Loading…

Vidrala SAVID.MCCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Spain · EUR·Materials›Containers/Packaging

Spanish manufacturer of glass bottles and containers for beverage, food and pharma packaging across Europe.

≈ A smaller, Iberian-focused Owens-IllinoisMomentum leader 80
Mkt cap
$3.63B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
62%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$2.27M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
14.6×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+3.6 pp
WACC 9.2%
Hurdle
-2 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
117 days
3 Mar 2027
Close · EUR€89.40
1D-2.7%
1W+3.4%
1M+1.7%
3M+2.2%
6M+18.1%
YTD-0.8%
1Y+7.6%
ATR %2.7%
52w lowhigh3.7% off high

What Vidrala does

Spanish manufacturer of glass bottles and containers for beverage, food and pharma packaging across Europe.

Sells glass bottles and jars to bottlers and food makers from furnaces that run continuously, so plant utilisation and energy costs decide profit. The 2017 purchase of Encirc added a UK and Irish business that bottles customers' drinks at the glass plant itself.

In one line: A smaller, Iberian-focused Owens-Illinois.

Products and services

  • Glass bottles for wine/spirits
  • Beer bottles
  • Food jars
  • Pharma glass containers

Customers

  • Wineries
  • Brewers
  • Food/beverage brands

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Materials
  • Rigid packaging
  • Glass container manufacturing

What could go right

  • Premium wine/spirits packaging demand
  • Southern/Eastern Europe expansion

What could go wrong

  • Energy cost exposure (gas-fired furnaces)
  • Substitution by cans/PET

Moat: narrow (scale, cost advantage, customer qualification). Furnace scale and long customer contracts, but glass competes with cans/PET on cost.

Headquarters: Llodio, Spain · Founded: 1965 · Employees: 4,822

Named competitors

Vidrala at a glance

Size Vidrala (VID.MC) is a Spain Materials company (Containers/Packaging) with a market value of $3.63B, the 34th largest of 97 Spain companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at €89.40 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 18.1%, against -0.4% for the median peer and +8.2% for the Spain market (cap-weighted) — 4th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 2.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +3.4%); the operating margin is 20.8% (peer median 8.2%).

Valuation It trades at 14.6× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.5× (8th cheapest of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is -2 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.6 points above its cost of capital (9.2% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 3 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10011012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026VID.MC 119Peer median 100
Six months, rebased to 100: Vidrala against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Vidrala financials

Reported figures in EUR; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue€1.47B€1.47B€1.59B€1.43B€1.35B
Revenue growth—-8%+11%+6%—
Gross profit€466M€448M€514M€456M€352M
EBITDA€446M€436M€438M€350M€252M
Net income€219M€209M€248M€233M€154M
Free cash flow€110M€202M€202M€120M-€3.17M
Capital expenditure€187M€189M€169M€152M€120M
Total debtn/a€262M€392M€598M€323M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Vidrala competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-10%0%+10%5901GEFGPKHUH1V3861SLGNVISAMBPMNDI2689VRLA00283130080620391626WPKSIGN002812VID.MC6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Vidrala is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%0×50×100×150×5901GEFGPK3861AMBPMNDI2689300806600529002812VID.MCRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Vidrala is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%0%20%5901GEFGPKHUH1V3861SLGNAMBPMNDISONVRLA0028312039WPKSIGN002812VID.MCGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Vidrala is the large dot.

Vidrala competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (VID.MC vs VRLA.PA vs OI vs VETN.SW)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Vidrala VID.MC$3.63B+18%-3%21%14.6×5.8%
Verallia SAS VRLA.PA$2.56B-10%-3%9%14.7×5.6%
O-I Glass OI$796M-44%-2%9%10.1×n/a
Vetropack VETN.SW$470M-3%-5%4%23.9×0.4%

How Vidrala compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Vidrala against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureVID.MCPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+1.7%+3.1%8th lowest of 21
6-month return+18.1%-0.4%4th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-3.7%-18.0%highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-2.6%+3.4%4th lowest of 21
Operating margin20.8%8.2%highest of 21
Forward P/E14.6×16.5×8th cheapest of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)5.8%-0.4%6th most demanding of 18
Growth delivered (Del g)+8.2%+6.5%5th highest of 18
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-2.4 pp-7.9 pp7th most demanding of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital+3.6 pp+1.1 pp6th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA7.9×8.3×7th cheapest of 15
Net debt / EBITDA0.7×3.2×2nd least indebted of 16

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Vidrala VID.MCSpain$3.63B+18%-3%21%14.6×5.8%+8.2%
Toyo Seikan 5901.TJapan$3.69B+34%+6%6%20.4×-2.7%+5.2%
Greif GEFUnited States$3.95B+7%-2%8%16.1×7.9%-4.7%
Graphic Packaging GPKUnited States$3.31B+5%0%6%12.3×5.0%+5.6%
Huhtamaki HUH1V.HEFinland$3.12B-1%-2%9%11.0×-6.3%+3.7%
Oji 3861.TJapan$4.31B-3%0%2%20.6×20.4%+6.5%
Silgan SLGNUnited States$4.34B+2%+4%10%10.2×-5.8%+5.7%
Viscofan VIS.MCSpain$2.86B-5%+3%15%16.6×-3.4%+6.5%
Ardagh Metal Packaging AMBPUnited States$2.82B+18%+17%5%17.0×4.1%+9.8%
Mondi MNDI.LUnited Kingdom$4.69B+5%+5%4%36.1×15.4%+2.1%
Nine Dragons Paper 2689.HKHong Kong$2.76B-29%+22%9%4.4×n/an/a
Sonoco Products SONUnited States$4.99B-2%+4%10%9.0×-1.9%+7.5%
Verallia SAS VRLA.PAFrance$2.56B-10%-3%9%14.7×5.6%+5.6%
Shenzhen YUTO Packaging Technology 002831.SZChina$5.19B0%+1%11%20.8×-0.4%+7.9%
Jiangsu Sidike New Materials Science & Technology 300806.SZChina$5.33B-17%+12%4%154.7×n/an/a
China International Marine Containers (Group) 2039.HKHong Kong$6.11B-35%+6%4%12.7×-8.1%+9.9%
Jia Yao 1626.HKHong Kong$2.05B+175%+161%6%n/an/an/a
Winpak WPK.TOCanada$1.91B+12%+3%15%12.5×-10.9%+6.6%
SIG SIGN.SWSwitzerland$7.07B+23%-5%5%20.5×18.4%+9.4%
Shandong Pharmaceutical Glass 600529.SSChina$1.85B0%-9%18%16.5×-2.4%+5.5%
Yunnan Energy New Material (Group) 002812.SZChina$7.55B-38%+50%17%19.8×7.8%+26.1%

Questions

Who are Vidrala's main competitors?
Named competitors: Verallia (VRLA.PA), O-I Glass (OI), Ardagh Group (private or unlisted), Vetropack (VETN.SW). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Toyo Seikan (5901.T), Greif (GEF), Graphic Packaging (GPK), Huhtamaki (HUH1V.HE), Oji (3861.T), Silgan (SLGN).
Is Vidrala expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 14.6× against a peer median of 16.5×, 8th cheapest of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is -2 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Vidrala stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +18.1% against -0.4% for the median peer; over one year +7.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.