Loading…

TridentTRIDENT.NSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

India · INR·Chemicals›Textiles

Punjab-based manufacturer of home textiles (towels, bed linen) and wheat-straw-based paper products.

≈ A vertically integrated Indian home-textile and paper makerMomentum neutral 53
Mkt cap
$1.29B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
24%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$4.64M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
17.1×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-2.2 pp
WACC 11.8%
Hurdle
+11 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
100 days
14 Feb 2027
Close · INR₹23.88
1D+0.1%
1W+12.8%
1M+7.0%
3M-4.1%
6M-11.0%
YTD-10.7%
1Y-17.1%
ATR %3.3%
Beta1.14
52w lowhigh22.8% off high

What Trident does

Punjab-based manufacturer of home textiles (towels, bed linen) and wheat-straw-based paper products.

Spins its own cotton yarn and weaves it into terry towels and bed linen, mostly for export, so it earns in dollars while costs are largely in rupees. Wheat-straw paper is the smaller second business. Founded and still controlled by the family of chairman Rajinder Gupta.

In one line: A vertically integrated Indian home-textile and paper maker.

Products and services

  • Terry towels
  • Bed linen
  • Paper products
  • Cotton yarn

Customers

  • Global retailers (towels/linen)
  • Paper/packaging buyers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Cotton/wheat straw sourcing
  • Yarn/terry towel & paper manufacturing
  • Export/domestic distribution

What could go right

  • Global home-textile export demand growth

What could go wrong

  • Cotton price volatility
  • Global textile demand cyclicality

Moat: narrow (scale). Large integrated scale in terry towels gives cost advantages versus smaller regional mills.

Headquarters: Ludhiana, India · Founded: 1990 · Employees: 16,303

Named competitors

Trident at a glance

Size Trident (TRIDENT.NS) is an India Materials company (Textiles) with a market value of $1.29B, the 520th largest of 1,058 India companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ₹23.88 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 11.0%, against +21.0% for the median peer and 0.0% for the India market (cap-weighted) — 6th lowest of 14 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 4.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +1.8%); the operating margin is 10.8% (peer median 6.3%).

Valuation It trades at 17.1× forward earnings against a peer median of 18.9× (6th cheapest of 11).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 19% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is +11 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.2 points below its cost of capital (11.8% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 14 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 118TRIDENT.NS 90
Six months, rebased to 100: Trident against the median of its 14 peers (local-currency closes).

Trident financials

Reported figures in INR; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue₹67.1B₹63.0B₹65.9B₹64.4B₹59.8B
Revenue growth—-4%+2%+8%—
Gross profit₹22.2B₹7.36B₹7.39B₹7.52B₹7.18B
EBITDA₹10.1B₹5.42B₹5.90B₹5.79B₹6.19B
Net income₹4.80B₹3.77B₹3.70B₹3.50B₹4.41B
Free cash flown/a₹3.93B₹6.46B-₹4.93B₹5.68B
Capital expendituren/a₹3.16B₹2.30B₹6.47B₹7.79B
Total debt₹14.3B₹18.3B₹16.4B₹21.3B₹14.4B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Trident competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%-20%0%ABRELARVINDVTLICIL120110RAYMONDSANATHANALOKINDSFILATEXGHCLJINDWORLDNITINSPINMAYURUNIQTRIDENT.NS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Trident is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%+60%+80%0×25×50×75×ARVINDVTLICIL120110RAYMONDSANATHANGHCLMAYURUNIQTRIDENT.NSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Trident is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%0%20%40%ABRELARVINDICIL120110FILATEXGHCLJINDWORLDNITINSPINTRIDENT.NSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Trident is the large dot.

Trident competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (TRIDENT.NS vs WELSPUNLIV.NS vs VTL.NS vs ICIL.NS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Trident TRIDENT.NS$1.29B-11%-4%11%17.1×18.5%
Welspun Living WELSPUNLIV.NS$2.41B+82%+5%8%35.5×32.4%
Vardhman Textiles VTL.NS$1.56B-15%+3%9%12.0×n/a
Indo Count Industries ICIL.NS$1.03B+68%+19%8%29.7×31.4%

How Trident compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Trident against its 14 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureTRIDENT.NSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+7.0%-3.7%highest of 15
6-month return-11.0%+21.0%6th lowest of 14
Distance from 52-week high-22.8%-20.0%7th lowest of 15
Revenue growth (TTM)-4.4%+1.8%3rd lowest of 14
Operating margin10.8%6.3%3rd highest of 14
Forward P/E17.1×18.9×6th cheapest of 11
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)18.5%20.8%5th least demanding of 10
Growth delivered (Del g)+7.9%+10.5%5th lowest of 10
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+10.6 pp+7.5 pp4th most demanding of 10
ROIC minus cost of capital-2.2 pp-3.1 pp6th highest of 14
EV / EBITDA12.9×12.9×6th cheapest of 12
Net debt / EBITDA0.8×1.5×5th least indebted of 13

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Trident TRIDENT.NSIndia$1.29B-11%-4%11%17.1×18.5%+7.9%
Aditya Birla Real Estate ABREL.NSIndia$1.26B-33%-26%-19%n/a39.6%-30.9%
Arvind ARVIND.NSIndia$1.43B+10%+19%8%26.6×21.1%+12.8%
Vardhman Textiles VTL.NSIndia$1.56B-15%+3%9%12.0×n/an/a
Indo Count Industries ICIL.NSIndia$1.03B+68%+19%8%29.7×31.4%+10.5%
Kolon Ind 120110.KSSouth Korea$858M-61%+2%4%4.9×4.2%+4.2%
Raymond RAYMOND.NSIndia$761M+111%-6%6%79.4×n/an/a
Kusumgar KUSUMGAR.NSIndia$612Mn/an/an/a34.7×n/an/a
Sanathan Textiles SANATHAN.NSIndia$500M+21%+77%5%23.2×n/an/a
Alok Industries ALOKINDS.NSIndia$442M-41%+6%-4%n/an/an/a
Filatex India FILATEX.NSIndia$427M+100%0%6%n/a20.8%+13.3%
GHCL GHCL.NSIndia$406M-21%+2%20%7.7×-2.5%+4.2%
Jindal Worldwide JINDWORLD.NSIndia$399M+39%-2%5%n/a21.9%+6.0%
Nitin Spinners NITINSPIN.NSIndia$390M+33%0%11%12.8×6.8%+14.7%
Mayur Uniquoters MAYURUNIQ.NSIndia$344M+23%+16%22%14.7×14.8%+13.6%

Questions

Who are Trident's main competitors?
Named competitors: Welspun Living (WELSPUNLIV.NS), Vardhman Textiles (VTL.NS), Indo Count Industries (ICIL.NS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Aditya Birla Real Estate (ABREL.NS), Arvind (ARVIND.NS), Vardhman Textiles (VTL.NS), Indo Count Industries (ICIL.NS), Kolon Ind (120110.KS), Raymond (RAYMOND.NS).
Is Trident expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 17.1× against a peer median of 18.9×, 6th cheapest of 11 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 19% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is +11 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Trident stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -11.0% against +21.0% for the median peer; over one year -17.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.