Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › IG.CO InstallatorGruppen A/SOpen in the cockpit ↗

InstallatorGruppen A/SIG.COCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Denmark · DKK·Industrials›Engineering & Construction
Mkt cap
$584M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
51%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$366,254
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
+0.1 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-42 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · DKKDKK 12.84
1D+4.7%
1W+1.5%
1M+16.2%
3M+6.8%
6Mn/a
YTDn/a
1Yn/a
ATR %3.7%
52w lowhigh17.1% off high

What InstallatorGruppen A/S does

Employees: 2,158

InstallatorGruppen A/S at a glance

Size InstallatorGruppen A/S (IG.CO) is a Denmark Industrials company (Engineering & Construction) with a market value of $584M, the 47th largest of 59 Denmark companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at DKK 12.84 on 6 Nov 2026.

Growth Revenue grew 50.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.6%); the operating margin is 3.8% (peer median 5.1%).

Valuation It trades at 1.3× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.1× (9th most expensive of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +51%, so the hurdle is -42 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.1 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

InstallatorGruppen A/S financials

Reported figures in DKK; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023
Revenuen/aDKK 3.71BDKK 2.46BDKK 1.40B
Revenue growth—+51%+76%—
Gross profitn/aDKK 395MDKK 271MDKK 70.7M
EBITDAn/aDKK 339MDKK 226MDKK 155M
Net incomen/aDKK 74.9MDKK 43.9M-DKK 14.6M
Free cash flown/aDKK 322MDKK 73.3MDKK 73.9M
Capital expendituren/aDKK 23.2MDKK 12.5MDKK 20.0M
Total debtn/aDKK 849MDKK 498MDKK 166M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

InstallatorGruppen A/S competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%+150%+200%0×2×4×6×000505688679ASY002116000886P9DITG1757300712OHLA603126002573CAPINVIT5534IG.CORevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. InstallatorGruppen A/S is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+100%+200%0%100%200%ASYNYAB30071218700025739621IG.COGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. InstallatorGruppen A/S is the large dot.

InstallatorGruppen A/S competitors and peer comparison

How InstallatorGruppen A/S compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

InstallatorGruppen A/S against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureIG.COPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+16.2%-7.4%highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-17.1%-35.6%4th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+50.8%+5.6%4th highest of 21
Operating margin3.8%5.1%8th lowest of 21
EV / Sales1.3×1.1×9th most expensive of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)9.1%5.5%5th most demanding of 11
Growth delivered (Del g)+50.8%+9.7%2nd highest of 10
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-41.6 pp-8.6 pp2nd least demanding of 10
ROIC minus cost of capital+0.1 pp-1.8 pp8th highest of 20
EV / EBITDA14.1×9.9×3rd most expensive of 13
Net debt / EBITDA2.7×1.1×5th most indebted of 15

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
InstallatorGruppen A/S IG.CODenmark$584Mn/a+51%4%1.3×9.1%+50.8%
Hainan Jingliang 000505.SZChina$583M-14%-19%-4%0.8×n/an/a
Anhui Tongyuan Environment Energy Saving 688679.SSChina$586M-43%-17%0%3.0×n/an/a
Assystem ASY.PAFrance$574M-16%+4%5%0.9×11.1%+8.4%
China Haisum Engineering 002116.SZChina$573M-16%-6%5%0.2×n/an/a
Hainan Expressway 000886.SZChina$598M-27%+185%-12%3.7×n/an/a
Civmec P9D.SISingapore$570M-1%+19%9%1.0×n/an/a
ITG ITGUnited States$568Mn/a+16%7%1.2×n/an/a
Nyab NYAB.STSweden$566M+29%+21%6%0.9×-5.8%+244.6%
Global Chinese Business Club 1757.HKHong Kong$610M-78%+121%1%9.0×n/an/a
Fujian Yongfu Power Engineering 300712.SZChina$558M-26%-16%-1%3.1×36.9%+11.7%
Yahagi Construction 1870.TJapan$557M-4%+3%7%0.5×-3.5%+9.7%
Obrascon Huarte Lain OHLA.MCSpain$556M-20%-3%4%0.1×n/an/a
Sinoma Energy Conservation 603126.SSChina$553M-26%+47%1%1.2×n/an/a
Beijing SPC Environment Protection Tech 002573.SZChina$619M-22%+1%-2%1.7×5.2%+13.7%
CTI Engineering 9621.TJapan$619M+22%+8%9%0.6×-9.0%+9.2%
Capital Infra Trust CAPINVIT.NSIndia$548M+13%+421%55%5.8×-4.0%n/a
BES Engineering 2515.TWTaiwan$546M-14%+1%5%1.5×12.2%+9.0%
Chong Hong Development 5534.TWTaiwan$625M-16%-18%24%4.2×n/an/a
Limbach LMBUnited States$627M-36%+21%6%1.1×12.6%+2.6%
Transrail Lighting TRANSRAILL.NSIndia$628M-25%+14%11%0.8×5.9%+25.9%

Questions

Which companies are InstallatorGruppen A/S's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Hainan Jingliang (000505.SZ), Anhui Tongyuan Environment Energy Saving (688679.SS), Assystem (ASY.PA), China Haisum Engineering (002116.SZ), Hainan Expressway (000886.SZ), Civmec (P9D.SI), ITG (ITG), Nyab (NYAB.ST).
Is InstallatorGruppen A/S expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 1.3× against a peer median of 1.1×, 9th most expensive of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +51%, so the hurdle is -42 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.