Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › CENT Central Garden & Pet CompanyOpen in the cockpit ↗

Central Garden & Pet CompanyCENTCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Consumer Staples›Consumer Sundries

US maker and distributor of lawn/garden products and pet supplies sold through mass and specialty retailers.

Momentum leader 86
Mkt cap
$2.64B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
81%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$4.01M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
16.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+2.9 pp
WACC 7.1%
Hurdle
-7 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
BB / BBB-
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
24 days
30 Nov 2026
Close · USD$47.78
1D-0.3%
1W+4.8%
1M+17.8%
3M+8.8%
6M+25.3%
YTD+48.6%
1Y+52.4%
ATR %2.8%
Beta0.29
52w lowhigh3.1% off high

What Central Garden & Pet does

US maker and distributor of lawn/garden products and pet supplies sold through mass and specialty retailers.

Pet supplies provide steady demand all year, while garden products are seasonal, peaking in spring and depending on the weather. Two giant retailers account for a large share of sales, which gives buyers bargaining power. It has grown by buying brands, and its founder keeps voting control through a separate share class.

Products and services

  • Pet supplies (food, litter, toys)
  • Garden/lawn products (seed, pest control)
  • Live pet/garden retail brands

Customers

  • Mass retailers (Walmart, Home Depot)
  • Pet specialty chains
  • Independent garden centers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer staples
  • Pet and garden product manufacturing
  • Retail distribution

What could go right

  • Pet ownership growth
  • Home and garden spending

What could go wrong

  • Commodity input costs
  • Private-label competition

Moat: narrow (brand, scale, distribution). Portfolio of leading pet and garden brands with broad retail distribution relationships.

Headquarters: Walnut Creek, California, US · Founded: 1955 · Employees: 6,000

Named competitors

Central Garden & Pet at a glance

Size Central Garden & Pet (CENT) is a United States Consumer Staples company (Consumer Sundries) with a market value of $2.64B, the 1621st largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $47.78 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 25.3%, against -1.3% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 7 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 1.2% over the last twelve months (peer median +3.0%); the operating margin is 8.8% (peer median 10.8%).

Valuation It trades at 16.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 15.6× (3rd most expensive of 6).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +3%, so the hurdle is -7 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.9 points above its cost of capital (7.1% WACC).

Credit Central Garden & Pet has 3 bonds outstanding ($1.20B), rated BB by the agencies and trading like BBB- at a weighted spread of 117 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 3.8% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 30 Nov 2026 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026CENT 127Peer median 99
Six months, rebased to 100: Central Garden & Pet against the median of its 6 peers (local-currency closes).

Central Garden & Pet financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-09-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$3.08B$3.13B$3.20B$3.31B$3.34B
Revenue growth—-2%-3%-1%—
Gross profit$978M$973M$926M$912M$957M
EBITDA$353M$350M$314M$350M$390M
Net income$166M$163M$108M$126M$152M
Free cash flow$343M$291M$352M$328M-$152M
Capital expenditure$44.7M$41.4M$43.1M$54.0M$115M
Total debt$1.41B$1.44B$1.42B$1.37B$1.38B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Central Garden & Pet competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-25%0%+25%+50%+75%-10%0%+10%+20%WELSPUNLIV6038993005771913KERCDICENT6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Central Garden & Pet is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%20×30×WELSPUNLIV6038993005771913KERCENTRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Central Garden & Pet is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+10%+20%+30%0%20%WELSPUNLIV6038993005771913KERCDICENTGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Central Garden & Pet is the large dot.

Central Garden & Pet competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (CENT vs SPB vs SMG vs CHD)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Central Garden & Pet CENT$2.64B+25%-1%9%16.0×-4.0%
Spectrum Brands SPB$1.99B+6%+1%9%17.1×-2.5%
Scotts Miracle-Gro SMG$3.77B+6%-4%14%13.6×7.5%
Church & Dwight CHD$25.8B+17%+2%18%27.4×6.9%

How Central Garden & Pet compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Central Garden & Pet against its 6 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureCENTPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+17.8%+5.1%highest of 7
6-month return+25.3%-1.3%2nd highest of 7
Distance from 52-week high-3.1%-23.6%highest of 7
Revenue growth (TTM)-1.2%+3.0%3rd lowest of 7
Operating margin8.8%10.8%3rd lowest of 7
Forward P/E16.0×15.6×3rd most expensive of 6
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-4.0%-1.5%3rd least demanding of 7
Growth delivered (Del g)+3.0%+13.2%2nd lowest of 7
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-7.1 pp-14.7 pp3rd most demanding of 7
ROIC minus cost of capital+2.9 pp+4.5 pp4th highest of 7
EV / EBITDA8.6×8.2×3rd cheapest of 5
Net debt / EBITDA1.1×1.4×3rd least indebted of 5
Bond spread117 bpn/a—

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Central Garden & Pet CENTUnited States$2.64B+25%-1%9%16.0×-4.0%+3.0%
Welspun Living WELSPUNLIV.NSIndia$2.41B+82%+5%8%35.5×32.4%+5.0%
Shanghai M&G Stationery 603899.SSChina$3.21B-4%+5%6%15.6×-2.8%+13.8%
Anhui Korrun 300577.SZChina$678M-11%+1%10%12.1×-4.3%+20.3%
Prada 1913.HKHong Kong$13.1B+1%+15%20%15.6×-6.4%+18.6%
Kering KER.PAFrance$25.7B-23%-9%11%30.9×12.2%+2.3%
Christian Dior CDI.PAFrance$89.3B+2%-4%22%n/a-0.3%+12.6%

Central Garden & Pet bonds and credit

Central Garden & Pet has 3 bonds outstanding with $1.20B face value. The agencies rate it BB; its bonds trade like BBB-. Weighted yield 5.73%, a spread of 117 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Central Garden & Pet's main competitors?
Named competitors: Spectrum Brands (SPB), Scotts Miracle-Gro (SMG), Church & Dwight (CHD), Nestlé Purina (private or unlisted). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Welspun Living (WELSPUNLIV.NS), Shanghai M&G Stationery (603899.SS), Anhui Korrun (300577.SZ), Prada (1913.HK), Kering (KER.PA), Christian Dior (CDI.PA).
Is Central Garden & Pet expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 16.0× against a peer median of 15.6×, 3rd most expensive of 6 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -4% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +3%, so the hurdle is -7 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Central Garden & Pet stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +25.3% against -1.3% for the median peer; over one year +52.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.