Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 002116.SZ China Haisum Engineering Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

China Haisum Engineering Co., Ltd. Class A002116.SZCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Industrials›Engineering & Construction
Momentum strong 63
Mkt cap
$573M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$6.23M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
11.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
n/a
WACC 5.9%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
174 days
29 Apr 2027
Close · CNYCN¥6.83
1D-1.0%
1W+4.3%
1M-4.5%
3M-5.0%
6M-15.8%
YTD-20.3%
1Y-23.0%
ATR %3.0%
52w lowhigh30.5% off high

What China Haisum Engineering does

Employees: 4,401

China Haisum Engineering at a glance

Size China Haisum Engineering (002116.SZ) is a China Industrials company (Engineering & Construction) with a market value of $573M, the 3537th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥6.83 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 15.8%, against -15.7% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 10th highest of 19 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 6.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +12.3%); the operating margin is 4.8% (peer median 4.8%).

Valuation It trades at 11.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 13.5× (4th cheapest of 9).

Next results Next results expected around 29 Apr 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 84002116.SZ 84
Six months, rebased to 100: China Haisum Engineering against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

China Haisum Engineering financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥6.42BCN¥6.94BCN¥6.81BCN¥6.62BCN¥5.70B
Revenue growth—+2%+3%+16%—
Gross profitCN¥1.13BCN¥1.02BCN¥985MCN¥910MCN¥716M
EBITDAn/aCN¥411MCN¥375MCN¥356MCN¥199M
Net incomeCN¥283MCN¥341MCN¥335MCN¥310MCN¥207M
Free cash flow-CN¥286M-CN¥185MCN¥181M-CN¥359MCN¥812M
Capital expenditureCN¥65.0MCN¥79.1MCN¥96.6MCN¥122MCN¥92.4M
Total debtCN¥28.6MCN¥52.2MCN¥83.0MCN¥132MCN¥110M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

China Haisum Engineering competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-20%-10%0%+10%ASYP9DNYAB0005056886793007121870OHLA603126000886CAPINVIT251500298917571975301632LYL600853002116.SZ6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. China Haisum Engineering is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%+20%20×40×ASYP9DITGNYAB30071218702515LYL002116.SZRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. China Haisum Engineering is the large dot.

China Haisum Engineering competitors and peer comparison

How China Haisum Engineering compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

China Haisum Engineering against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure002116.SZPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-4.5%-8.6%9th highest of 21
6-month return-15.8%-15.7%10th highest of 19
Distance from 52-week high-30.5%-37.0%9th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-6.3%+12.3%5th lowest of 21
Operating margin4.8%4.8%11th highest of 21
Forward P/E11.9×13.5×4th cheapest of 9

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
China Haisum Engineering 002116.SZChina$573M-16%-6%5%11.9×n/an/a
Assystem ASY.PAFrance$574M-16%+4%5%15.7×11.1%+8.4%
Civmec P9D.SISingapore$570M-1%+19%9%13.1×n/an/a
ITG ITGUnited States$568Mn/a+16%7%5.6×n/an/a
Nyab NYAB.STSweden$566M+29%+21%6%14.2×-5.8%+244.6%
Hainan Jingliang 000505.SZChina$583M-14%-19%-4%n/an/an/a
InstallatorGruppen A/S IG.CODenmark$584Mn/a+51%4%n/a9.1%+50.8%
Anhui Tongyuan Environment Energy Saving 688679.SSChina$586M-43%-17%0%n/an/an/a
Fujian Yongfu Power Engineering 300712.SZChina$558M-26%-16%-1%43.1×36.9%+11.7%
Yahagi Construction 1870.TJapan$557M-4%+3%7%8.8×-3.5%+9.7%
Obrascon Huarte Lain OHLA.MCSpain$556M-20%-3%4%n/an/an/a
Sinoma Energy Conservation 603126.SSChina$553M-26%+47%1%n/an/an/a
Hainan Expressway 000886.SZChina$598M-27%+185%-12%n/an/an/a
Capital Infra Trust CAPINVIT.NSIndia$548M+13%+421%55%n/a-4.0%n/a
BES Engineering 2515.TWTaiwan$546M-14%+1%5%8.4×12.2%+9.0%
Shenzhen Strongteam Decoration Engineering 002989.SZChina$540M-39%+2%-29%n/an/an/a
Global Chinese Business Club 1757.HKHong Kong$610M-78%+121%1%n/an/an/a
Asahi Kogyosha 1975.TJapan$537M-15%+17%11%n/a-3.1%+8.3%
Guangdong Provincial Academy of Building Research 301632.SZChina$537M-43%+13%7%n/an/an/a
Lycopodium LYL.AXAustralia$536M+51%+12%12%13.9×-2.5%+18.8%
Longjian Road & Bridge 600853.SSChina$532M-12%-10%5%n/a5.9%+8.3%

Questions

Which companies are China Haisum Engineering's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Assystem (ASY.PA), Civmec (P9D.SI), ITG (ITG), Nyab (NYAB.ST), Hainan Jingliang (000505.SZ), InstallatorGruppen A/S (IG.CO), Anhui Tongyuan Environment Energy Saving (688679.SS), Fujian Yongfu Power Engineering (300712.SZ).
Is China Haisum Engineering expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 11.9× against a peer median of 13.5×, 4th cheapest of 9 in its peer set.
How has China Haisum Engineering stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -15.8% against -15.7% for the median peer; over one year -23.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.