Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › F99.SI Fraser & Neave Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Fraser & Neave Ltd.F99.SICompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Singapore · SGD·Consumer Staples›Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy

Singapore beverage and dairy conglomerate making soft drinks like 100PLUS and dairy products under the F&N and Magnolia brands.

≈ Singapore's beverage and dairy conglomerate (F&N)Momentum strong 66
Mkt cap
$1.53B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
100%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$23,165
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-1.1 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-5 pp
Req g minus delivered
Close · SGDS$1.34
1D0.0%
1W-0.7%
1M-0.7%
3M-6.9%
6M-7.6%
YTD-8.8%
1Y-8.8%
ATR %1.1%
52w lowhigh16.2% off high

What Fraser & Neave does

Singapore beverage and dairy conglomerate making soft drinks like 100PLUS and dairy products under the F&N and Magnolia brands.

Since selling its beer stake in 2012 it has focused on soft drinks and dairy, sold through supermarkets, convenience stores and food service. Thai Beverage is its largest shareholder.

In one line: Singapore's beverage and dairy conglomerate (F&N).

Products and services

  • Soft drinks (100PLUS, F&N)
  • Dairy products (Magnolia)
  • Printing & publishing

Customers

  • Retail consumers across Singapore, Malaysia, South

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Consumer staples
  • Beverage & dairy manufacturing
  • Regional brand distribution

What could go right

  • Southeast Asia beverage/dairy consumption growth
  • Regional expansion

What could go wrong

  • Sugar tax/health regulation impact
  • Raw material (dairy, sugar) cost volatility

Moat: narrow (brand, distribution, scale). Established regional beverage/dairy brands with strong distribution networks in Singapore/Malaysia.

Headquarters: Singapore · Founded: 1883 · Employees: 7,200

Named competitors

Fraser & Neave at a glance

Size Fraser & Neave (F99.SI) is a Singapore Consumer Staples company (Food: Meat/Fish/Dairy) with a market value of $1.53B, the 56th largest of 186 Singapore companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at S$1.34 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 7.6%, against -6.3% for the median peer and -1.2% for the Singapore market (cap-weighted) — 10th lowest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 2.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +3.2%); the operating margin is 9.9% (peer median 2.7%).

Valuation It trades at 1.6× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 1.0× (8th most expensive of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 0% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +5%, so the hurdle is -5 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.1 points below its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Relative performance

909510011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 93F99.SI 92
Six months, rebased to 100: Fraser & Neave against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Fraser & Neave financials

Reported figures in SGD; fiscal year ends 2025-09-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueS$2.25BS$2.32BS$2.16BS$2.10BS$2.00B
Revenue growth—+7%+3%+5%—
Gross profitS$640MS$639MS$602MS$535MS$489M
EBITDAS$311MS$314MS$289MS$239MS$216M
Net incomeS$140MS$141MS$151MS$133MS$125M
Free cash flowS$102MS$61.8MS$198MS$225M-S$20.8M
Capital expenditureS$235MS$231MS$114MS$148MS$147M
Total debtn/aS$1.13BS$1.20BS$1.17BS$936M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Fraser & Neave competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%+100%0%+50%+100%2296600882600597BGA2270SCST605179BELL002086NWL1333002515002946600429F99.SI6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Fraser & Neave is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%+30%0×10×20×2296600882600597BGA2270SCST605179002086NWL22069858002515300997MILKYMISTF99.SIRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Fraser & Neave is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%+40%0%20%40%600882600597BGASCSTAUSSBELLNWL22069858600429F99.SIGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Fraser & Neave is the large dot.

Fraser & Neave competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (F99.SI vs Y92.SI vs Y03.SI)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
Fraser & Neave F99.SI$1.53B-8%-3%10%1.6×0.1%
Thai Beverage Public Y92.SI$8.56B+2%-8%13%1.6×-4.7%
Yeo Hiap Seng Y03.SI$259M-14%-3%-7%0.5×n/a

How Fraser & Neave compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Fraser & Neave against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureF99.SIPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-0.7%+1.1%8th lowest of 21
6-month return-7.6%-6.3%10th lowest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-16.2%-21.6%9th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-2.5%+3.2%2nd lowest of 21
Operating margin9.9%2.7%highest of 21
EV / Sales1.6×1.0×8th most expensive of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)0.1%7.5%least demanding of 12
Growth delivered (Del g)+4.8%+10.7%5th lowest of 12
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-4.8 pp-1.0 pp5th least demanding of 12
ROIC minus cost of capital-1.1 pp-1.0 pp11th highest of 21
EV / EBITDA11.5×7.7×4th most expensive of 11
Net debt / EBITDA3.4×1.8×4th most indebted of 14

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Fraser & Neave F99.SISingapore$1.53B-8%-3%10%1.6×0.1%+4.8%
Itoham Yonekyu 2296.TJapan$1.53B-13%+3%3%0.4×n/an/a
Shanghai Milkground Food Tech 600882.SSChina$1.55B-1%+26%4%1.6×11.1%+14.7%
Bright Dairy & Food 600597.SSChina$1.43B-6%-3%0%0.4×18.8%-1.1%
Bega Cheese BGA.AXAustralia$1.36B+23%+7%3%0.6×18.4%+12.7%
MEGMILK SNOW BRAND 2270.TJapan$1.36B+12%0%3%0.4×n/an/a
Scandi Standard SCST.STSweden$1.35B+38%+8%5%1.0×1.8%+7.2%
Austevoll Seafood AUSS.OLNorway$1.79B-8%-1%7%1.0×2.5%+11.9%
Zhejiang Yiming Food 605179.SSChina$1.27B+22%0%2%3.1×n/an/a
Bell Food BELL.SWSwitzerland$1.98B+42%+2%3%0.5×2.9%+4.0%
Shandong Oriental Ocean Sci-Tech 002086.SZChina$1.17B+94%+6%-35%21.3×n/an/a
NewPrinces NWL.MIItaly$1.16B+40%+81%1%0.3×0.6%+44.5%
Umios 1333.TJapan$1.14B-10%+3%3%0.2×n/an/a
Ezaki Glico 2206.TJapan$2.07B-11%+10%3%0.7×7.5%+1.0%
China Youran Dairy 9858.HKHong Kong$2.15B-4%+7%-2%1.8×17.8%+11.1%
Jinzi Ham 002515.SZChina$1.06B-15%-2%-11%19.7×n/an/a
Morinaga Milk Industry 2264.TJapan$2.21B-9%+2%6%0.8×n/an/a
HUANLEJIA Food 300997.SZChina$1.06B-17%+4%7%4.4×n/an/a
New Hope Dairy 002946.SZChina$2.22B-13%+7%9%1.4×1.9%+10.7%
Beijing Sanyuan Foods 600429.SSChina$973M-29%0%-1%1.2×24.8%-2.8%
Milky Mist Dairy Food MILKYMIST.NSIndia$2.42Bn/a+34%8%7.3×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Fraser & Neave's main competitors?
Named competitors: Thai Beverage (Y92.SI), Nestle Malaysia (private or unlisted), Yeo Hiap Seng (Y03.SI). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Itoham Yonekyu (2296.T), Shanghai Milkground Food Tech (600882.SS), Bright Dairy & Food (600597.SS), Bega Cheese (BGA.AX), MEGMILK SNOW BRAND (2270.T), Scandi Standard (SCST.ST).
Is Fraser & Neave expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 1.6× against a peer median of 1.0×, 8th most expensive of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 0% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +5%, so the hurdle is -5 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Fraser & Neave stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -7.6% against -6.3% for the median peer; over one year -8.8%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.