Loading…

Snam S.p.A.SRG.MICompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Italy · EUR·Utilities›Gas Distributors

Italy's main natural gas transmission and storage network operator, and an investor in hydrogen infrastructure.

Momentum strong 74
Mkt cap
$23.3B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
61%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$41.6M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
14.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-1.2 pp
WACC 5.9%
Hurdle
+2 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
132 days
18 Mar 2027
Close · EUR€6.20
1D-1.2%
1W+0.7%
1M+10.7%
3M+7.5%
6M-2.2%
YTD+9.6%
1Y+10.7%
ATR %1.6%
52w lowhigh9.8% off high

What Snam does

Italy's main natural gas transmission and storage network operator, and an investor in hydrogen infrastructure.

Earns a regulated return on the value of its pipelines and storage sites, set by Italy's energy regulator ARERA, so growth in the regulated asset base (the value of network assets on which the return is calculated), not gas prices, drives revenue. Cassa Depositi e Prestiti, the state lender, is the largest shareholder through its investment vehicles.

Products and services

  • Gas transmission pipelines
  • Gas storage
  • LNG regasification terminals
  • Hydrogen infrastructure development

Customers

  • Gas shippers, utilities, industrial gas users

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Utilities
  • Gas infrastructure
  • Gas transmission, storage…

What could go right

  • Regulated asset base growth (RAB)
  • Energy security-driven gas infrastructure investment

What could go wrong

  • Regulatory tariff-setting risk
  • Long-term gas demand decline from decarbonization

Moat: wide (regulatory licence, scale, installed base). Regulated monopoly operator of Italy's national gas transmission grid.

Headquarters: San Donato Milanese, Italy · Founded: 2001 · Employees: 4,008

Named competitors

Snam at a glance

Size Snam (SRG.MI) is an Italy Utilities company (Gas Distributors) with a market value of $23.3B, the 15th largest of 123 Italy companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at €6.20 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 2.2%, against +1.3% for the median peer and +3.1% for the Italy market (cap-weighted) — 9th lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 8.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +2.5%); the operating margin is 46.1% (peer median 20.7%).

Valuation It trades at 14.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.2× (9th cheapest of 20).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +7%, so the hurdle is +2 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.2 points below its cost of capital (5.9% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 18 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

909510010511 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 102SRG.MI 100
Six months, rebased to 100: Snam against the median of its 19 peers (local-currency closes).

Snam financials

Reported figures in EUR; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue€3.96B€3.85B€3.55B€4.24B€3.50B
Revenue growth—+9%-16%+21%—
Gross profit€2.49B€2.51B€2.54B€2.22B€1.87B
EBITDA€3.02B€2.93B€2.69B€2.36B€2.22B
Net income€1.15B€1.27B€1.26B€1.14B€671M
Free cash flow€1.12B€259M-€724M-€1.68B€2.97B
Capital expenditure€2.56B€2.71B€2.81B€1.80B€1.32B
Total debtn/a€20.5B€19.4B€16.7B€13.7B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Snam competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%-10%0%+10%-10%0%+10%NICQPATO0003NTGY95329531ALASREIGAPACU600803CNA0135DCC2688SWXBKHSRG.MI6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Snam is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-60%-40%-20%0%+20%20×40×NICQPATO0003NTGY9532ALAIGAPACU6008030135DCC2688SWXSRG.MIRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Snam is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%-10%0%10%20%CQP0003NTGY95329531IGAPACU6008030135DCC2688SRG.MIGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Snam is the large dot.

Snam competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (SRG.MI vs IG.MI vs TRN.MI vs ENG.MC)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Snam SRG.MI$23.3B-2%+9%46%14.5×9.3%
Italgas IG.MI$10.4B-12%+9%49%12.3×2.4%
Terna TRN.MI$22.0B-2%+11%42%17.8×n/a
Enagas ENG.MC$5.22B+7%-2%21%19.4×15.0%

How Snam compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Snam against its 19 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureSRG.MIPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+10.7%+3.1%3rd highest of 20
6-month return-2.2%+1.3%9th lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-9.8%-10.3%10th highest of 20
Revenue growth (TTM)+8.6%+2.5%4th highest of 20
Operating margin46.1%20.7%2nd highest of 19
Forward P/E14.5×15.2×9th cheapest of 20
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)9.3%0.3%3rd most demanding of 13
Growth delivered (Del g)+6.9%+8.3%6th lowest of 13
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+2.3 pp-10.3 pp5th most demanding of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital-1.2 pp-0.3 pp6th lowest of 19
EV / EBITDA13.5×11.0×6th most expensive of 17
Net debt / EBITDA6.6×4.3×most indebted of 17

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Snam SRG.MIItaly$23.3B-2%+9%46%14.5×9.3%+6.9%
NiSource NIUnited States$21.2B-6%+10%27%20.3×n/an/a
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P CQPUnited States$27.8B-8%+13%33%12.0×-13.4%+12.7%
Atmos Energy ATOUnited States$29.3B-4%+6%37%19.3×n/an/a
HK & China Gas 0003.HKHong Kong$17.6B+3%+2%14%21.6×8.7%+5.8%
Naturgy Energy NTGY.MCSpain$31.8B+8%+5%18%13.1×-7.4%+4.9%
Osaka Gas 9532.TJapan$13.3B-2%+1%7%14.6×4.0%+8.3%
Tokyo Gas 9531.TJapan$13.1B-7%+4%7%16.3×-1.8%+9.9%
AltaGas ALA.TOCanada$11.8B+4%+18%9%22.5×n/an/a
Sempra SREUnited States$51.1B-14%+1%25%15.2×n/an/a
Italgas IG.MIItaly$10.4B-12%+9%49%12.3×2.4%+11.3%
APA APA.AXAustralia$10.4B+7%-6%38%49.3×12.5%+3.1%
Canadian Utilities CU.TOCanada$10.1B+9%+1%16%18.9×20.1%+2.7%
ENN Natural Gas 600803.SSChina$9.83B+5%-1%n/a11.8×-6.1%+8.4%
Centrica CNA.LUnited Kingdom$9.23B-25%0%23%13.1×n/an/a
KunLun Energy 0135.HKHong Kong$8.35B+1%+6%5%9.5×-13.0%+11.4%
DCC Energy DCC.LUnited Kingdom$7.41B+13%-14%3%12.7×7.1%+2.9%
Enn Energy 2688.HKHong Kong$7.02B-17%+6%7%7.6×-3.4%+8.6%
Southwest Gas SWXUnited States$6.62B+2%-57%29%18.9×n/an/a
Black Hills BKHUnited States$6.47B+13%+3%24%18.2×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Snam's main competitors?
Named competitors: Italgas (IG.MI), Terna (TRN.MI), Enagas (ENG.MC). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes NiSource (NI), Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P (CQP), Atmos Energy (ATO), HK & China Gas (0003.HK), Naturgy Energy (NTGY.MC), Osaka Gas (9532.T).
Is Snam expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 14.5× against a peer median of 15.2×, 9th cheapest of 20 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +7%, so the hurdle is +2 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Snam stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -2.2% against +1.3% for the median peer; over one year +10.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.