Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › CXO.AX Core Lithium LtdOpen in the cockpit ↗

Core Lithium LtdCXO.AXCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Australia · AUD·Materials›Other Metals/Minerals
Momentum laggard 10
Mkt cap
$516M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
94%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$4.54M
20-day average traded
P/B
1.98×
price to book
ROE
-8.5%
delivered
Implied ROE
22.8%
what the price asks
Next earnings
125 days
11 Mar 2027
Close · AUDA$0.23
1D0.0%
1W+9.5%
1M-13.2%
3M-32.4%
6M-35.2%
YTD-16.4%
1Y+58.6%
ATR %9.5%
52w lowhigh46.5% off high

What Core Lithium does

No business profile yet.

Core Lithium at a glance

Size Core Lithium (CXO.AX) is an Australia Materials company (Other Metals/Minerals) with a market value of $516M, the 259th largest of 316 Australia companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at A$0.23 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 35.2%, against -30.7% for the median peer and +4.1% for the Australia market (cap-weighted) — 8th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth The operating margin is -160.1% (peer median 10.3%).

Valuation It trades at 1.98× book value against a peer median of 1.47× (8th most expensive of 21).

Price implies The share price implies a return on equity of about 22.8%; Core Lithium delivers -8.5%, so the price asks more than the business earns today.

Next results Next results expected around 11 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

608010012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 69CXO.AX 66
Six months, rebased to 100: Core Lithium against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Core Lithium financials

Reported figures in AUD; fiscal year ends 2026-06-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
RevenueA$17.8MA$17.8MA$0A$189MA$50.6M
Revenue growth——-100%+275%—
Gross profitA$5.21MA$4.74M-A$988,000-A$34.6MA$30.6M
EBITDA-A$28.1M-A$31.8M-A$20.3M-A$48.1MA$20.6M
Net income-A$26.0M-A$26.0M-A$23.4M-A$207MA$10.8M
Free cash flow-A$42.9M-A$42.9M-A$55.7M-A$139M-A$59.8M
Capital expenditureA$24.0MA$24.0MA$19.4MA$87.2MA$166M
Total debtn/aA$33.9MA$2.91MA$3.53MA$22.9M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Core Lithium competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%-30%-20%-10%0%600382DYL5009S20301026002066LMCU002593ISO002225LIN300936GSMECORMOILLXFRBMN38335726CXO.AX6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Core Lithium is the large dot.

Fundamentals: return on equity against price-to-book

-20%-10%0%10%10×20×30×600382DYL5009S20301026002066LMCU002593ISO002225LIN300936GSMECORMOILLXFR9936BMN38335726CXO.AXReturn on equity →Price / book →
A bank or insurer earning more on its equity usually trades at a higher multiple of book; points far above the trend are priced for more. Core Lithium is the large dot.

Capital: ROE delivered against the ROE the price implies

-20%0%20%40%-20%0%20%40%600382DYL5009S20301026002066ISO002225LIN300936ECORMOILLXFR9936BMNCXO.AXROE delivered →ROE the price implies →
Above the diagonal = the price asks for a higher return on equity than the business earns today. Core Lithium is the large dot.

Core Lithium competitors and peer comparison

How Core Lithium compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Core Lithium against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureCXO.AXPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-13.2%-14.6%10th highest of 21
6-month return-35.2%-30.7%8th lowest of 21
Return on equity-8.5%3.0%5th lowest of 21
Price / book1.98×1.47×8th most expensive of 21
ROE the price implies22.8%11.8%6th most demanding of 21
ROE delivered-8.5%3.9%4th lowest of 20

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthROEPrice / bookImplied ROEDelivered ROE
Core Lithium CXO.AXAustralia$516M-35%n/a-9%1.98×22.8%-8.5%
Guangdong Mingzhu 600382.SSChina$512M-36%-6%1%1.15×7.3%1.3%
Deep Yellow DYL.AXAustralia$510M-57%n/a2%1.11×16.0%2.1%
Gloria Material Technology 5009.TWOTaiwan$527M-15%+3%8%0.95×3.5%7.9%
Straits Trading S20.SISingapore$541M-14%+30%-17%0.55×4.6%-16.6%
Hootech 301026.SZChina$541M-27%+121%14%2.07×24.0%14.5%
Ruitai Materials Technology 002066.SZChina$489M-40%-1%-21%5.77×48.5%-21.1%
Lumina Metals LMCU.TOCanada$544M-33%n/a-50%2.22×37.7%n/a
Xiamen Sunrise 002593.SZChina$485M-25%+5%6%1.29×8.4%6.2%
IsoEnergy ISO.TOCanada$549M-30%n/a-3%1.42×10.7%-2.7%
Puyang Refractories 002225.SZChina$550M-28%+2%1%0.91×8.0%0.9%
Lindian Resources LIN.AXAustralia$481M-50%n/a-21%2.83×13.0%-21.0%
Changzhou Zhongying Science & Technology 300936.SZChina$556M-32%+15%1%3.69×33.2%0.6%
Ferroglobe GSMUnited States$477M-37%+4%4%0.61×7.8%3.9%
Ecora Royalties ECOR.LUnited Kingdom$475M-4%+168%11%0.97×10.7%11.0%
Moil MOIL.NSIndia$465M-32%+3%11%1.55×20.5%10.7%
Luxfer LXFRUnited States$463M+11%-9%4%2.09×18.6%4.2%
Ximei Resources 9936.HKHong Kong$461M-40%+52%16%1.52×6.5%16.0%
Bannerman Energy BMN.AXAustralia$578M-15%n/a-4%2.69×28.8%-3.6%
Xinjiang Xinxin Mining Industry 3833.HKHong Kong$457M-39%+20%7%0.55×8.2%6.7%
OSAKA Titanium Technologies 5726.TJapan$584M-18%-8%7%1.70×14.8%7.3%

Questions

Which companies are Core Lithium's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Guangdong Mingzhu (600382.SS), Deep Yellow (DYL.AX), Gloria Material Technology (5009.TWO), Straits Trading (S20.SI), Hootech (301026.SZ), Ruitai Materials Technology (002066.SZ), Lumina Metals (LMCU.TO), Xiamen Sunrise (002593.SZ).
Is Core Lithium expensive compared with its peers?
On price / book it trades at 1.98× against a peer median of 1.47×, 8th most expensive of 21 in its peer set. The share price implies a return on equity of about 22.8%; Core Lithium delivers -8.5%, so the price asks more than the business earns today.
How has Core Lithium stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -35.2% against -30.7% for the median peer; over one year +58.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.