Loading…

Lendlease GroupLLC.AXCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Australia · AUD·Industrials›Engineering & Construction

Global property developer, builder and investment manager focused on large urban regeneration and mixed-use projects.

≈ Australia's global property developer, like a smaller Hines/RelatedMomentum weak 28
Mkt cap
$1.23B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
92%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$4.60M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
147.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-6.9 pp
WACC 6.7%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Official | Implied
BBB- / BB
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
101 days
15 Feb 2027
Close · AUDA$2.58
1D-1.9%
1W+12.7%
1M+2.4%
3M-17.0%
6M-16.0%
YTD-50.4%
1Y-52.8%
ATR %4.0%
52w lowhigh53.8% off high

What Lendlease does

Global property developer, builder and investment manager focused on large urban regeneration and mixed-use projects.

Earns development profits as projects are sold or completed, construction fees, and management fees from funds that hold property for institutional investors, so results can swing with project timing. It has been narrowing its geographic footprint and exiting international construction in recent years.

In one line: Australia's global property developer, like a smaller Hines/Related.

Products and services

  • Property development
  • Construction services
  • Investment management (funds)

Customers

  • Institutional investors (funds)
  • Property buyers/tenants
  • Government urban renewal partners

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Land/urban regeneration development
  • Construction
  • Investment management (property funds)

What could go right

  • Urban regeneration project pipeline
  • Build-to-rent portfolio growth

What could go wrong

  • Real estate/construction cycle sensitivity
  • Project execution/cost overrun risk

Moat: narrow (scale, brand). Scale and track record in complex, large-scale urban development projects globally.

Headquarters: Sydney, Australia · Founded: 1958

Named competitors

Lendlease at a glance

Size Lendlease (LLC.AX) is an Australia Industrials company (Engineering & Construction) with a market value of $1.23B, the 160th largest of 316 Australia companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at A$2.58 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 16.0%, against -13.8% for the median peer and +4.1% for the Australia market (cap-weighted) — 9th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 30.0% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.8%); the operating margin is -0.3% (peer median 6.4%).

Valuation It trades at 147.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.7× (most expensive of 16).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 6.9 points below its cost of capital (6.7% WACC).

Credit Lendlease has 3 bonds outstanding ($838M), rated BBB- by the agencies and trading like BB at a weighted spread of 242 bp.

Next results Next results expected around 15 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

809010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 86LLC.AX 82
Six months, rebased to 100: Lendlease against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Lendlease financials

Reported figures in AUD; fiscal year ends 2026-06-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
RevenueA$5.45BA$5.45BA$7.79BA$9.41BA$10.4B
Revenue growth—-30%-17%-10%—
Gross profitA$383MA$383MA$494MA$843MA$612M
EBITDAA$54.0MA$54.0MA$67.0MA$453MA$143M
Net income-A$749M-A$749MA$225M-A$1.50B-A$232M
Free cash flow-A$1.37B-A$1.37B-A$826M-A$86.0M-A$514M
Capital expenditureA$13.0MA$13.0MA$8.00MA$63.0MA$82.0M
Total debtn/aA$4.69BA$4.33BA$4.51BA$3.67B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Lendlease competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%-10%0%0029411065601929GNPEPIC60322099331950301091LLOYDSENGG00282218618926RNWH002061AMRCINSTALTECHNOEWABAGNORCOLLC.AX6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Lendlease is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-25%0%+25%+50%+75%0×50×100×150×1065GNPEPIC993319503010911861TECHNOEWABAGNORCOLLC.AXRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Lendlease is the large dot.

Lendlease competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (LLC.AX vs MGR.AX vs SGP.AX)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Lendlease LLC.AX$1.23B-16%-30%0%147.4×n/a
Mirvac MGR.AX$5.27B+14%+6%20%14.8×n/a
Stockland SGP.AX$7.74B+15%+15%20%12.4×n/a

How Lendlease compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Lendlease against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureLLC.AXPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+2.4%-2.6%5th highest of 21
6-month return-16.0%-13.8%9th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-53.8%-34.6%3rd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-30.0%+8.8%2nd lowest of 21
Operating margin-0.3%6.4%3rd lowest of 21
Forward P/E147.4×15.7×most expensive of 16
ROIC minus cost of capital-6.9 pp-1.3 pp6th lowest of 20
Net debt / EBITDA72.9×0.5×most indebted of 13
Bond spread242 bpn/a—

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Lendlease LLC.AXAustralia$1.23B-16%-30%0%147.4×n/an/a
Xinjiang Communications Construction 002941.SZChina$1.22B-20%+23%5%n/an/an/a
Tianjin Capital Environmental Protection 1065.HKHong Kong$1.22B-13%+2%29%5.4×-16.4%+6.5%
JiShi Media 601929.SSChina$1.25B-18%-2%-24%n/an/an/a
GenusPlus GNP.AXAustralia$1.18B-12%+71%6%18.1×6.2%+32.1%
EPIC Suisse EPIC.SWSwitzerland$1.17B+2%+4%78%20.8×7.1%+4.3%
China Bester Group Telecom 603220.SSChina$1.17B-48%+3%6%20.0×n/an/a
CTCI 9933.TWTaiwan$1.29B+22%-22%9%8.5×n/an/a
Nippon Densetsu Kogyo 1950.TJapan$1.29B-30%+10%12%9.9×-0.1%+3.2%
Shenzhen Urban Transport Technology 301091.SZChina$1.29B-23%+17%2%79.8×n/an/a
Lloyds Engineering Works LLOYDSENGG.NSIndia$1.29B+36%+83%11%n/an/an/a
Shenzhen Zhongzhuang Construction 002822.SZChina$1.15B-15%-56%-96%n/an/an/a
Kumagai Gumi 1861.TJapan$1.30B-20%-4%6%9.0×-9.2%+1.6%
Taiwan Cogeneration 8926.TWTaiwan$1.30B+9%+324%8%n/an/an/a
Renew RNWH.LUnited Kingdom$1.15B+19%+8%6%15.3×7.7%+11.7%
Zhejiang Communications Technology 002061.SZChina$1.30B-15%-12%3%8.0×-6.5%+4.8%
Ameresco AMRCUnited States$1.15B-28%+9%7%15.6×n/an/a
Instalco INSTAL.STSweden$1.15B+9%+9%5%18.4×10.9%+13.8%
Techno Electric & Engineering TECHNOE.NSIndia$1.14B-28%+39%13%18.8×n/an/a
VA Tech Wabag WABAG.NSIndia$1.32B+33%+20%11%27.1×34.6%+6.8%
Norconsult NORCO.OLNorway$1.14B+2%+13%7%15.7×-5.9%+10.6%

Lendlease bonds and credit

Lendlease has 3 bonds outstanding with $838M face value. The agencies rate it BBB-; its bonds trade like BB. Weighted yield 7.08%, a spread of 242 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Lendlease's main competitors?
Named competitors: Mirvac Group (MGR.AX), Stockland (SGP.AX), Multiplex (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Xinjiang Communications Construction (002941.SZ), Tianjin Capital Environmental Protection (1065.HK), JiShi Media (601929.SS), GenusPlus (GNP.AX), EPIC Suisse (EPIC.SW), China Bester Group Telecom (603220.SS).
Is Lendlease expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 147.4× against a peer median of 15.7×, most expensive of 16 in its peer set.
How has Lendlease stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -16.0% against -13.8% for the median peer; over one year -52.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.