Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › TRN Trinity Industries, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

Trinity Industries, Inc.TRNCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Industrials›Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery

Builds and leases North American freight railcars through its TrinityRail platform.

Momentum neutral 54
Mkt cap
$2.30B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
99%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$26.4M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
15.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-3.7 pp
WACC 7.3%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
111 days
25 Feb 2027
Close · USD$29.43
1D-3.5%
1W-0.1%
1M+15.9%
3M+2.0%
6M-19.7%
YTD+11.3%
1Y+12.1%
ATR %3.9%
Beta0.52
52w lowhigh23.2% off high

What Trinity Industries does

Builds and leases North American freight railcars through its TrinityRail platform.

Leasing is the steadier earner: it rents railcars to shippers and railroads on multi-year contracts and sells older cars from its fleet. Manufacturing builds new cars both for its own lease fleet and for other buyers, so the factory runs with railcar orders. Some leased cars are sold to investors and then leased back.

Products and services

  • Railcar manufacturing
  • Railcar leasing (TrinityRail)
  • Maintenance & fleet services

Customers

  • Class I railroads
  • Chemical/energy shippers
  • Railcar lessors/investors

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Rail transportation equipment
  • Railcar manufacturing
  • Railcar leasing & fleet management

What could go right

  • Railcar replacement cycle
  • Leasing fleet utilization/lease rates

What could go wrong

  • Railcar order cyclicality
  • Interest-rate sensitivity of leasing fleet

Moat: narrow (scale, installed base). Large leasing fleet and manufacturing scale help, but Greenbrier competes head-to-head for the same customers.

Headquarters: Dallas, Texas · Founded: 1933 · Employees: 6,110

Named competitors

  • Greenbrier Companies GBX
  • FreightCar America private or unlisted
  • Union Tank Car (Marmon/Berkshire) private or unlisted
  • National Steel Car private or unlisted
  • GATX GATX

Trinity Industries at a glance

Size Trinity Industries (TRN) is a United States Industrials company (Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) with a market value of $2.30B, the 1710th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $29.43 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 19.7%, against -10.8% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 7th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 2.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +13.4%); the operating margin is 13.4% (peer median 6.5%).

Valuation It trades at 15.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 10.8× (6th most expensive of 19).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.7 points below its cost of capital (7.3% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 5.9% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 25 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 88TRN 81
Six months, rebased to 100: Trinity Industries against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Trinity Industries financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$2.12B$2.16B$3.08B$2.98B$1.98B
Revenue growth—-30%+3%+51%—
Gross profit$511M$576M$667M$520M$366M
EBITDA$578M$666M$725M$611M$457M
Net income$327M$253M$138M$106M$65.8M
Free cash flow-$272M-$435M-$21.9M-$414M-$980M
Capital expenditure$682M$795M$596M$710M$967M
Total debt$5.33B$5.55B$5.80B$5.87B$5.72B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Trinity Industries competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%-20%0%0027796005286432CADLR600710301039NFI000680000528GRSE700360103868848526727006313105CRAFTSMANCAFTRN6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Trinity Industries is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%0×50×100×150×0027796432CADLR600710301039GRSE267270CRAFTSMANTRNRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Trinity Industries is the large dot.

Trinity Industries competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (TRN vs GBX vs GATX)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Trinity Industries TRN$2.30B-20%-2%13%15.8×n/a
Greenbrier Companies GBX$1.29B-18%-24%4%13.0×n/a
GATX GATX$6.38B-2%+30%30%17.0×n/a

How Trinity Industries compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Trinity Industries against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureTRNPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+15.9%+1.3%highest of 21
6-month return-19.7%-10.8%7th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-23.2%-33.1%7th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-2.4%+13.4%2nd lowest of 21
Operating margin13.4%6.5%3rd highest of 21
Forward P/E15.8×10.8×6th most expensive of 19
ROIC minus cost of capital-3.7 pp+1.0 pp5th lowest of 20
EV / EBITDA12.7×7.4×3rd most expensive of 10
Net debt / EBITDA8.7×0.8×most indebted of 11

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Trinity Industries TRNUnited States$2.30B-20%-2%13%15.8×n/an/a
ZHEJIANG ZHONGJIAN TECHNOLOGY 002779.SZChina$2.26B+2%+28%-17%150.7×n/an/a
China Railway Hi-tech Industry 600528.SSChina$2.37B-9%-8%5%n/a-4.0%+2.6%
Takeuchi Mfg.Co 6432.TJapan$2.21B+4%+12%16%10.6×4.0%+14.9%
Cadeler A/S CADLR.OLNorway$2.41B-14%+53%36%9.4×n/an/a
Sumec 600710.SSChina$2.18B-9%+14%4%9.8×-17.2%+3.6%
CIMC Vehicles (Group) 301039.SZChina$2.07B-18%+6%4%16.6×-4.3%-5.2%
NFI NFI.TOCanada$2.06B+13%+15%2%11.0×12.0%+9.3%
Anhui Heli 600761.SSChina$2.06B-14%+13%7%10.9×-6.7%+9.2%
Shantui Construction Machinery 000680.SZChina$2.06B-22%+14%10%9.8×-4.4%+15.6%
Guangxi Liugong Machinery 000528.SZChina$2.58B-13%+10%6%10.5×-3.5%+5.0%
Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers GRSE.NSIndia$2.60B-31%+40%10%26.5×n/an/a
Mitsui ES 7003.TJapan$1.98B-45%+12%11%8.7×16.0%-11.3%
First Tractor 601038.SSChina$1.95B+2%+12%6%17.5×-1.6%+7.5%
Beijing Jiuzhouyigui Environmental Technology 688485.SSChina$1.91B+29%+9%2%n/an/an/a
Hd Ce 267270.KSSouth Korea$2.80B-56%+115%8%8.6×-9.6%+9.6%
Sany Heavy Equipment International 0631.HKHong Kong$2.82B-46%+19%6%8.9×1.4%+26.1%
Nisshinbo 3105.TJapan$1.87B-9%+2%7%11.5×3.6%+1.9%
Craftsman Automation CRAFTSMAN.NSIndia$2.90B+21%+36%10%44.5×n/an/a
Construcciones y Auxiliar de Ferrocarriles CAF.MCSpain$2.92B+21%+12%6%13.5×1.0%+10.2%
Modec 6269.TJapan$3.03B-46%+17%9%7.7×-21.3%+18.6%

Questions

Who are Trinity Industries's main competitors?
Named competitors: Greenbrier Companies (GBX), FreightCar America (private or unlisted), Union Tank Car (Marmon/Berkshire) (private or unlisted), National Steel Car (private or unlisted), GATX (GATX). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes ZHEJIANG ZHONGJIAN TECHNOLOGY (002779.SZ), China Railway Hi-tech Industry (600528.SS), Takeuchi Mfg.Co (6432.T), Cadeler A/S (CADLR.OL), Sumec (600710.SS), CIMC Vehicles (Group) (301039.SZ).
Is Trinity Industries expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 15.8× against a peer median of 10.8×, 6th most expensive of 19 in its peer set.
How has Trinity Industries stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -19.7% against -10.8% for the median peer; over one year +12.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.