Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › AMI.AX Aurelia Metals LimitedOpen in the cockpit ↗

Aurelia Metals LimitedAMI.AXCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Australia · AUD·Materials›Precious Metals

Australian base-metals and gold miner operating the Peak, Federation and Hera mines in the Cobar Basin, New South Wales.

≈ A small-cap US polymetallic minerMomentum strong 66
Mkt cap
$477M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
70%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$1.55M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
4.8×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+17.0 pp
WACC 11.5%
Hurdle
-9 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
110 days
24 Feb 2027
Close · AUDA$0.40
1D-3.6%
1W0.0%
1M-8.1%
3M+3.9%
6M+15.9%
YTD+60.0%
1Y+70.2%
ATR %7.0%
52w lowhigh24.5% off high

What Aurelia Metals does

Australian base-metals and gold miner operating the Peak, Federation and Hera mines in the Cobar Basin, New South Wales.

Sells metal concentrates to smelters and traders, which pay for the metal contained less charges, plus gold sold to refiners, so earnings follow gold, copper and zinc prices and the grade of ore mined. All producing mines are in one district, the Cobar Basin of New South Wales, and Great Cobar is being developed as a further mine.

In one line: A small-cap US polymetallic miner.

Products and services

  • Peak mine (gold, copper)
  • Federation mine (zinc, lead, gold)
  • Hera mine
  • Great Cobar development project

Customers

  • Base-metal smelters/traders
  • Gold refiners

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Materials
  • Base metals & gold mining
  • Underground mining:…

What could go right

  • Copper/zinc demand from electrification
  • Great Cobar production start

What could go wrong

  • Commodity price cyclicality
  • Underground mining cost/operational risk

Moat: none. Multi-mine but small-scale polymetallic miner with no pricing power over commodity outputs.

Headquarters: Sydney, Australia · Founded: 2003

Named competitors

Aurelia Metals at a glance

Size Aurelia Metals (AMI.AX) is an Australia Materials company (Precious Metals) with a market value of $477M, the 267th largest of 316 Australia companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at A$0.40 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 15.9%, against -20.4% for the median peer and +4.1% for the Australia market (cap-weighted) — 6th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 39.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +81.2%); the operating margin is 27.2% (peer median 12.5%).

Valuation It trades at 4.8× forward earnings against a peer median of 5.7× (3rd cheapest of 8).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +3%, so the hurdle is -9 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 17.0 points above its cost of capital (11.5% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 24 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

7510012515011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026AMI.AX 118Peer median 79
Six months, rebased to 100: Aurelia Metals against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Aurelia Metals financials

Reported figures in AUD; fiscal year ends 2026-06-30. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023
RevenueA$480MA$480MA$343MA$310MA$369M
Revenue growth—+40%+11%-16%—
Gross profitA$143MA$140MA$82.4MA$27.7M-A$34.1M
EBITDAA$193MA$194MA$111MA$81.5MA$54.7M
Net incomeA$82.7MA$82.7MA$48.9M-A$5.73M-A$52.2M
Free cash flowA$34.8MA$34.8MA$25.8MA$29.5MA$10.4M
Capital expenditureA$121MA$121MA$116MA$82.9MA$46.5M
Total debtn/aA$7.28MA$8.58MA$7.93MA$12.7M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Aurelia Metals competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%-10%0%HSTRTHXMEIAUCRMLGOROITRATXTAUASECTGONMGSLGRXLWIATCGIPXBTRFRSAMI.AX6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Aurelia Metals is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

+50%+100%+150%+200%2×4×6×THXGOROITRASEAMI.AXRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Aurelia Metals is the large dot.

Aurelia Metals competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (AMI.AX vs S32.AX vs 29M.AX vs SFR.AX)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Aurelia Metals AMI.AX$477M+16%+40%27%4.8×-5.8%
South32 S32.AX$13.7B-1%-4%15%12.7×6.3%
29Metals 29M.AXn/a-21%n/an/an/an/a
Sandfire Resources SFR.AX$6.20B-4%+32%32%13.3×9.2%
CMOC 603993.SS$41.0B-29%+32%20%8.7×-5.4%

How Aurelia Metals compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Aurelia Metals against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureAMI.AXPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-8.1%-8.6%11th highest of 21
6-month return+15.9%-20.4%6th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-24.5%-36.9%7th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+39.8%+81.2%3rd lowest of 7
Operating margin27.2%12.5%3rd highest of 9
Forward P/E4.8×5.7×3rd cheapest of 8
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-5.8%0.8%2nd least demanding of 4
Growth delivered (Del g)+2.9%n/a—
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-8.7 ppn/a—
ROIC minus cost of capital+17.0 pp-19.1 pp2nd highest of 17
EV / EBITDA2.9×4.2×3rd cheapest of 6
Net debt / EBITDA-0.7×-1.1×2nd most indebted of 7

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Aurelia Metals AMI.AXAustralia$477M+16%+40%27%4.8×-5.8%+2.9%
Heliostar Metals HSTR.TOCanada$475M+10%n/a22%8.3×15.3%n/a
Thor Explorations THX.VCanada$466M-26%+29%63%2.2×n/an/a
Meteoric Resources MEI.AXAustralia$464M+12%n/an/an/an/an/a
Ausgold AUC.AXAustralia$495M+42%n/an/an/an/an/a
Rusoro Mining RML.VCanada$457M-5%n/an/an/an/an/a
Goldgroup Mining GORO.VCanada$500M-21%+215%3%5.7×n/an/a
Integra Resources ITR.VCanada$453M-20%+71%26%5.7×0.8%+70.9%
ATEX Resources ATX.TOCanada$443M-45%n/an/an/an/an/a
Thesis Gold & Silver TAU.VCanada$516M-31%n/an/an/an/an/a
Asante Gold ASE.VCanada$439M-39%+28%-22%1.4×n/an/a
Contango Silver & Gold CTGOUnited States$520M-43%n/an/a5.6×n/an/a
New Murchison Gold NMG.AXAustralia$433M+19%+1,594,866%67%n/a-19.0%n/a
San Lorenzo Gold SLG.VCanada$431M+101%n/an/an/an/an/a
Rox Resources RXL.AXAustralia$532M+13%n/an/an/an/an/a
WIA Gold WIA.AXAustralia$533M-22%n/an/an/an/an/a
Turaco Gold TCG.AXAustralia$540M+29%n/an/an/an/an/a
IperionX IPXUnited States$540M-66%n/an/an/an/an/a
Brightstar Resources BTR.AXAustralia$542M+68%+91%-116%n/an/an/a
Goldsky Resources GSKR.VCanada$543M-28%n/an/an/an/an/a
Forrestania Resources FRS.AXAustralia$547M-33%n/a-4,833%8.9×n/an/a

Questions

Who are Aurelia Metals's main competitors?
Named competitors: South32 (S32.AX), 29Metals (29M.AX), Sandfire Resources (SFR.AX), CMOC Group (Northparkes) (603993.SS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Heliostar Metals (HSTR.TO), Thor Explorations (THX.V), Meteoric Resources (MEI.AX), Ausgold (AUC.AX), Rusoro Mining (RML.V), Goldgroup Mining (GORO.V).
Is Aurelia Metals expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 4.8× against a peer median of 5.7×, 3rd cheapest of 8 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -6% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +3%, so the hurdle is -9 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Aurelia Metals stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +15.9% against -20.4% for the median peer; over one year +70.2%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.