Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › WRT1V.HE Wartsila Oyj AbpOpen in the cockpit ↗

Wartsila Oyj AbpWRT1V.HECompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Finland · EUR·Industrials›Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery

Finnish maker of marine engines/propulsion and flexible power-generation systems.

Momentum laggard 13
Mkt cap
$17.1B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
79%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$44.5M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
23.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+80.5 pp
WACC 11.6%
Hurdle
-1 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
91 days
5 Feb 2027
Close · EUR€25.81
1D+3.5%
1W+0.7%
1M-11.3%
3M-12.2%
6M-24.9%
YTD-15.1%
1Y-6.7%
ATR %4.2%
52w lowhigh36.7% off high

What Wartsila Oyj Abp does

Finnish maker of marine engines/propulsion and flexible power-generation systems.

Sells engines and power plants against orders that take months or years to deliver, then earns recurring revenue from service agreements, spare parts and upgrades over decades. Services carry the steadier part; ship engine orders follow newbuild cycles, and power plant orders are large and uneven.

Products and services

  • Marine engines & propulsion
  • Marine services
  • Flexible/gas power plants
  • Energy storage

Customers

  • Shipbuilders/ship owners, power utilities, industr

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Marine & energy equipment
  • Engines, propulsion & power plants

What could go right

  • Marine newbuild and retrofit demand
  • Renewable-integration power plant orders

What could go wrong

  • Shipping industry cyclicality
  • Power plant order lumpiness

Moat: narrow (installed base, process know-how, switching costs). Large installed base of marine engines and power plants drives recurring service revenue.

Headquarters: Helsinki, Finland · Founded: 1834 · Employees: 17,879

Named competitors

Wartsila Oyj Abp at a glance

Size Wartsila Oyj Abp (WRT1V.HE) is a Finland Industrials company (Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) with a market value of $17.1B, the 7th largest of 65 Finland companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at €25.81 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 24.9%, against -10.8% for the median peer and -2.9% for the Finland market (cap-weighted) — 9th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 2.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +9.1%); the operating margin is 13.0% (peer median 13.3%).

Valuation It trades at 23.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 13.2× (6th most expensive of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is -1 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 80.5 points above its cost of capital (11.6% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 5 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

70809010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 90WRT1V.HE 71
Six months, rebased to 100: Wartsila Oyj Abp against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Wartsila Oyj Abp financials

Reported figures in EUR; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue€6.61B€6.91B€6.45B€6.01B€5.84B
Revenue growth—+7%+7%+3%—
Gross profit€957M€1.48B€1.36B€1.02B€687M
EBITDA€1.03B€950M€767M€581M€449M
Net income€601M€626M€503M€257M-€65.0M
Free cash flow€1.56B€1.45B€1.04B€673M-€216M
Capital expenditure€176M€150M€170M€148M€154M
Total debt€548M€582M€766M€859M€949M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Wartsila Oyj Abp competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-60%-40%-20%0%-20%0%6326METSO329180CNH034020BS6000425009540380860311766ASHOKLEYEPI-A010140TTC6301WEIRMAZDOCKAGCOWRT1V.HE6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Wartsila Oyj Abp is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%+30%+40%10×20×30×6326METSO329180CNH034020BS6000425009540380860311766ASHOKLEY042660EPI-A010140TTC6301WEIRMAZDOCKAGCOWRT1V.HERevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Wartsila Oyj Abp is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%-10%0%+10%+20%-20%0%20%6326METSO329180CNH034020BS6000425380860311766042660EPI-A010140TTC6301WEIRAGCOWRT1V.HEGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Wartsila Oyj Abp is the large dot.

