Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › VTOL Bristow Group IncOpen in the cockpit ↗

Bristow Group IncVTOLCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Energy›Airlines

Provides helicopter transport services mainly for offshore oil & gas platforms, plus government search-and-rescue contracts.

Momentum weak 28
Mkt cap
$1.11B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
97%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$10.4M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
8.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-2.3 pp
WACC 8.4%
Hurdle
-38 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
117 days
3 Mar 2027
Close · USD$37.41
1D+2.0%
1W-10.9%
1M-8.0%
3M-19.6%
6M-11.7%
YTD+2.2%
1Y-3.5%
ATR %4.6%
Beta0.56
52w lowhigh25.7% off high

What Bristow does

Provides helicopter transport services mainly for offshore oil & gas platforms, plus government search-and-rescue contracts.

Contracts usually combine a fixed monthly charge for each helicopter kept available with a rate for hours flown, so the fixed element steadies revenue beyond flight demand alone. The 2020 merger with Era Group formed today's company, joining a Gulf of Mexico-focused business with Bristow's global one.

Products and services

  • Offshore oil & gas crew transport
  • Search-and-rescue (SAR) services
  • Government/defense helicopter services

Customers

  • Offshore oil & gas operators
  • Government agencies (SAR contracts)

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Energy services
  • Helicopter transport services
  • Offshore oil & gas crew transport + SAR

What could go right

  • Offshore oil & gas activity recovery
  • Government SAR contract wins

What could go wrong

  • Oil & gas capex cyclicality
  • Helicopter fleet maintenance/safety costs

Moat: narrow (scale, customer qualification, installed base). Large helicopter fleet and long-standing offshore safety-certification relationships are costly to replicate.

Headquarters: Houston, Texas, US · Founded: 1955 · Employees: 3,660

Named competitors

Bristow at a glance

Size Bristow (VTOL) is a United States Energy company (Airlines) with a market value of $1.11B, the 2187th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $37.41 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 11.7%, against -14.2% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 9th highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 10.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +17.8%); the operating margin is 8.7% (peer median 20.8%).

Valuation It trades at 8.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 11.0× (9th cheapest of 18).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +46%, so the hurdle is -38 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.3 points below its cost of capital (8.4% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 4.7% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 3 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026VTOL 88Peer median 83
Six months, rebased to 100: Bristow against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Bristow financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$1.62B$1.49B$1.42B$1.30B$1.23B
Revenue growth—+5%+9%+5%—
Gross profit$322M$318M$305M$236M$211M
EBITDA$253M$226M$213M$140M$127M
Net income$80.4M$129M$94.8M-$6.78M$18.0M
Free cash flow$12.0M$56.1M-$82.5M-$52.2M-$63.7M
Capital expenditure$159M$142M$255M$81.5M$49.6M
Total debt$976M$913M$957M$838M$754M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Bristow competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%+50%-30%-20%-10%TKNBRRESNVGSTBNBORRKOSTENREPXHPKFTKNATMNRINRGLPFETVTOL6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Bristow is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%10×20×NBRRESHOSNVGSKOSTENREPXHPKDECFLNGFTKNATXPROMNRINRGLPFETVTOLRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Bristow is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+50%+100%+150%0%50%100%150%NBRRESHOSKOSREPXDECMNRVTOLGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Bristow is the large dot.

Bristow competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (VTOL vs 002641.SZ vs BAB.L)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Bristow VTOL$1.11B-12%+10%9%8.9×7.5%
ERA 002641.SZ$690M-11%-2%0%42.0×-1.8%
Babcock International BAB.L$6.60B0%+7%6%15.4×13.2%

How Bristow compares with its peers

Peer set: Sector in the same market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Bristow against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureVTOLPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-8.0%-17.0%4th highest of 21
6-month return-11.7%-14.2%9th highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-25.7%-33.7%9th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+10.2%+17.8%8th lowest of 20
Operating margin8.7%20.8%7th lowest of 20
Forward P/E8.9×11.0×9th cheapest of 18
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)7.5%-1.1%3rd most demanding of 14
Growth delivered (Del g)+45.8%+12.0%2nd highest of 14
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-38.4 pp-13.1 pp2nd least demanding of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital-2.3 pp+1.3 pp5th lowest of 21
EV / EBITDA7.3×5.4×6th most expensive of 18
Net debt / EBITDA2.9×1.8×6th most indebted of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Sector in the same market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Bristow VTOLUnited States$1.11B-12%+10%9%8.9×7.5%+45.8%
Teekay TKUnited States$1.11B-10%+16%48%n/an/an/a
Nabors Industries NBRUnited States$1.11B-25%+5%8%19.1×4.0%+8.3%
RPC RESUnited States$1.18B-22%+18%3%17.9×12.2%+22.1%
Hornbeck Offshore Services HOSUnited States$1.18Bn/a+2%8%8.6×-1.1%+12.0%
Navigator NVGSUnited States$1.21B-14%+7%25%11.0×-2.2%+12.0%
Tamboran Resources TBNUnited States$1.01B-19%n/an/an/an/an/a
Borr Drilling BORRUnited States$1,000M-45%+3%21%n/an/an/a
Kosmos Energy KOSUnited States$1.26B-23%+23%23%4.6×-6.4%+9.9%
Tsakos Energy Navigation TENUnited States$1.32B+2%+23%38%3.5×n/an/a
Riley Exploration Permian REPXUnited States$913M+24%+23%39%4.2×-7.1%+164.3%
HighPeak Energy HPKUnited States$903M+23%-13%16%24.6×n/an/a
Diversified Energy DECUnited States$899M-19%+109%15%2.1×-0.5%+32.3%
FLEX LNG FLNGUnited States$1.38B-20%+1%49%11.5×-0.5%+16.1%
Flotek Industries FTKUnited States$886M+45%+59%13%21.9×n/an/a
Nordic American Tankers NATUnited States$1.41B+13%+29%29%7.7×-3.4%-3.8%
Expro XPROUnited States$1.47B-14%-5%4%18.0×13.9%+18.9%
Mach Natural Resources LP MNRUnited States$1.50B-35%+39%22%5.9×-10.0%+2.9%
Infinity Natural Resources INRUnited States$811M-17%+75%44%4.5×n/an/a
Global Partners LP GLPUnited States$1.53B-8%+20%2%11.3×-7.7%+17.4%
Forum Energy Technologies FETUnited States$800M+30%+11%7%12.9×3.5%+9.1%

Questions

Who are Bristow's main competitors?
Named competitors: Era Group (002641.SZ), Babcock International (BAB.L). The cockpit's measured peer set (sector in the same market, nearest in size) also includes Teekay (TK), Nabors Industries (NBR), RPC (RES), Hornbeck Offshore Services (HOS), Navigator (NVGS), Tamboran Resources (TBN).
Is Bristow expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 8.9× against a peer median of 11.0×, 9th cheapest of 18 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 7% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +46%, so the hurdle is -38 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Bristow stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -11.7% against -14.2% for the median peer; over one year -3.5%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.