Loading…

QXO, Inc.QXOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Industrials›Wholesale Distributors

Building-products distribution company (roofing, building materials) being assembled through acquisitions led by founder Brad Jacobs.

Momentum weak 20
Mkt cap
$12.0B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
93%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$217M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
29.2×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-13.3 pp
WACC 12.6%
Hurdle
-126 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
11 days
17 Nov 2026
Close · USD$11.56
1D-0.7%
1W+4.7%
1M+4.0%
3M-24.8%
6M-38.4%
YTD-40.1%
1Y-29.9%
ATR %6.1%
Beta2.59
52w lowhigh58.1% off high

What QXO does

Building-products distribution company (roofing, building materials) being assembled through acquisitions led by founder Brad Jacobs.

A vehicle that Brad Jacobs took over in 2024, when it was the small software company SilverSun Technologies, to roll up building-products distributors. Its main operating business is Beacon Roofing Supply, bought in 2025, which earns a distributor's margin selling roofing materials to contractors from a branch network.

Products and services

  • Roofing & building materials distribution
  • Acquired distribution businesses (Beacon Roofing)

Customers

  • Roofing/building contractors
  • Homebuilders

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Distribution
  • Building materials roll-up

What could go right

  • Roll-up M&A in fragmented building-products distribution
  • Cross-selling across acquired networks

What could go wrong

  • Construction/housing cyclicality
  • Integration execution risk from rapid M&A

Moat: narrow (scale, distribution). Aims to build scale through rapid consolidation of building-products distributors, echoing Jacobs' prior roll-up playbook (XPO, United Rentals).

Headquarters: Greenwich, Connecticut, USA · Founded: 2023 · Employees: 7,794

Named competitors

QXO at a glance

Size QXO (QXO) is a United States Industrials company (Wholesale Distributors) with a market value of $12.0B, the 694th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $11.56 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 38.4%, against -4.4% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 408.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.3%); the operating margin is -1.4% (peer median 9.8%).

Valuation It trades at 29.2× forward earnings against a peer median of 17.8× (5th most expensive of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 52% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +178%, so the hurdle is -126 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 13.3 points below its cost of capital (12.6% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 13.0% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 17 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 95QXO 63
Six months, rebased to 100: QXO against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

QXO financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$9.90B$6.84B$56.9M$54.5M$45.0M
Revenue growth—+11,931%+4%+21%—
Gross profit$1.70B$1.15B$21.9M$20.8M$17.0M
EBITDA$537M$366M-$69.9M$2.80M$1.37M
Net income-$512M-$279M$28.0M-$1.07M-$282,219
Free cash flow$141M$183M$84.8M$462,880$2.00M
Capital expenditure$112M$78.2M$102,000$120,927$38,742
Total debt$7.04B$3.91B$577,000$2.62M$2.40M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

QXO competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%-10%0%+10%BNZLRXLSGHBOLDPLMTIHAITWCC600415BNR2207CNMADDT-BFTTBEIJ-B002493REH3064601600IMCDQXO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. QXO is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+100%+200%+300%+400%20×30×BNZLRXLSGHBOLDPLMTIHAITWCCADDT-BBEIJ-B002493REH3064601600IMCDQXORevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. QXO is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+50%+100%+150%0%100%BNZLRXLSGHBOLDPLM002493601600QXOGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. QXO is the large dot.

QXO competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (QXO vs BLDR vs SITE vs FERG)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
QXO QXO$12.0B-38%+408%-1%29.2×52.0%
Builders FirstSource BLDR$6.73B-19%-8%2%23.9×25.6%
SiteOne Landscape Supply SITE$4.86B-7%+3%5%24.4×18.4%
Ferguson Enterprises FERG$45.2B-3%+8%10%19.4×9.9%

How QXO compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

QXO against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureQXOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+4.0%+3.3%9th highest of 21
6-month return-38.4%-4.4%lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-58.1%-17.5%lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+408.2%+4.3%highest of 21
Operating margin-1.4%9.8%2nd lowest of 21
Forward P/E29.2×17.8×5th most expensive of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)52.0%9.7%most demanding of 20
Growth delivered (Del g)+178.0%+11.3%highest of 20
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-126.0 pp-1.3 ppleast demanding of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital-13.3 pp+3.3 pplowest of 21
EV / EBITDA30.3×12.6×most expensive of 17
Net debt / EBITDA2.4×2.1×9th most indebted of 18

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
QXO QXOUnited States$12.0B-38%+408%-1%29.2×52.0%+178.0%
Bunzl BNZL.LUnited Kingdom$12.0B+22%+2%7%15.3×2.3%+3.2%
Rexel RXL.PAFrance$11.9B-10%+1%6%13.5×7.7%+9.0%
SGH SGH.AXAustralia$11.9B+7%-1%13%18.1×11.4%+17.0%
Bollore BOL.PAFrance$11.8B-28%-83%-7%36.9×37.0%-29.4%
Diploma DPLM.LUnited Kingdom$12.6B+4%+13%22%27.5×23.9%+23.1%
Toromont Industries TIH.TOCanada$10.7B-15%+16%15%20.2×7.6%+8.4%
Applied Industrial Technologies AITUnited States$10.3B-8%+8%11%23.0×8.6%+8.9%
WESCO International WCCUnited States$14.2B-18%+14%6%14.1×10.4%+13.8%
Zhejiang China Commodities City 600415.SSChina$10.0B-7%+22%22%14.4×n/an/a
Brenntag BNR.DEGermany$10.0B0%-5%5%14.5×1.9%+5.2%
Hotai Motor 2207.TWTaiwan$8.90B+10%+8%11%13.2×1.5%+3.9%
Core & Main CNMUnited States$8.76B-6%-1%10%14.3×5.3%+16.0%
Addtech ADDT-B.STSweden$8.66B-2%+4%13%30.7×19.3%+14.9%
Finning International FTT.TOCanada$8.20B-9%0%8%17.5×10.1%+11.3%
Beijer Ref BEIJ-B.STSweden$8.09B+27%+4%10%28.0×14.0%+21.4%
Rongsheng Petrochemical 002493.SZChina$17.9B-14%-11%8%12.2×-4.4%+22.1%
Reece REH.AXAustralia$7.83B+44%+4%6%35.5×24.2%+8.4%
MonotaRO 3064.TJapan$7.04B+22%+19%14%29.6×9.7%+16.2%
Aluminum Corporation of China 601600.SSChina$20.7B-26%+5%18%6.7×-16.2%+5.3%
Imcd IMCD.ASNetherlands$6.80B+7%+3%8%18.2×10.9%+11.5%

Questions

Who are QXO's main competitors?
Named competitors: Builders FirstSource (BLDR), SiteOne Landscape Supply (SITE), Ferguson Enterprises (FERG). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Bunzl (BNZL.L), Rexel (RXL.PA), SGH (SGH.AX), Bollore (BOL.PA), Diploma (DPLM.L), Toromont Industries (TIH.TO).
Is QXO expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 29.2× against a peer median of 17.8×, 5th most expensive of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 52% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +178%, so the hurdle is -126 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has QXO stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -38.4% against -4.4% for the median peer; over one year -29.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.