Wartsila Oyj Abp competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (WRT1V.HE vs RR..L vs CAT vs ENR.DE)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Wartsila Oyj Abp WRT1V.HE$17.1B-25%-2%13%23.5×7.2%
Rolls-Royce RR..L$140B+6%+19%18%28.5×24.6%
Caterpillar CAT$257B-38%+20%19%18.8×18.0%
Siemens Energy ENR.DE$111B-33%+9%9%26.4×17.3%

How Wartsila Oyj Abp compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Wartsila Oyj Abp against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureWRT1V.HEPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-11.3%-6.5%8th lowest of 21
6-month return-24.9%-10.8%9th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-36.7%-27.5%8th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-2.3%+9.1%lowest of 21
Operating margin13.0%13.3%9th lowest of 21
Forward P/E23.5×13.2×6th most expensive of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)7.2%5.6%9th most demanding of 18
Growth delivered (Del g)+8.5%+9.6%9th lowest of 18
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-1.3 pp-2.7 pp9th most demanding of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital+80.5 pp+5.2 pphighest of 20
EV / EBITDA13.0×11.4×5th most expensive of 13
Net debt / EBITDA-1.9×1.4×2nd least indebted of 13

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Wartsila Oyj Abp WRT1V.HEFinland$17.1B-25%-2%13%23.5×7.2%+8.5%
Kubota 6326.TJapan$18.2B0%+13%11%10.0×7.5%+10.3%
Metso METSO.HEFinland$15.8B+14%+8%15%23.6×15.3%+9.6%
Hd Hyundai Heavy Industries 329180.KSSouth Korea$20.3B-62%+41%15%9.5×-7.0%+16.2%
CNH Industrial CNHUnited States$14.3B+5%+1%13%21.1×7.4%-7.0%
Doosan Enerbility 034020.KSSouth Korea$21.1B-65%+9%5%82.3×22.7%+13.2%
Yangzijiang Shipbuilding (Holdings) BS6.SISingapore$13.5B+11%+26%32%8.2×-10.1%+11.8%
XCMG Construction Machinery 000425.SZChina$12.6B-28%+8%8%11.0×-3.2%+6.4%
Hdksoe 009540.KSSouth Korea$12.5B-48%+23%23%4.4×n/an/a
Sinotruk Hong Kong 3808.HKHong Kong$12.3B-12%+38%7%9.4×-3.2%+1.5%
Sany Heavy Industry 6031.HKHong Kong$24.2B-27%+25%11%12.9×-1.1%-2.9%
CRRC 1766.HKHong Kong$26.4B+4%+7%6%9.2×-2.4%+3.1%
Ashok Leyland ASHOKLEY.NSIndia$10.7B+1%+16%17%24.8×n/an/a
Hanwha Ocean 042660.KSSouth Korea$10.7B-64%+18%13%8.7×-12.4%+13.2%
Epiroc EPI-A.STSweden$28.6B-10%+1%19%29.3×16.5%+11.4%
SamsungHvyInd 010140.KSSouth Korea$10.2B-50%+30%27%13.3×-20.3%+11.4%
Toro TTCUnited States$9.92B+10%+5%11%21.2×5.6%+6.0%
Komatsu 6301.TJapan$32.2B-12%+9%13%13.1×9.5%+13.6%
Weir WEIR.LUnited Kingdom$8.18B-3%+6%18%18.1×19.3%+5.5%
Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders MAZDOCK.NSIndia$7.87B-31%+8%15%30.5×n/an/a
AGCO AGCOUnited States$7.61B-6%+1%6%17.1×10.5%+2.0%

Questions

Who are Wartsila Oyj Abp's main competitors?
Named competitors: MAN Energy Solutions (private or unlisted), Rolls-Royce (RR..L), Caterpillar (MaK) (CAT), Siemens Energy (ENR.DE). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Kubota (6326.T), Metso (METSO.HE), Hd Hyundai Heavy Industries (329180.KS), CNH Industrial (CNH), Doosan Enerbility (034020.KS), Yangzijiang Shipbuilding (Holdings) (BS6.SI).
Is Wartsila Oyj Abp expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 23.5× against a peer median of 13.2×, 6th most expensive of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is -1 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Wartsila Oyj Abp stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -24.9% against -10.8% for the median peer; over one year -6.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.