Loading…

Osaka Gas Co9532.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Utilities›Gas Distributors

Regional gas utility serving Osaka/Kansai, with LNG trading and US shale gas investments.

≈ A Japanese regional gas utility with a US energy investment armMomentum neutral 59
Mkt cap
$13.3B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
81%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$42.7M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
14.6×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-0.9 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-4 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
87 days
1 Feb 2027
Close · JPY¥5,572
1D-7.3%
1W-4.3%
1M-1.6%
3M+2.8%
6M-1.9%
YTD+3.6%
1Y+33.8%
ATR %2.8%
52w lowhigh17.6% off high

What Osaka Gas does

Regional gas utility serving Osaka/Kansai, with LNG trading and US shale gas investments.

Sells gas to households and businesses in the Kansai region at tariffs that pass fuel costs through with a delay, so profit depends on that lag. It also sells electricity and has built an overseas energy-investment business, including US shale gas and LNG export capacity at Freeport.

In one line: A Japanese regional gas utility with a US energy investment arm.

Products and services

  • City gas distribution
  • LNG procurement/trading
  • Electricity retail
  • Overseas energy investment (US shale)

Customers

  • Households and businesses in Kansai region

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Utilities
  • Gas distributors
  • Regional gas distribution + LNG/energy…

What could go right

  • LNG trading margins
  • Non-Japan energy investment income

What could go wrong

  • Gas demand decline (efficiency/electrification)
  • LNG price volatility

Moat: narrow (regulatory licence, installed base). Regulated regional gas pipeline network, but a liberalized retail energy market limits pricing power.

Headquarters: Osaka, Japan · Founded: 1897 · Employees: 21,835

Named competitors

Osaka Gas at a glance

Size Osaka Gas (9532.T) is a Japan Utilities company (Gas Distributors) with a market value of $13.3B, the 106th largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥5,572 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 1.9%, against +1.4% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 10th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 0.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.6%); the operating margin is 6.9% (peer median 23.2%).

Valuation It trades at 14.6× forward earnings against a peer median of 16.4× (10th cheapest of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is -4 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.9 points below its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 1 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9510010511011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 1029532.T 98
Six months, rebased to 100: Osaka Gas against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Osaka Gas financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥2.10T¥2.03T¥2.07T¥2.08T¥2.28T
Revenue growth—-2%-1%-8%—
Gross profit¥516B¥438B¥406B¥410B¥282B
EBITDAn/a¥317B¥295B¥305B¥188B
Net income¥124B¥153B¥134B¥133B¥57.1B
Free cash flown/a¥102B¥72.8B¥138B-¥139B
Capital expendituren/a¥260B¥230B¥194B¥201B
Total debt¥729B¥890B¥972B¥913B¥903B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Osaka Gas competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-10%0%+10%0%+5%+10%9531ALAIGAPACU0003600803CNANI0135SRGDCC2688SWXBKHCQPATONTGYNJRSR9532.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Osaka Gas is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%10×15×20×9531ALAIGAPACU0003600803CNANI0135SRGDCC2688SWXBKHCQPATONTGYNJRSR9532.TRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Osaka Gas is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%+20%-10%0%10%20%9531IGAPACU00036008030135SRGDCC2688CQPNTGY9532.TGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Osaka Gas is the large dot.

Osaka Gas competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (9532.T vs 9531.T vs 9533.T vs 9503.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Osaka Gas 9532.T$13.3B-2%+1%7%14.6×4.0%
Tokyo Gas 9531.T$13.1B-7%+4%7%16.3×-1.8%
TOHO GAS 9533.T$2.83B+3%-2%1%21.3×24.6%
Kansai Electric Power 9503.T$17.3B+2%+2%6%8.2×11.0%
Saibu Gas 9536.T$630M+23%-6%5%n/an/a
Shizuoka Gas 9543.T$631M-5%0%6%11.6×-9.0%

How Osaka Gas compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Osaka Gas against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure9532.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-1.6%+5.1%3rd lowest of 21
6-month return-1.9%+1.4%10th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-17.6%-9.6%6th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+0.9%+4.6%6th lowest of 21
Operating margin6.9%23.2%3rd lowest of 20
Forward P/E14.6×16.4×10th cheapest of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)4.0%0.3%6th most demanding of 13
Growth delivered (Del g)+8.3%+7.7%7th highest of 13
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-4.3 pp-10.3 pp6th most demanding of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital-0.9 pp+0.0 pp7th lowest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Osaka Gas 9532.TJapan$13.3B-2%+1%7%14.6×4.0%+8.3%
Tokyo Gas 9531.TJapan$13.1B-7%+4%7%16.3×-1.8%+9.9%
AltaGas ALA.TOCanada$11.8B+4%+18%9%22.5×n/an/a
Italgas IG.MIItaly$10.4B-12%+9%49%12.3×2.4%+11.3%
APA APA.AXAustralia$10.4B+7%-6%38%49.3×12.5%+3.1%
Canadian Utilities CU.TOCanada$10.1B+9%+1%16%18.9×20.1%+2.7%
HK & China Gas 0003.HKHong Kong$17.6B+3%+2%14%21.6×8.7%+5.8%
ENN Natural Gas 600803.SSChina$9.83B+5%-1%n/a11.8×-6.1%+8.4%
Centrica CNA.LUnited Kingdom$9.23B-25%0%23%13.1×n/an/a
NiSource NIUnited States$21.2B-6%+10%27%20.3×n/an/a
KunLun Energy 0135.HKHong Kong$8.35B+1%+6%5%9.5×-13.0%+11.4%
Snam SRG.MIItaly$23.3B-2%+9%46%14.5×9.3%+6.9%
DCC Energy DCC.LUnited Kingdom$7.41B+13%-14%3%12.7×7.1%+2.9%
Enn Energy 2688.HKHong Kong$7.02B-17%+6%7%7.6×-3.4%+8.6%
Southwest Gas SWXUnited States$6.62B+2%-57%29%18.9×n/an/a
Black Hills BKHUnited States$6.47B+13%+3%24%18.2×n/an/a
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P CQPUnited States$27.8B-8%+13%33%12.0×-13.4%+12.7%
Atmos Energy ATOUnited States$29.3B-4%+6%37%19.3×n/an/a
Naturgy Energy NTGY.MCSpain$31.8B+8%+5%18%13.1×-7.4%+4.9%
New Jersey Resources NJRUnited States$5.51B-2%+7%24%16.6×n/an/a
Spire SRUnited States$5.25B+4%+4%20%17.9×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Osaka Gas's main competitors?
Named competitors: Tokyo Gas (9531.T), Toho Gas (9533.T), Kansai Electric Power (9503.T), Saibu Gas Holdings (9536.T), Shizuoka Gas (9543.T). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Tokyo Gas (9531.T), AltaGas (ALA.TO), Italgas (IG.MI), APA (APA.AX), Canadian Utilities (CU.TO), HK & China Gas (0003.HK).
Is Osaka Gas expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 14.6× against a peer median of 16.4×, 10th cheapest of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +8%, so the hurdle is -4 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Osaka Gas stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -1.9% against +1.4% for the median peer; over one year +33.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.