Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › CDA.AX Codan LimitedOpen in the cockpit ↗

Codan LimitedCDA.AXCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Australia · AUD·Industrials›Tools & Hardware

Australian electronics maker known for Minelab metal detectors and Codan secure communications radios for defence and emergency services.

≈ A niche Australian defence-electronics/metal-detection makerMomentum leader 94
Mkt cap
$6.88B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
62%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$27.4M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
36.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+17.6 pp
WACC 10.0%
Hurdle
+12 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
110 days
24 Feb 2027
Close · AUDA$54.49
1D-2.9%
1W-8.4%
1M-15.6%
3M+33.7%
6M+41.4%
YTD+91.7%
1Y+59.9%
ATR %5.5%
52w lowhigh22.3% off high

What Codan does

Australian electronics maker known for Minelab metal detectors and Codan secure communications radios for defence and emergency services.

Sells Minelab detectors through dealers and distributors worldwide, with demand strongest in gold-prospecting markets in Africa and Australia. Radios go to governments and aid agencies in large contract orders, which makes sales lumpier.

In one line: A niche Australian defence-electronics/metal-detection maker.

Products and services

  • Minelab metal detectors
  • Tactical/defence communications radios
  • Mining technology (ore sorting)

Customers

  • Consumer/recreational and gold-prospecting metal d
  • Defence forces and emergency services (radios)

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Electronics manufacturing
  • Metal detection equipment (Minelab)
  • Communications equipment…

What could go right

  • Gold price-driven prospecting demand
  • Defence communications contract wins

What could go wrong

  • Consumer discretionary spending sensitivity (detectors)
  • Defence procurement cycle timing

Moat: narrow (brand, IP / patents). Minelab is the leading global brand in gold-prospecting metal detectors; radios have niche defence-grade IP.

Headquarters: Adelaide, Australia · Founded: 1959 · Employees: 1,100

Named competitors

Codan at a glance

Size Codan (CDA.AX) is an Australia Industrials company (Tools & Hardware) with a market value of $6.88B, the 51st largest of 316 Australia companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at A$54.49 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 41.4%, against -4.9% for the median peer and +4.1% for the Australia market (cap-weighted) — 2nd highest of 7 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 29.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.6%); the operating margin is 27.7% (peer median 14.7%).

Valuation It trades at 36.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 17.4× (most expensive of 7).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 26% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +15%, so the hurdle is +12 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 17.6 points above its cost of capital (10.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 24 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012515017511 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026CDA.AX 135Peer median 97
Six months, rebased to 100: Codan against the median of its 6 peers (local-currency closes).

Codan financials

Reported figures in AUD; fiscal year ends 2026-06-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
RevenueA$875MA$875MA$674MA$550MA$456M
Revenue growth—+30%+22%+21%—
Gross profitA$466MA$466MA$339MA$269MA$219M
EBITDAn/aA$287MA$184MA$148MA$121M
Net incomeA$175MA$175MA$103MA$81.4MA$67.8M
Free cash flowA$241MA$241MA$138MA$96.3MA$61.8M
Capital expenditureA$63.3MA$63.3MA$62.4MA$50.8MA$49.4M
Total debtn/aA$57.4MA$161MA$141MA$125M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Codan competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%0%+20%6586002444ALLESWKSNAHUSQ-ACDA.AX6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Codan is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%+30%20×30×6586002444ALLESWKSNAHUSQ-ACDA.AXRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Codan is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+10%+20%0%10%20%6586002444ALLESWKSNAHUSQ-ACDA.AXGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Codan is the large dot.

Codan competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (CDA.AX vs LHX vs MSI vs 002583.SZ)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Codan CDA.AX$6.88B+41%+30%28%36.4×26.4%
L3Harris LHX$48.4B-13%+7%12%20.1×7.0%
Motorola Solutions MSI$85.1B+34%+10%25%27.0×16.4%
Hytera Communications 002583.SZ$2.17B-20%+4%7%19.4×n/a
Elbit Systems ESLT$32.0B-13%+12%9%46.5×10.1%
Thales HO.PA$51.1B-1%+7%11%20.6×-2.8%

How Codan compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Codan against its 6 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureCDA.AXPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-15.6%+7.0%lowest of 7
6-month return+41.4%-4.9%2nd highest of 7
Distance from 52-week high-22.3%-12.8%3rd lowest of 7
Revenue growth (TTM)+29.8%+4.6%highest of 7
Operating margin27.7%14.7%highest of 7
Forward P/E36.4×17.4×most expensive of 7
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)26.4%4.2%most demanding of 7
Growth delivered (Del g)+14.9%+5.3%highest of 7
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+11.6 pp-3.5 ppmost demanding of 7
ROIC minus cost of capital+17.6 pp+2.6 pphighest of 7

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Codan CDA.AXAustralia$6.88B+41%+30%28%36.4×26.4%+14.9%
Makita 6586.TJapan$8.78B-9%+9%14%16.6×0.6%+5.0%
Hangzhou GreatStar Industrial 002444.SZChina$5.33B-13%+6%15%13.0×5.8%+11.5%
Allegion ALLEUnited States$15.6B+39%+10%22%18.7×7.6%+8.4%
Stanley Black & Decker SWKUnited States$17.3B+43%0%10%18.3×6.8%+3.0%
Snap-on SNAUnited States$18.9B-1%+3%25%18.3×2.7%+5.5%
Husqvarna HUSQ-A.STSweden$1.94B-24%-6%6%13.5×-2.0%+2.1%

Questions

Who are Codan's main competitors?
Named competitors: Garrett Metal Detectors (private or unlisted), L3Harris Technologies (LHX), Motorola Solutions (MSI), Hytera Communications (002583.SZ), Elbit Systems (ESLT), Thales (HO.PA). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Makita (6586.T), Hangzhou GreatStar Industrial (002444.SZ), Allegion (ALLE), Stanley Black & Decker (SWK), Snap-on (SNA), Husqvarna (HUSQ-A.ST).
Is Codan expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 36.4× against a peer median of 17.4×, most expensive of 7 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 26% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +15%, so the hurdle is +12 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Codan stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +41.4% against -4.9% for the median peer; over one year +59.9%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.