Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › III.TO Imperial Metals CorporationOpen in the cockpit ↗

Imperial Metals CorporationIII.TOCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Canada · CAD·Materials›Other Metals/Minerals

Operates the Red Chris and Mount Polley copper-gold mines in British Columbia, Canada.

Momentum laggard 16
Mkt cap
$759M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
48%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$729,496
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
7.6×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+5.0 pp
WACC 8.0%
Hurdle
-44 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
131 days
17 Mar 2027
Close · CADC$5.97
1D-1.3%
1W-4.2%
1M-26.7%
3M-30.2%
6M-2.0%
YTD-40.3%
1Y-5.7%
ATR %6.7%
52w lowhigh57.4% off high

What Imperial Metals does

Operates the Red Chris and Mount Polley copper-gold mines in British Columbia, Canada.

Sells copper-gold concentrate from its mines to smelters at prices set by metal markets, with Mount Polley wholly owned and Red Chris a joint venture in which Newmont holds the larger share. A 2014 tailings dam failure at Mount Polley led to a long, costly shutdown and clean-up.

Products and services

  • Red Chris mine (JV with Newmont)
  • Mount Polley mine

Customers

  • Copper/gold smelters and traders

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Base/precious metals
  • Copper-gold mining
  • Open-pit/underground production, BC

What could go right

  • Copper/gold price strength
  • Red Chris underground ramp-up

What could go wrong

  • Legacy tailings/environmental risk
  • High leverage/legacy debt

Moat: narrow (installed base, regulatory licence). Owns permitted, producing mines in a stable jurisdiction with existing infrastructure.

Headquarters: Vancouver, Canada · Employees: 463

Named competitors

Imperial Metals at a glance

Size Imperial Metals (III.TO) is a Canada Materials company (Other Metals/Minerals) with a market value of $759M, the 287th largest of 420 Canada companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at C$5.97 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 2.0%, against -23.3% for the median peer and +5.2% for the Canada market (cap-weighted) — 7th highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 4.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +32.4%); the operating margin is 31.6% (peer median 4.5%).

Valuation It trades at 7.6× forward earnings against a peer median of 29.9× (cheapest of 9).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +36%, so the hurdle is -44 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 5.0 points above its cost of capital (8.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 17 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

7510012515011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026III.TO 95Peer median 74
Six months, rebased to 100: Imperial Metals against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Imperial Metals financials

Reported figures in CAD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueC$660MC$692MC$494MC$344MC$173M
Revenue growth—+40%+44%+99%—
Gross profitC$229MC$295MC$155M-C$19.5M-C$35.3M
EBITDAC$323MC$380MC$212MC$22.2M-C$64.4M
Net incomeC$108MC$154MC$106M-C$36.7M-C$76.0M
Free cash flowC$75.7MC$127M-C$26.8M-C$126M-C$231M
Capital expenditureC$217MC$222MC$182MC$122MC$145M
Total debtC$198MC$179MC$373MC$320MC$198M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Imperial Metals competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-75%-50%-25%0%+25%-25%0%+25%MIDHANI301613688456002141300697TALANCXGROYDVPLAC300283603399002088TLOLARNVRISGMLIII.TO6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Imperial Metals is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-25%0%+25%+50%+75%20×40×60×MIDHANI688456GROYDVP002088SGMLIII.TORevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Imperial Metals is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%+60%0%25%50%MIDHANI301613002141GROY002088SGMLIII.TOGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Imperial Metals is the large dot.

Imperial Metals competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (III.TO vs NEM vs CS.TO vs TKO.TO)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Imperial Metals III.TO$759M-2%+5%32%7.6×-7.6%
Newmont NEM$126B+4%+23%55%12.7×-8.9%
Capstone Copper CS.TO$6.01B-8%+30%32%9.4×9.8%
Trekor Metals TKO.TO$2.57B-1%+68%28%9.8×n/a
Hudbay Minerals HBM.TO$9.35B-10%+13%32%12.0×18.1%

How Imperial Metals compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Imperial Metals against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureIII.TOPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-26.7%-17.4%2nd lowest of 21
6-month return-2.0%-23.3%7th highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-57.4%-47.1%7th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+4.8%+32.4%5th lowest of 13
Operating margin31.6%4.5%highest of 14
Forward P/E7.6×29.9×cheapest of 9
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-7.6%17.8%least demanding of 7
Growth delivered (Del g)+36.1%+6.0%3rd highest of 7
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-43.7 pp+12.1 ppleast demanding of 7
ROIC minus cost of capital+5.0 pp-8.4 pp2nd highest of 19
EV / EBITDA3.6×30.3×cheapest of 6
Net debt / EBITDA0.3×0.7×3rd least indebted of 6

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Imperial Metals III.TOCanada$759M-2%+5%32%7.6×-7.6%+36.1%
Mishra Dhatu Nigam MIDHANI.NSIndia$753M-8%+18%14%39.9×45.3%+8.2%
Alnera Aluminium 301613.SZChina$749M-36%+31%5%n/a13.7%+56.0%
GRIPM Advanced Materials 688456.SSChina$780M-24%+34%2%49.6×n/an/a
Infund 002141.SZChina$738M+32%-3%11%n/a8.4%+3.8%
Jiangyin Electrical Alloy 300697.SZChina$791M-24%+54%5%n/an/an/a
Talamore Mining TALA.TOCanada$728M-32%n/an/an/an/an/a
NorthIsle Copper and Gold NCX.VCanada$725M+3%n/an/an/an/an/a
Gold Royalty GROYUnited States$723M-14%+82%23%39.4×54.3%+58.2%
Develop Global DVP.AXAustralia$801M-43%+68%4%11.8×n/an/a
Lithium Americas LAC.TOCanada$712M-64%n/an/an/an/an/a
Wenzhou Hongfeng Electrical Alloy 300283.SZChina$712M-23%+48%5%n/an/an/a
Jinzhou Yongshan Lithium 603399.SSChina$821M-45%+50%2%n/an/an/a
IMC Rare Earths IMCUnited States$824Mn/an/an/an/an/an/a
Luyang Energy-Saving Materials 002088.SZChina$837M+12%-21%1%58.4×20.8%+1.3%
Talon Metals TLO.TOCanada$839M+3%n/a3%17.9×n/an/a
Lithium Argentina LARUnited States$686M-64%n/an/a13.9×n/an/a
Enviri NVRIUnited States$672M+24%-23%-19%n/an/an/a
Gruvaktiebolaget Viscaria VISC.STSweden$669M-1%n/an/an/an/an/a
Sigma Lithium SGMLUnited States$655M-73%-14%24%20.5×14.8%-13.9%
Marimaca Copper MARI.TOCanada$652M-18%n/an/an/an/an/a

Questions

Who are Imperial Metals's main competitors?
Named competitors: Newmont (NEM), Capstone Copper (CS.TO), Taseko Mines (TKO.TO), Hudbay Minerals (HBM.TO). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Mishra Dhatu Nigam (MIDHANI.NS), Alnera Aluminium (301613.SZ), GRIPM Advanced Materials (688456.SS), Infund (002141.SZ), Jiangyin Electrical Alloy (300697.SZ), Talamore Mining (TALA.TO).
Is Imperial Metals expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 7.6× against a peer median of 29.9×, cheapest of 9 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -8% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +36%, so the hurdle is -44 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Imperial Metals stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -2.0% against -23.3% for the median peer; over one year -5.7%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.