Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc.Open in the cockpit ↗

Cheniere Energy, Inc.LNGCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Energy›Oil & Gas Pipelines

US LNG exporter, liquefying and shipping natural gas from Gulf Coast terminals to global buyers under long-term contracts.

Momentum strong 72
Mkt cap
$56.8B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
99%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$694M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
13.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+9.1 pp
WACC 6.1%
Hurdle
-25 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
111 days
25 Feb 2027
Close · USD$277.95
1D-0.6%
1W-15.8%
1M0.0%
3M+4.6%
6M+15.8%
YTD+43.0%
1Y+35.2%
ATR %3.9%
Beta-0.50
52w lowhigh16.0% off high

What Cheniere Energy does

US LNG exporter, liquefying and shipping natural gas from Gulf Coast terminals to global buyers under long-term contracts.

Under long-term take-or-pay contracts, customers pay a fixed liquefaction fee per unit whether or not they take cargoes, plus the cost of the US gas Cheniere buys for them, so the fee stream is stable. Some uncontracted volume is sold at market margin. It shipped its first cargo from Sabine Pass in 2016.

Products and services

  • Sabine Pass LNG terminal
  • Corpus Christi LNG terminal
  • LNG marketing/trading

Customers

  • Utilities/energy companies (Asia, Europe)
  • LNG traders

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Energy infrastructure
  • LNG liquefaction & export
  • Gulf Coast terminals (Sabine Pass…

What could go right

  • Global LNG demand growth (Asia, Europe)
  • New long-term offtake contracts

What could go wrong

  • LNG price/spread volatility
  • Permitting/construction execution risk

Moat: wide (scale, installed base, regulatory licence). First-mover US LNG exporter with permitted terminals and long-term take-or-pay contracts.

Headquarters: Houston, Texas, US · Employees: 1,717

Named competitors

Cheniere Energy at a glance

Size Cheniere Energy (LNG) is a United States Energy company (Oil & Gas Pipelines) with a market value of $56.8B, the 228th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $277.95 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 15.8%, against -1.4% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — highest of 12 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 27.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +12.2%); the operating margin is 30.7% (peer median 31.0%).

Valuation It trades at 13.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 13.9× (6th cheapest of 12).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +16%, so the hurdle is -25 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 9.1 points above its cost of capital (6.1% WACC).

Short interest Short interest is 2.3% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 25 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012014011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026LNG 115Peer median 98
Six months, rebased to 100: Cheniere Energy against the median of its 11 peers (local-currency closes).

Cheniere Energy financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$23.9B$19.6B$15.8B$20.3B$33.8B
Revenue growth—+24%-22%-40%—
Gross profit$7.77B$5.69B$5.29B$8.12B$11.5B
EBITDA$9.42B$7.26B$6.74B$8.84B$12.8B
Net income$3.03B$5.32B$3.25B$9.88B$1.43B
Free cash flow$3.79B$2.46B$3.16B$6.30B$8.69B
Capital expenditure$3.39B$3.08B$2.24B$2.12B$1.83B
Total debt$26.3B$26.4B$26.1B$26.8B$28.0B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Cheniere Energy competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-10%0%+10%-10%0%MPLXTRPETKMIEPDWMBENBVGPPLPAAWESLNG6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Cheniere Energy is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+25%+50%+75%+100%10×20×MPLXTRPETKMIEPDWMBENBVGPPLPAAWESLNGRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Cheniere Energy is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

-10%0%+10%-10%0%10%MPLXTRPETKMIEPDENBPPLPAAWESLNGGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Cheniere Energy is the large dot.

Cheniere Energy competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (LNG vs VG vs WDS vs NEXT)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Cheniere Energy LNG$56.8B+16%+28%31%13.0×-8.6%
Venture Global VG$28.8B+1%+101%38%6.3×n/a
Woodside Energy Group Ltd Sponsored ADR WDS$43.3B-2%-5%26%9.2×n/a
NextDecade NEXT$1.56B-23%n/an/an/an/a
Santos STO.AX$19.2B+11%-8%21%8.1×11.7%
Inpex 1605.T$25.9B-16%-8%49%7.4×-14.4%
Energy Transfer LP ET$65.1B-2%+56%9%11.3×2.6%

How Cheniere Energy compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Cheniere Energy against its 11 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureLNGPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return0.0%-2.5%5th highest of 12
6-month return+15.8%-1.4%highest of 12
Distance from 52-week high-16.0%-13.4%5th lowest of 12
Revenue growth (TTM)+27.7%+12.2%4th highest of 12
Operating margin30.7%31.0%6th lowest of 12
Forward P/E13.0×13.9×6th cheapest of 12
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-8.6%6.5%least demanding of 10
Growth delivered (Del g)+15.9%+8.6%2nd highest of 10
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-24.5 pp-4.1 ppleast demanding of 10
ROIC minus cost of capital+9.1 pp-0.6 pphighest of 12
EV / EBITDA9.2×13.0×2nd cheapest of 11
Net debt / EBITDA2.6×4.1×least indebted of 12

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Cheniere Energy LNGUnited States$56.8B+16%+28%31%13.0×-8.6%+15.9%
Mplx LP MPLXUnited States$56.6B+4%+7%38%12.0×2.7%+6.8%
TC Energy TRP.TOCanada$65.1B-1%+6%46%23.0×11.4%+3.4%
Energy Transfer LP ETUnited States$65.1B-2%+56%9%11.3×2.6%+17.0%
Kinder Morgan KMIUnited States$66.7B-5%+12%29%19.6×7.7%+7.9%
Enterprise Products Partners L.P EPDUnited States$80.0B0%+22%12%11.9×1.0%+14.3%
Williams Companies WMBUnited States$80.1B-10%+10%37%24.9×n/an/a
Enbridge ENB.TOCanada$107B-10%+29%13%22.1×12.6%+10.9%
Venture Global VGUnited States$28.8B+1%+101%38%6.3×n/an/a
Pembina Pipeline PPL.TOCanada$28.3B+11%0%31%22.2×10.7%+5.2%
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P PAAUnited States$16.9B+10%+9%3%13.9×6.5%+13.4%
Western Midstream Partners, LP WESUnited States$16.5B-8%+18%39%9.9×3.2%+8.6%

Questions

Who are Cheniere Energy's main competitors?
Named competitors: Venture Global (VG), Woodside Energy (WDS), NextDecade (NEXT), Sempra Infrastructure (private or unlisted), Tellurian (private or unlisted), Santos (STO.AX). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Mplx LP (MPLX), TC Energy (TRP.TO), Energy Transfer LP (ET), Kinder Morgan (KMI), Enterprise Products Partners L.P (EPD), Williams Companies (WMB).
Is Cheniere Energy expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 13.0× against a peer median of 13.9×, 6th cheapest of 12 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -9% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +16%, so the hurdle is -25 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Cheniere Energy stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +15.8% against -1.4% for the median peer; over one year +35.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.