Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 000120.KS Cj LogisticsOpen in the cockpit ↗

Cj Logistics000120.KSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

South Korea · KRW·Industrials›Marine Shipping

Korea's largest logistics/parcel-delivery company, providing e-commerce fulfillment, contract logistics and global freight forwarding.

Momentum strong 63
Mkt cap
$1.01B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
39%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$2.31M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
7.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-0.7 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-7 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
4 days
10 Nov 2026
Close · KRW₩68,600
1D-1.3%
1W+3.9%
1M-2.4%
3M-9.7%
6M-32.1%
YTD-26.9%
1Y-16.5%
ATR %2.8%
52w lowhigh55.1% off high

What Cj Logistics does

Korea's largest logistics/parcel-delivery company, providing e-commerce fulfillment, contract logistics and global freight forwarding.

Is paid per parcel for delivery and under multi-year contracts to run warehouses for retailers and manufacturers, so parcel income tracks online-shopping volumes while contract logistics is steadier. CJ Corp, the group's holding company, is its controlling shareholder.

Products and services

  • Parcel delivery
  • Contract/warehouse logistics
  • Global freight forwarding

Customers

  • E-commerce platforms
  • Retailers/manufacturers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Logistics
  • Parcel delivery and contract logistics
  • Global freight forwarding

What could go right

  • E-commerce parcel-volume growth
  • Global freight-forwarding expansion

What could go wrong

  • Delivery-fee price competition
  • Fuel/labor cost inflation

Moat: narrow (scale, installed base). Largest domestic parcel network and warehouse footprint, hard to replicate quickly.

Headquarters: Seoul, South Korea · Founded: 1930 · Employees: 6,847

Named competitors

  • Hanjin Transportation private or unlisted
  • Lotte Global Logistics private or unlisted

Cj Logistics at a glance

Size Cj Logistics (000120.KS) is a South Korea Industrials company (Marine Shipping) with a market value of $1.01B, the 232nd largest of 495 South Korea companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₩68,600 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 32.1%, against +0.4% for the median peer and -24.5% for the South Korea market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 5.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.2%); the operating margin is 3.9% (peer median 33.3%).

Valuation It trades at 7.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 9.5× (6th cheapest of 19).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +3%, so the hurdle is -7 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.7 points below its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 10 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 101000120.KS 68
Six months, rebased to 100: Cj Logistics against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Cj Logistics financials

Reported figures in KRW; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₩12.8T₩12.3T₩12.1T₩11.8T₩12.1T
Revenue growth—+1%+3%-3%—
Gross profit₩1.28T₩1.28T₩1.31T₩1.23T₩1.13T
EBITDA₩1.19T₩1.16T₩1.14T₩1.06T₩912B
Net income₩223B₩242B₩241B₩207B₩163B
Free cash flow₩173B₩308B₩403B₩556B₩344B
Capital expenditure₩631B₩610B₩239B₩318B₩305B
Total debt₩4.23T₩4.27T₩3.90T₩3.57T₩4.15T

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Cj Logistics competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%-20%0%+20%9119ODFDIS20202607GNKGPPLALCCCECSBMPCC600017DFDSSOMAHSHPGSLDNORD9302000120.KS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Cj Logistics is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+100%+200%0×50×100×150×9119ODF2020GNK600017HSHP000120.KSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Cj Logistics is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%0%20%ODFDIS2020GPPLSBMPCCDFDSSOMAHSHPGSL9302000120.KSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Cj Logistics is the large dot.

Cj Logistics competitors and peer comparison

How Cj Logistics compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Cj Logistics against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure000120.KSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-2.4%-5.4%6th highest of 21
6-month return-32.1%+0.4%lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-55.1%-15.4%2nd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+5.4%+6.2%9th lowest of 20
Operating margin3.9%33.3%3rd lowest of 20
Forward P/E7.8×9.5×6th cheapest of 19
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-4.0%-2.5%5th least demanding of 12
Growth delivered (Del g)+2.6%+9.6%2nd lowest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-6.7 pp-12.6 pp5th most demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital-0.7 pp+2.4 pp6th lowest of 19
EV / EBITDA4.6×6.8×4th cheapest of 19
Net debt / EBITDA3.2×1.3×5th most indebted of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Cj Logistics 000120.KSSouth Korea$1.01B-32%+5%4%7.8×-4.0%+2.6%
Iino Kaiun Kaisha,Ltd 9119.TJapan$1.04B-6%+1%11%11.6×n/an/a
Odfjell ODF.OLNorway$960M+3%-10%18%6.9×-12.7%+5.6%
d'Amico International Shipping DIS.MIItaly$1.09B-3%-15%36%8.0×-7.3%+2.3%
2020 Bulkers 2020.OLNorway$1.10B+20%+256%92%170.2×9.2%+7.3%
Evergreen International Storage & Transport 2607.TWTaiwan$897M+18%-15%11%n/an/an/a
Genco Shipping & Trading GNKUnited States$1.13B0%+26%17%10.2×n/an/a
Volare Shipping VLCC.OLNorway$1.17Bn/an/an/an/an/an/a
Gujarat Pipavav Port GPPL.NSIndia$851M+4%+25%52%14.7×16.2%+9.6%
Algoma Central ALC.TOCanada$846M+30%+18%34%13.6×n/an/a
Capital Clean Energy Carriers CCECUnited States$1.24B+3%+5%50%8.1×n/an/a
Safe Bulkers SBUnited States$809M+1%+11%33%9.4×3.6%+6.8%
MPC Container Ships MPCC.OLNorway$1.26B0%-15%37%7.8×-13.3%+27.1%
Rizhao Port 600017.SSChina$1.26B-7%+3%13%17.1×n/an/a
Dfds A/s DFDS.CODenmark$1.33B+8%+3%3%17.0×4.6%+17.2%
Solstad Maritime SOMA.OLNorway$1.36B-6%+17%40%5.5×-2.5%+22.7%
Himalaya Shipping HSHP.OLNorway$729M-2%+36%61%7.5×-3.3%+36.0%
Global Ship Lease GSLUnited States$1.41B-8%+6%48%4.1×-15.2%+22.1%
Dampskibsselskabet NORDEN A/S DNORD.CODenmark$1.46B+15%+7%3%9.6×n/an/a
MITSUI-SOKO 9302.TJapan$1.52B-22%+6%7%17.8×-1.6%+3.4%
Klaveness Combination Carriers KCC.OLNorway$661M0%+21%26%5.8×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Cj Logistics's main competitors?
Named competitors: Hanjin Transportation (private or unlisted), Lotte Global Logistics (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Iino Kaiun Kaisha,Ltd (9119.T), Odfjell (ODF.OL), d'Amico International Shipping (DIS.MI), 2020 Bulkers (2020.OL), Evergreen International Storage & Transport (2607.TW), Genco Shipping & Trading (GNK).
Is Cj Logistics expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 7.8× against a peer median of 9.5×, 6th cheapest of 19 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +3%, so the hurdle is -7 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Cj Logistics stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -32.1% against +0.4% for the median peer; over one year -16.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.