Loading…

Snap-onSNACompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Industrials›Tools & Hardware

Makes professional hand tools, diagnostics equipment and tool storage sold mainly to automotive technicians via franchised trucks.

Momentum neutral 45
Mkt cap
$18.9B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
98%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$171M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
18.3×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+9.5 pp
WACC 8.4%
Hurdle
-3 pp
Req g minus delivered
Official | Implied
A- / A+
agencies · bond market
Next earnings
90 days
4 Feb 2027
Close · USD$367.22
1D+0.2%
1W+3.2%
1M+2.3%
3M-10.7%
6M-1.1%
YTD+8.0%
1Y+9.4%
ATR %2.2%
Beta0.54
52w lowhigh13.2% off high

What Snap-on does

Makes professional hand tools, diagnostics equipment and tool storage sold mainly to automotive technicians via franchised trucks.

Sells mostly through franchisee-run vans that visit garages regularly, selling to technicians on credit that Snap-on's own finance arm provides, so interest income from those loans adds to product sales. The van tools group is the core; separate units sell diagnostic equipment and software to garages and dealerships, and tools to industrial and aerospace buyers.

Products and services

  • Hand tools
  • Diagnostics & repair equipment
  • Tool storage
  • Franchisee financing

Customers

  • Auto repair technicians
  • Dealerships
  • Aviation/military/industrial customers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Tools & equipment
  • Professional hand/power tools

What could go right

  • Franchise van network expansion
  • Diagnostics/software attach

What could go wrong

  • Auto repair volume cyclicality
  • Slowing technician headcount growth

Moat: narrow (brand, distribution). Iconic brand and franchised mobile-van distribution build strong technician loyalty and switching costs.

Headquarters: Kenosha, Wisconsin, USA · Founded: 1920 · Employees: 13,000

Named competitors

Snap-on at a glance

Size Snap-on (SNA) is a United States Industrials company (Tools & Hardware) with a market value of $18.9B, the 509th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $367.22 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 1.1%, against +14.8% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 3rd lowest of 8 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 2.9% over the last twelve months (peer median +6.3%); the operating margin is 24.9% (peer median 15.1%).

Valuation It trades at 18.3× forward earnings against a peer median of 18.7× (4th cheapest of 8).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 3% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is -3 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 9.5 points above its cost of capital (8.4% WACC).

Credit Snap-on has 3 bonds outstanding ($1.20B), rated A- by the agencies and trading like A+ at a weighted spread of 78 bp.

Short interest Short interest is 7.2% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 4 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10011012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 117SNA 100
Six months, rebased to 100: Snap-on against the median of its 7 peers (local-currency closes).

Snap-on financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$5.27B$5.16B$5.11B$5.11B$4.84B
Revenue growth—+1%0%+5%—
Gross profit$2.73B$2.67B$2.65B$2.62B$2.45B
EBITDA$1.41B$1.43B$1.44B$1.41B$1.31B
Net income$1.01B$1.02B$1.04B$1.01B$912M
Free cash flow$1.07B$1.01B$1.13B$1.06B$591M
Capital expenditure$82.5M$76.0M$83.5M$95.0M$84.2M
Total debt$1.31B$1.29B$1.29B$1.28B$1.27B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Snap-on competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+20%+40%0%+20%SWKALLE06696586ASSA-BCDA002444SNA6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Snap-on is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+10%+20%+30%20×30×SWKALLE06696586ASSA-BCDA002444SNARevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Snap-on is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+10%+20%0%10%20%SWKALLE06696586ASSA-BCDA002444SNAGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Snap-on is the large dot.

Snap-on competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (SNA vs SWK vs VNT vs 0669.HK)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Snap-on SNA$18.9B-1%+3%25%18.3×2.7%
Stanley Black & Decker SWK$17.3B+43%0%10%18.3×6.8%
Vontier VNT$5.71B+40%+1%19%11.5×4.1%
Techtronic Ind 0669.HK$33.1B+14%+4%9%22.8×8.1%

How Snap-on compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Snap-on against its 7 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureSNAPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+2.3%+11.6%3rd lowest of 8
6-month return-1.1%+14.8%3rd lowest of 8
Distance from 52-week high-13.2%-7.9%3rd lowest of 8
Revenue growth (TTM)+2.9%+6.3%3rd lowest of 8
Operating margin24.9%15.1%2nd highest of 8
Forward P/E18.3×18.7×4th cheapest of 8
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)2.7%7.6%2nd least demanding of 8
Growth delivered (Del g)+5.5%+9.3%3rd lowest of 8
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-2.8 pp-1.2 pp3rd least demanding of 8
ROIC minus cost of capital+9.5 pp+3.5 pp3rd highest of 8
EV / EBITDA13.2×15.7×3rd cheapest of 6
Net debt / EBITDA-0.3×1.7×2nd least indebted of 6
Bond spread78 bp85 bptightest of 4

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Snap-on SNAUnited States$18.9B-1%+3%25%18.3×2.7%+5.5%
Stanley Black & Decker SWKUnited States$17.3B+43%0%10%18.3×6.8%+3.0%
Allegion ALLEUnited States$15.6B+39%+10%22%18.7×7.6%+8.4%
Techtronic Ind 0669.HKHong Kong$33.1B+14%+4%9%22.8×8.1%+9.3%
Makita 6586.TJapan$8.78B-9%+9%14%16.6×0.6%+5.0%
ASSA ABLOY ASSA-B.STSweden$44.8B+15%0%17%24.4×9.0%+11.7%
Codan CDA.AXAustralia$6.88B+41%+30%28%36.4×26.4%+14.9%
Hangzhou GreatStar Industrial 002444.SZChina$5.33B-13%+6%15%13.0×5.8%+11.5%

Snap-on bonds and credit

Snap-on has 3 bonds outstanding with $1.20B face value. The agencies rate it A-; its bonds trade like A+. Weighted yield 6.09%, a spread of 78 bp over government bonds.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Questions

Who are Snap-on's main competitors?
Named competitors: Stanley Black & Decker (Mac Tools) (SWK), Vontier (Matco Tools) (VNT), Robert Bosch (diagnostics) (private or unlisted), Klein Tools (private or unlisted), Techtronic Industries (0669.HK). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Stanley Black & Decker (SWK), Allegion (ALLE), Techtronic Ind (0669.HK), Makita (6586.T), ASSA ABLOY (ASSA-B.ST), Codan (CDA.AX).
Is Snap-on expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 18.3× against a peer median of 18.7×, 4th cheapest of 8 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 3% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +6%, so the hurdle is -3 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Snap-on stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -1.1% against +14.8% for the median peer; over one year +9.4%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.