Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › MCS Marcus CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Marcus CorporationMCSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Communication Services›Movies/Entertainment
Momentum strong 78
Mkt cap
$813M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
93%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$5.67M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
30.7×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-2.2 pp
WACC 7.1%
Hurdle
-17 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
118 days
4 Mar 2027
Close · USD$26.76
1D-0.5%
1W+0.8%
1M-1.5%
3M-10.4%
6M+48.9%
YTD+72.5%
1Y+73.7%
ATR %3.5%
Beta0.65
52w lowhigh17.5% off high

What Marcus does

Employees: 8,390

Marcus at a glance

Size Marcus (MCS) is a United States Communication Services company (Movies/Entertainment) with a market value of $813M, the 2384th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $26.76 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 48.9%, against -4.4% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 8.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +3.0%); the operating margin is 5.6% (peer median 6.6%).

Valuation It trades at 30.7× forward earnings against a peer median of 22.1× (6th most expensive of 13).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +26%, so the hurdle is -17 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.2 points below its cost of capital (7.1% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 4.5% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 4 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026MCS 151Peer median 95
Six months, rebased to 100: Marcus against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Marcus financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$817M$758M$736M$730M$677M
Revenue growth—+3%+1%+8%—
Gross profit$236M$207M$205M$201M$172M
EBITDA$116M$91.9M$91.0M$102M$76.9M
Net income$25.2M$12.7M-$7.79M$14.8M-$12.0M
Free cash flow$76.9M$989,000$24.7M$63.9M$56.4M
Capital expenditure$49.1M$83.2M$79.2M$38.8M$36.8M
Total debt$321M$335M$162M$379M$408M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Marcus competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%-25%0%+25%+50%0%+20%300528PSM6005766000883002919010JUVE0880BOWL035900300027FUNCGX96011566TIPSMUSIC5253ANGX079160MCS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Marcus is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+100%+200%20×40×PSM6005763002919010TIMABOWL035900300027CGX9601TIPSMUSICMCSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Marcus is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+25%+50%+75%0%50%PSM6000883002919010TIMABOWL035900FUNCGX9601TIPSMUSIC5253079160MCSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Marcus is the large dot.

Marcus competitors and peer comparison

How Marcus compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Marcus against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureMCSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-1.5%+2.4%6th lowest of 21
6-month return+48.9%-4.4%2nd highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-17.5%-36.4%6th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+8.5%+3.0%9th highest of 21
Operating margin5.6%6.6%9th lowest of 21
Forward P/E30.7×22.1×6th most expensive of 13
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)9.2%5.4%6th most demanding of 14
Growth delivered (Del g)+26.1%+25.2%6th highest of 14
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-17.0 pp-22.0 pp7th most demanding of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital-2.2 pp-0.2 pp7th lowest of 19
EV / EBITDA9.2×10.8×7th cheapest of 14
Net debt / EBITDA2.2×3.7×7th least indebted of 15

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Marcus MCSUnited States$813M+49%+9%6%30.7×9.2%+26.1%
Omnijoi Media 300528.SZChina$820M-7%-1%-26%n/an/an/a
ProSiebenSat.1 Media PSM.DEGermany$830M-16%-8%6%6.9×-11.8%-1.9%
Zhejiang Sunriver Culture Tourism 600576.SSChina$838M-11%+16%17%53.0×n/an/a
China Television Media 600088.SSChina$786M-10%-3%2%n/a31.1%+5.9%
Beijing Baination Pictures 300291.SZChina$874M-2%+217%-134%32.6×24.5%+1.5%
Fuji Kyuko 9010.TJapan$887M+17%+2%16%23.9×5.0%+11.9%
Juventus Football Club JUVE.MIItaly$738M-22%-1%-28%n/an/an/a
ZEAL Network TIMA.DEGermany$969M-18%+12%27%20.3×-7.5%+20.2%
SJM 0880.HKHong Kong$974M-49%-16%6%n/an/an/a
Hollywood Bowl BOWL.LUnited Kingdom$658M+17%+9%24%13.2×-4.4%+25.8%
JYP Entertainment 035900.KSSouth Korea$1.01B-34%+15%18%13.6×-17.4%+41.6%
Huayi Brothers Media 300027.SZChina$648M-14%-24%-125%20.0×n/an/a
Six Flags Entertainment FUNUnited States$1.02B-55%-3%11%n/a5.4%+76.4%
Cineplex CGX.TOCanada$641M+26%-2%9%33.9×3.2%+25.2%
Shochiku 9601.TJapan$1.03B+14%+4%5%44.1×13.5%+13.4%
CA Cultural Technology 1566.HKHong Kong$1.03B+9,743%-2%7%n/an/an/a
Tips Music TIPSMUSIC.NSIndia$1.04B+20%+27%67%39.6×36.6%+32.9%
COVER 5253.TJapan$633M+11%+4%14%13.6×11.4%+53.8%
Angel Studios ANGXUnited States$633M+1%+233%-30%n/an/an/a
CJ CGV 079160.KSSouth Korea$629M+5%+12%5%n/a8.2%+31.3%

Questions

Which companies are Marcus's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Omnijoi Media (300528.SZ), ProSiebenSat.1 Media (PSM.DE), Zhejiang Sunriver Culture Tourism (600576.SS), China Television Media (600088.SS), Beijing Baination Pictures (300291.SZ), Fuji Kyuko (9010.T), Juventus Football Club (JUVE.MI), ZEAL Network (TIMA.DE).
Is Marcus expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 30.7× against a peer median of 22.1×, 6th most expensive of 13 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +26%, so the hurdle is -17 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Marcus stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +48.9% against -4.4% for the median peer; over one year +73.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.