/an/a
Changchai 000570.SZChina$450M-23%+1%2%n/a7.2%+1.5%
Hefei Conver 603409.SSChina$451M-45%+16%11%n/an/an/a
Ningbo Gaofa Automotive Control System 603788.SSChina$424M-25%+3%11%n/a-0.2%+12.1%
Shanghai Lianming Machinery 603006.SSChina$418M-19%+17%8%n/a18.6%-5.1%
Beijing Tianyishangjia New Material 688033.SSChina$459M-34%-31%-342%22.7×15.2%+10.6%
Xuelong 603949.SSChina$416M-26%+10%17%n/an/an/a
PXI Auto Components Suzhou 301560.SZChina$415M-24%+8%2%n/an/an/a
Shenzhen Roadrover Technology 002813.SZChina$470M-4%-14%-16%n/an/an/a
Shandong Longji Machinery 002363.SZChina$405M-23%-16%4%n/a6.8%+5.0%
Tachi-S 7239.TJapan$474M+6%-2%5%8.3×-16.7%+6.3%

Questions

Which companies are Xin Point's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Tianjin Pengling (300375.SZ), Kehua (603161.SS), Chuo Spring (5992.T), NRB Bearings (NRBBEARING.NS), DaikyoNishikawa (4246.T), SNT DYNAMICS (003570.KS), Ningbo Tianlong Electronics (603266.SS), Xingmin Intelligent Transportation Systems (Group) (002355.SZ).
Is Xin Point expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 6.3× against a peer median of 14.6×, cheapest of 7 in its peer set.
How has Xin Point stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -21.3% against -23.5% for the median peer; over one year -13.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.