Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 9933.TW CTCI CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

CTCI Corporation9933.TWCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Industrials›Engineering & Construction

Major Taiwanese engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contractor building petrochemical, infrastructure and semiconductor-fab facilities.

≈ Taiwan's Fluor/Jacobs Engineering-equivalent EPC contractorMomentum leader 91
Mkt cap
$1.29B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
67%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$8.24M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
8.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+44.6 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
123 days
9 Mar 2027
Close · TWDNT$44.40
1D-2.2%
1W-2.0%
1M-4.2%
3M+24.1%
6M+21.6%
YTD+43.7%
1Y+41.9%
ATR %4.1%
52w lowhigh8.9% off high

What CTCI does

Major Taiwanese engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contractor building petrochemical, infrastructure and semiconductor-fab facilities.

Takes on whole projects under contract, designing, buying equipment and building, and books revenue as work progresses, so profit depends on cost control and a few big contracts at a time. Besides building, it earns from operating and maintaining plants and from environmental and energy projects.

In one line: Taiwan's Fluor/Jacobs Engineering-equivalent EPC contractor.

Products and services

  • Petrochemical plant EPC
  • Semiconductor fab construction
  • Infrastructure EPC

Customers

  • Petrochemical companies
  • Semiconductor manufacturers (e.g., TSMC-related fa
  • Government infrastructure agencies

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Engineering & construction
  • EPC for petrochemical, infrastructure…

What could go right

  • Semiconductor fab construction boom, infrastructure spending

What could go wrong

  • Project timing/cost-overrun risk
  • Petrochemical capex cyclicality

Moat: narrow (process know-how, scale). Large-scale EPC track record and technical expertise needed for complex fab/petrochemical projects.

Headquarters: Taipei, Taiwan · Founded: 1979 · Employees: 3,148

Named competitors

CTCI at a glance

Size CTCI (9933.TW) is a Taiwan Industrials company (Engineering & Construction) with a market value of $1.29B, the 225th largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$44.40 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 21.6%, against -15.7% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — 3rd highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 21.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.4%); the operating margin is 9.3% (peer median 5.9%).

Valuation It trades at 8.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 18.1× (4th cheapest of 14).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 44.6 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 9 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20269933.TW 121Peer median 83
Six months, rebased to 100: CTCI against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

CTCI financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNT$83.1BNT$91.8BNT$120BNT$104BNT$95.1B
Revenue growth—-23%+16%+9%—
Gross profitNT$10.1BNT$9.37BNT$6.60BNT$5.36BNT$5.37B
EBITDANT$8.95BNT$5.31BNT$5.62BNT$4.49BNT$4.70B
Net incomeNT$5.11BNT$1.69BNT$1.94BNT$1.89BNT$2.38B
Free cash flowNT$23.1BNT$8.91B-NT$4.24BNT$1.05B-NT$2.02B
Capital expenditureNT$814MNT$2.46BNT$714MNT$783MNT$2.11B
Total debtNT$32.4BNT$40.2BNT$38.7BNT$28.7BNT$21.0B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

CTCI competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%-10%0%1950301091LLOYDSENGG18618926002061WABAG6019295522LLC0029411065051600600037GNPEPIC6032206002690028229933.TW6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. CTCI is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%+150%0×50×100×150×19503010911861002061WABAG5522LLC600037GNPEPIC9933.TWRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. CTCI is the large dot.

CTCI competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (9933.TW vs FLR vs J vs 2597.TW)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
CTCI 9933.TW$1.29B+22%-22%9%8.5×n/a
Fluor FLR$6.22B+7%-5%-2%14.2×n/a
Jacobs Solutions J$17.4B+26%+20%5%18.6×15.8%
Ruentex Engineering & Construction 2597.TW$1.50B+5%+20%14%n/a-5.0%

How CTCI compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

CTCI against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure9933.TWPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-4.2%-5.2%10th highest of 21
6-month return+21.6%-15.7%3rd highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-8.9%-37.4%2nd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-21.8%+5.4%3rd lowest of 21
Operating margin9.3%5.9%8th highest of 21
Forward P/E8.5×18.1×4th cheapest of 14
ROIC minus cost of capital+44.6 pp-1.7 pphighest of 20
EV / EBITDA2.9×17.5×cheapest of 9
Net debt / EBITDA-2.5×0.7×2nd least indebted of 10

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
CTCI 9933.TWTaiwan$1.29B+22%-22%9%8.5×n/an/a
Nippon Densetsu Kogyo 1950.TJapan$1.29B-30%+10%12%9.9×-0.1%+3.2%
Shenzhen Urban Transport Technology 301091.SZChina$1.29B-23%+17%2%79.8×n/an/a
Lloyds Engineering Works LLOYDSENGG.NSIndia$1.29B+36%+83%11%n/an/an/a
Kumagai Gumi 1861.TJapan$1.30B-20%-4%6%9.0×-9.2%+1.6%
Taiwan Cogeneration 8926.TWTaiwan$1.30B+9%+324%8%n/an/an/a
Zhejiang Communications Technology 002061.SZChina$1.30B-15%-12%3%8.0×-6.5%+4.8%
VA Tech Wabag WABAG.NSIndia$1.32B+33%+20%11%27.1×34.6%+6.8%
JiShi Media 601929.SSChina$1.25B-18%-2%-24%n/an/an/a
Farglory Land Development 5522.TWTaiwan$1.34B-18%+164%26%7.7×-13.6%+3.0%
Lendlease LLC.AXAustralia$1.23B-16%-30%0%147.4×n/an/a
Xinjiang Communications Construction 002941.SZChina$1.22B-20%+23%5%n/an/an/a
Tianjin Capital Environmental Protection 1065.HKHong Kong$1.22B-13%+2%29%5.4×-16.4%+6.5%
Kepco Kps 051600.KSSouth Korea$1.37B-34%+6%9%12.6×-6.1%+3.9%
Beijing Gehua CATV Network 600037.SSChina$1.40B-16%+24%-5%39.4×n/an/a
GenusPlus GNP.AXAustralia$1.18B-12%+71%6%18.1×6.2%+32.1%
EPIC Suisse EPIC.SWSwitzerland$1.17B+2%+4%78%20.8×7.1%+4.3%
Zhejiang Construction Investment 002761.SZChina$1.42B-14%-12%0%n/a13.0%+0.4%
China Bester Group Telecom 603220.SSChina$1.17B-48%+3%6%20.0×n/an/a
Jiangxi Ganyue Expressway 600269.SSChina$1.44B-7%+3%28%n/a-11.6%+4.4%
Shenzhen Zhongzhuang Construction 002822.SZChina$1.15B-15%-56%-96%n/an/an/a

Questions

Who are CTCI's main competitors?
Named competitors: Fluor Corporation (FLR), Jacobs Solutions (J), Ruentex Engineering & Construction (2597.TW). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Nippon Densetsu Kogyo (1950.T), Shenzhen Urban Transport Technology (301091.SZ), Lloyds Engineering Works (LLOYDSENGG.NS), Kumagai Gumi (1861.T), Taiwan Cogeneration (8926.TW), Zhejiang Communications Technology (002061.SZ).
Is CTCI expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 8.5× against a peer median of 18.1×, 4th cheapest of 14 in its peer set.
How has CTCI stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +21.6% against -15.7% for the median peer; over one year +41.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.