Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 1566.HK CA Cultural Technology Group Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

CA Cultural Technology Group Ltd.1566.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Communication Services›Movies/Entertainment

Hong Kong-listed cultural/media and entertainment technology company; specific business not confirmed with confidence.

Momentum leader 100
Mkt cap
$1.03B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
97%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$5.82M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
n/a
WACC 5.2%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · HKDHK$5.02
1D-14.8%
1W+23.5%
1M+6.9%
3M+9,940.0%
6M+9,743.1%
YTD+9,743.1%
1Y+18,492.6%
ATR %16.1%
52w lowhigh34.2% off high

What CA Cultural Technology does

Hong Kong-listed cultural/media and entertainment technology company; specific business not confirmed with confidence.

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Communication Services
  • Movies/entertainment

Moat: none

Headquarters: China/Hong Kong · Employees: 121

CA Cultural Technology at a glance

Size CA Cultural Technology (1566.HK) is a Hong Kong Communication Services company (Movies/Entertainment) with a market value of $1.03B, the 587th largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$5.02 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 9,743.1%, against -8.2% for the median peer and -13.4% for the Hong Kong market (cap-weighted) — highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 1.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.8%); the operating margin is 6.8% (peer median 9.5%).

Valuation It trades at 25.4× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 3.0× (2nd most expensive of 21).

Relative performance

05000100001500011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20261566.HK 10040Peer median 94
Six months, rebased to 100: CA Cultural Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

CA Cultural Technology financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$360MHK$360MHK$367MHK$364MHK$360M
Revenue growth—-2%+1%+1%—
Gross profitHK$121MHK$115MHK$81.3MHK$52.2M-HK$15.5M
EBITDAHK$44.3MHK$44.4MHK$49.7M-HK$367,000-HK$628M
Net income-HK$99.9M-HK$99.9M-HK$33.0M-HK$171M-HK$1.03B
Free cash flow-HK$871,000-HK$871,000HK$18.1MHK$5.66M-HK$276M
Capital expenditureHK$2.50MHK$2.50MHK$837,000HK$1.70MHK$2.39M
Total debtn/aHK$1.07BHK$1.07BHK$1.06BHK$1.10B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

CA Cultural Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+2,000%+4,000%+6,000%+8,000%0%+20%9601TIPSMUSICFUN0359000880ACELTIMACDA0013309010300291PSM64126007151566.HK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. CA Cultural Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%+40%0×10×20×9601TIPSMUSICFUN0359000880ACELTIMA0013309010300291SAREGAMA600576PSM30052864126000886007151566.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. CA Cultural Technology is the large dot.

CA Cultural Technology competitors and peer comparison

How CA Cultural Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

CA Cultural Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure1566.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+6.9%+4.0%10th highest of 21
6-month return+9,743.1%-8.2%highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-34.2%-33.5%10th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-1.8%+5.8%8th lowest of 21
Operating margin6.8%9.5%10th lowest of 21
EV / Sales25.4×3.0×2nd most expensive of 21
Net debt / EBITDA23.6×2.2×most indebted of 14

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
CA Cultural Technology 1566.HKHong Kong$1.03B+9,743%-2%7%25.4×n/an/a
Shochiku 9601.TJapan$1.03B+14%+4%5%2.1×13.5%+13.4%
Tips Music TIPSMUSIC.NSIndia$1.04B+20%+27%67%22.6×36.6%+32.9%
Six Flags Entertainment FUNUnited States$1.02B-55%-3%11%2.1×5.4%+76.4%
JYP Entertainment 035900.KSSouth Korea$1.01B-34%+15%18%1.2×-17.4%+41.6%
SJM 0880.HKHong Kong$974M-49%-16%6%2.5×n/an/a
Accel Entertainment ACELUnited States$1.10B+18%+9%8%1.0×0.8%+33.3%
ZEAL Network TIMA.DEGermany$969M-18%+12%27%3.5×-7.5%+20.2%
Compagnie des Alpes CDA.PAFrance$1.11B-11%+8%13%1.6×2.6%+17.8%
Bona Film 001330.SZChina$1.17B-25%-29%-34%10.3×24.0%-4.9%
Fuji Kyuko 9010.TJapan$887M+17%+2%16%3.2×5.0%+11.9%
Beijing Baination Pictures 300291.SZChina$874M-2%+217%-134%6.5×24.5%+1.5%
Saregama India SAREGAMA.NSIndia$1.26B+77%-3%28%10.4×n/an/a
Zhejiang Sunriver Culture Tourism 600576.SSChina$838M-11%+16%17%5.6×n/an/a
ProSiebenSat.1 Media PSM.DEGermany$830M-16%-8%6%0.7×-11.8%-1.9%
Omnijoi Media 300528.SZChina$820M-7%-1%-26%8.4×n/an/a
SM ENTERTAINMENT 041510.KSSouth Korea$1.31B-19%+10%14%1.4×-9.1%+15.2%
Marcus MCSUnited States$813M+49%+9%6%1.3×9.2%+26.1%
Heiwa 6412.TJapan$1.32B+16%+47%16%2.8×4.1%+19.1%
China Television Media 600088.SSChina$786M-10%-3%2%4.5×31.1%+5.9%
Cultural Investment 600715.SSChina$1.43B+15%-27%-44%36.3×n/an/a

Questions

Which companies are CA Cultural Technology's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Shochiku (9601.T), Tips Music (TIPSMUSIC.NS), Six Flags Entertainment (FUN), JYP Entertainment (035900.KS), SJM (0880.HK), Accel Entertainment (ACEL), ZEAL Network (TIMA.DE), Compagnie des Alpes (CDA.PA).
Is CA Cultural Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 25.4× against a peer median of 3.0×, 2nd most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has CA Cultural Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +9,743.1% against -8.2% for the median peer; over one year +18,492.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.