Loading…

Kering SAKER.PACompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

France · EUR·Consumer Staples›Consumer Sundries

French luxury goods conglomerate owning Gucci, Saint Laurent, Bottega Veneta and other fashion houses.

Momentum laggard 6
Mkt cap
$25.7B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
57%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$95.6M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
30.9×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-4.7 pp
WACC 9.3%
Hurdle
+10 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BBB+ / A
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
103 days
17 Feb 2027
Close · EUR€187.20
1D-1.8%
1W+5.5%
1M-9.4%
3M-34.0%
6M-23.4%
YTD-37.8%
1Y-40.9%
ATR %4.0%
52w lowhigh42.5% off high

What Kering does

French luxury goods conglomerate owning Gucci, Saint Laurent, Bottega Veneta and other fashion houses.

Sells its own brands' handbags, shoes and clothing mostly through stores it owns, so what customers pay is set by the brand, and Gucci is the largest by a wide margin. The Pinault family controls the group through its holding company Artemis, and a new chief executive arrived in 2025 to attempt a turnaround.

Products and services

  • Gucci
  • Saint Laurent
  • Bottega Veneta
  • Balenciaga

Customers

  • Global luxury consumers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer Staples
  • Luxury goods
  • Fashion, leather goods & accessories

What could go right

  • Gucci turnaround execution
  • China/US luxury demand recovery

What could go wrong

  • Gucci brand momentum/creative risk
  • Chinese luxury demand cyclicality

Moat: wide (brand, IP / patents, distribution). Portfolio of heritage luxury fashion houses with strong brand equity and global retail distribution.

Headquarters: Paris, France · Founded: 1963 · Employees: 43,731

Named competitors

Kering at a glance

Size Kering (KER.PA) is a France Consumer Staples company (Consumer Sundries) with a market value of $25.7B, the 28th largest of 206 France companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at €187.20 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 23.4%, against +1.8% for the median peer and -0.4% for the France market (cap-weighted) — lowest of 7 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 9.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +3.0%); the operating margin is 11.1% (peer median 9.7%).

Valuation It trades at 30.9× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.6× (2nd most expensive of 6).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 12% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +2%, so the hurdle is +10 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.7 points below its cost of capital (9.3% WACC).

Credit Kering has 14 bonds outstanding ($11.6B), rated BBB+ by the agencies and trading like A at a weighted spread of 90 bp.

Next results Next results expected around 17 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 104KER.PA 79
Six months, rebased to 100: Kering against the median of its 6 peers (local-currency closes).

Kering financials

Reported figures in EUR; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue€14.3B€14.7B€16.9B€19.6B€20.4B
Revenue growth—-13%-14%-4%—
Gross profit€10.3B€10.7B€12.4B€14.9B€15.2B
EBITDA€3.60B€3.67B€4.55B€6.57B€7.25B
Net income-€213M€72.0M€1.13B€2.98B€3.61B
Free cash flow€2.83B€1.93B€1.16B€1.86B€3.20B
Capital expenditure€569M€830M€3.31B€2.61B€1.07B
Total debtn/a€18.6B€20.1B€17.8B€11.9B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Kering competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-25%0%+25%+50%+75%-10%0%+10%+20%1913CDI603899CENTWELSPUNLIV300577KER.PA6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Kering is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%20×30×1913603899CENTWELSPUNLIV300577KER.PARevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Kering is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+10%+20%+30%0%20%1913CDI603899CENTWELSPUNLIV300577KER.PAGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Kering is the large dot.

Kering competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (KER.PA vs MC.PA vs CFR.SW vs RMS.PA)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Kering KER.PA$25.7B-23%-9%11%30.9×12.2%
LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton MC.PA$226B-11%-4%22%18.6×10.2%
Compagnie Financiere Richemont CFR.SW$122B+10%+2%21%24.8×10.5%
Hermes International SCA RMS.PA$160B-14%+3%42%30.9×17.9%
Moncler MONC.MI$13.8B-11%+3%29%19.5×10.8%

How Kering compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Kering against its 6 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureKER.PAPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-9.4%+6.5%lowest of 7
6-month return-23.4%+1.8%lowest of 7
Distance from 52-week high-42.5%-19.0%lowest of 7
Revenue growth (TTM)-9.2%+3.0%lowest of 7
Operating margin11.1%9.7%3rd highest of 7
Forward P/E30.9×15.6×2nd most expensive of 6
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)12.2%-3.4%2nd most demanding of 7
Growth delivered (Del g)+2.3%+13.2%lowest of 7
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+9.9 pp-14.7 pp2nd most demanding of 7
ROIC minus cost of capital-4.7 pp+4.7 pplowest of 7
EV / EBITDA9.2×7.9×2nd most expensive of 5
Net debt / EBITDA2.6×1.0×most indebted of 5
Bond spread90 bpn/a—

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Kering KER.PAFrance$25.7B-23%-9%11%30.9×12.2%+2.3%
Prada 1913.HKHong Kong$13.1B+1%+15%20%15.6×-6.4%+18.6%
Christian Dior CDI.PAFrance$89.3B+2%-4%22%n/a-0.3%+12.6%
Shanghai M&G Stationery 603899.SSChina$3.21B-4%+5%6%15.6×-2.8%+13.8%
Central Garden & Pet CENTUnited States$2.64B+25%-1%9%16.0×-4.0%+3.0%
Welspun Living WELSPUNLIV.NSIndia$2.41B+82%+5%8%35.5×32.4%+5.0%
Anhui Korrun 300577.SZChina$678M-11%+1%10%12.1×-4.3%+20.3%

Kering bonds and credit

Kering has 14 bonds outstanding with $11.6B face value. The agencies rate it BBB+; its bonds trade like A. Weighted yield 4.16%, a spread of 90 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Kering's main competitors?
Named competitors: LVMH (MC.PA), Compagnie Financiere Richemont (CFR.SW), Hermes International (RMS.PA), Moncler (MONC.MI). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Prada (1913.HK), Christian Dior (CDI.PA), Shanghai M&G Stationery (603899.SS), Central Garden & Pet (CENT), Welspun Living (WELSPUNLIV.NS), Anhui Korrun (300577.SZ).
Is Kering expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 30.9× against a peer median of 15.6×, 2nd most expensive of 6 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 12% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +2%, so the hurdle is +10 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Kering stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -23.4% against +1.8% for the median peer; over one year -40.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.