Loading…

Williams CompaniesWMBCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Energy›Oil & Gas Pipelines

US natural gas pipeline and processing company that gathers, processes and transports roughly a third of US gas.

Momentum weak 33
Mkt cap
$80.1B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$680M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
24.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-0.6 pp
WACC 7.3%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Official | Implied
BBB+ / BBB+
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
108 days
22 Feb 2027
Close · USD$64.08
1D-0.3%
1W-13.8%
1M-11.4%
3M-10.8%
6M-10.3%
YTD+8.2%
1Y+13.9%
ATR %4.2%
Beta0.12
52w lowhigh19.4% off high

What Williams Companies does

US natural gas pipeline and processing company that gathers, processes and transports roughly a third of US gas.

Charges fees for moving and processing other companies' gas, mostly under long-term contracts that reserve capacity, so revenue depends less on the gas price than on volumes. The Transco pipeline, which links Gulf Coast and Appalachian supply to the Northeast and Southeast, is the core asset.

Products and services

  • Transmission & Gulf of Mexico
  • Northeast G&P
  • West/gathering & processing
  • NGL/olefins

Customers

  • Gas producers
  • Utilities/LDCs
  • LNG exporters/power generators

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Energy infrastructure
  • Gas gathering, processing, transmission
  • Interstate pipelines (Transco…

What could go right

  • LNG export demand for feed gas
  • Power-demand-driven gas pipeline expansion

What could go wrong

  • Pipeline permitting/regulatory risk
  • Gas price volatility hitting producer volumes

Moat: wide (scale, regulatory licence, installed base). Transco, the biggest US gas pipeline, has irreplaceable rights-of-way feeding major demand centers.

Headquarters: Tulsa, Oklahoma, US · Founded: 1908 · Employees: 5,987

Named competitors

Williams Companies at a glance

Size Williams Companies (WMB) is a United States Energy company (Oil & Gas Pipelines) with a market value of $80.1B, the 170th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $64.08 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 10.3%, against -0.4% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 10 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 9.7% over the last twelve months (peer median +22.1%); the operating margin is 36.8% (peer median 30.7%).

Valuation It trades at 24.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 13.0× (most expensive of 10).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 0.6 points below its cost of capital (7.3% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $30.7B at 30 Jun 2026, down 4% on a year earlier — 2.0 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Credit Williams Companies has 31 bonds outstanding ($25.8B), rated BBB+ by the agencies and trading like BBB+ at a weighted spread of 92 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 2.2% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 22 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 99WMB 87
Six months, rebased to 100: Williams Companies against the median of its 9 peers (local-currency closes).

Williams Companies financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$12.7B$11.8B$10.8B$9.95B$11.4B
Revenue growth—+10%+8%-12%—
Gross profit$5.50B$4.91B$4.17B$3.85B$3.96B
EBITDA$7.15B$6.63B$5.78B$5.34B$5.39B
Net income$3.13B$2.62B$2.23B$3.18B$2.05B
Free cash flow-$1.68B$899M$2.30B$3.37B$2.61B
Capital expenditure$7.74B$5.00B$2.68B$2.57B$2.28B
Total debt$33.9B$29.5B$27.1B$26.6B$23.1B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Williams Companies competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-10%0%+10%-10%0%EPDKMIETTRPENBLNGMPLXVGPPLWMB6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Williams Companies is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+25%+50%+75%+100%10×20×EPDKMIETTRPENBLNGMPLXVGPPLWMBRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Williams Companies is the large dot.

Williams Companies competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (WMB vs KMI vs ET vs EPD)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Williams Companies WMB$80.1B-10%+10%37%24.9×n/a
Kinder Morgan KMI$66.7B-5%+12%29%19.6×7.7%
Energy Transfer LP ET$65.1B-2%+56%9%11.3×2.6%
Enterprise Products Partners L.P EPD$80.0B0%+22%12%11.9×1.0%
Oneok OKE$53.7B0%+38%15%14.3×4.2%
TC Energy TRP.TO$65.1B-1%+6%46%23.0×11.4%

How Williams Companies compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Williams Companies against its 9 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureWMBPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-11.4%0.0%2nd lowest of 10
6-month return-10.3%-0.4%lowest of 10
Distance from 52-week high-19.4%-13.4%2nd lowest of 10
Revenue growth (TTM)+9.7%+22.1%4th lowest of 10
Operating margin36.8%30.7%4th highest of 10
Forward P/E24.9×13.0×most expensive of 10
ROIC minus cost of capital-0.6 pp+0.5 pp4th lowest of 10
EV / EBITDA16.5×12.7×most expensive of 10
Net debt / EBITDA4.5×4.1×4th most indebted of 10
Bond spread92 bp94 bp4th tightest of 7

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Williams Companies WMBUnited States$80.1B-10%+10%37%24.9×n/an/a
Enterprise Products Partners L.P EPDUnited States$80.0B0%+22%12%11.9×1.0%+14.3%
Kinder Morgan KMIUnited States$66.7B-5%+12%29%19.6×7.7%+7.9%
Energy Transfer LP ETUnited States$65.1B-2%+56%9%11.3×2.6%+17.0%
TC Energy TRP.TOCanada$65.1B-1%+6%46%23.0×11.4%+3.4%
Enbridge ENB.TOCanada$107B-10%+29%13%22.1×12.6%+10.9%
Cheniere Energy LNGUnited States$56.8B+16%+28%31%13.0×-8.6%+15.9%
Mplx LP MPLXUnited States$56.6B+4%+7%38%12.0×2.7%+6.8%
Venture Global VGUnited States$28.8B+1%+101%38%6.3×n/an/a
Pembina Pipeline PPL.TOCanada$28.3B+11%0%31%22.2×10.7%+5.2%

Williams Companies bonds and credit

Williams Companies has 31 bonds outstanding with $25.8B face value. The agencies rate it BBB+; its bonds trade like BBB+. Weighted yield 5.78%, a spread of 92 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Williams Companies backlog

Williams Companies reported $30.7B of remaining performance obligations at 30 Jun 2026, down 4% from a year earlier and down 3% from the previous quarter. That is 2.0 years of trailing revenue already under contract. Book-to-bill last quarter: 0.73.

Questions

Who are Williams Companies's main competitors?
Named competitors: Kinder Morgan (KMI), Energy Transfer (ET), Enterprise Products Partners (EPD), Oneok (OKE), TC Energy (TRP.TO). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Enterprise Products Partners L.P (EPD), Kinder Morgan (KMI), Energy Transfer LP (ET), TC Energy (TRP.TO), Enbridge (ENB.TO), Cheniere Energy (LNG).
Is Williams Companies expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 24.9× against a peer median of 13.0×, most expensive of 10 in its peer set.
How has Williams Companies stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -10.3% against -0.4% for the median peer; over one year +13.9%.
What is Williams Companies's backlog?
Williams Companies's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $30.7B at 30 Jun 2026, -4% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.