Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 9081.T Kanagawa Chuo Kotsu Co., Ltd.Open in the cockpit ↗

Kanagawa Chuo Kotsu Co., Ltd.9081.TCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Japan · JPY·Consumer Discretionary›Other Consumer Services
Momentum strong 77
Mkt cap
$298M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
43%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$350,837
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-1.3 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
94 days
8 Feb 2027
Close · JPY¥3,835
1D-3.3%
1W+5.5%
1M+3.8%
3M+0.1%
6M+19.1%
YTD+2.3%
1Y+5.1%
ATR %2.5%
52w lowhigh7.0% off high

What Kanagawa Chuo Kotsu does

Employees: 6,432

Kanagawa Chuo Kotsu at a glance

Size Kanagawa Chuo Kotsu (9081.T) is a Japan Consumer Discretionary company (Other Consumer Services) with a market value of $298M, the 1361st largest of 1,379 Japan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at ¥3,835 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 19.1%, against -12.1% for the median peer and +1.8% for the Japan market (cap-weighted) — 5th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 5.4% over the last twelve months (peer median +5.6%); the operating margin is 6.0% (peer median 16.0%).

Valuation It trades at 0.9× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 2.3× (5th cheapest of 20).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.3 points below its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 8 Feb 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20269081.T 117Peer median 87
Six months, rebased to 100: Kanagawa Chuo Kotsu against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Kanagawa Chuo Kotsu financials

Reported figures in JPY; fiscal year ends 2026-03-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue¥129B¥127B¥118B¥117B¥104B
Revenue growth—+7%+1%+13%—
Gross profit¥22.6B¥20.3B¥20.6B¥20.2B¥16.8B
EBITDA¥14.6B¥13.2B¥13.0B¥12.8B¥10.2B
Net income¥4.06B¥3.62B¥5.08B¥3.26B¥1.15B
Free cash flown/a-¥5.05B-¥5.04B¥3.56B-¥3.04B
Capital expendituren/a¥14.2B¥13.5B¥6.11B¥7.93B
Total debt¥68.5B¥72.3B¥61.9B¥56.3B¥59.1B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Kanagawa Chuo Kotsu competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%-20%-10%0%+10%0032657420462047183551OTB471497266031360021598462688129273134969733300247000802MHRIL9081.T6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Kanagawa Chuo Kotsu is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+200%+400%0×5×10×15×657420462047183551OTB97266031366007490008029081.TRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Kanagawa Chuo Kotsu is the large dot.

Kanagawa Chuo Kotsu competitors and peer comparison

How Kanagawa Chuo Kotsu compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Kanagawa Chuo Kotsu against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure9081.TPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+3.8%-4.3%4th highest of 21
6-month return+19.1%-12.1%5th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-7.0%-26.5%2nd highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+5.4%+5.6%11th highest of 21
Operating margin6.0%16.0%6th lowest of 21
EV / Sales0.9×2.3×5th cheapest of 20
ROIC minus cost of capital-1.3 pp+7.5 pp4th lowest of 19
EV / EBITDA8.1×7.6×6th most expensive of 13
Net debt / EBITDA4.4×-2.1×2nd most indebted of 15

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Kanagawa Chuo Kotsu 9081.TJapan$298M+19%+5%6%0.9×n/an/a
Cross-Harbour (Holdings) 0032.HKHong Kong$308M-22%-5%31%n/an/an/a
Convano 6574.TJapan$311M-13%+494%36%2.3×7.6%+57.2%
Global Tax Free 204620.KSSouth Korea$285M-8%+42%19%1.6×-16.6%+72.2%
Waseda Academy 4718.TJapan$314M+36%+8%12%1.0×-12.9%+8.1%
Shih-her Technologies 3551.TWOTaiwan$283M-28%+20%19%2.3×1.4%+7.7%
On The Beach OTB.LUnited Kingdom$316M+26%-2%16%0.5×-20.0%+29.2%
Riso Kyoiku 4714.TJapan$317M+52%+4%10%1.2×-6.1%+6.3%
KNT-CT 9726.TJapan$331M-2%+6%2%0.1×-18.4%+27.6%
Jiangsu Tianmu Lake Tourism 603136.SSChina$335M-25%-12%17%3.9×-0.7%+6.3%
Jp Holdings Inc 2749.TJapan$337M-8%+4%16%0.8×-19.0%+5.3%
Wuhan Sante Cableways 002159.SZChina$356M-18%-3%37%3.5×-8.9%+9.6%
Power Wind Health Industry 8462.TWTaiwan$366M+2%+20%17%2.6×-4.4%+10.5%
Donglai Coating Technology (Shanghai) 688129.SSChina$370M-30%+7%13%2.8×n/an/a
Lion Travel Service 2731.TWTaiwan$382M-15%+5%5%0.2×-20.4%+35.6%
Tibet Tourism 600749.SSChina$384M-29%-7%-12%11.0×49.8%+8.1%
Azoom 3496.TJapan$385M+21%+26%19%3.5×-1.0%+28.7%
Nagase Brothers 9733.TJapan$404M-5%+8%9%1.3×-8.3%+7.0%
Youngy Health 300247.SZChina$409M-21%+2%19%2.8×5.7%+12.8%
Beijing Jingxi Culture and Tourism 000802.SZChina$409M-12%-60%-62%15.4×10.6%-4.8%
Mahindra Holidays & Resorts India MHRIL.NSIndia$422M-18%+7%6%2.4×30.5%+12.0%

Questions

Which companies are Kanagawa Chuo Kotsu's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: Cross-Harbour (Holdings) (0032.HK), Convano (6574.T), Global Tax Free (204620.KS), Waseda Academy (4718.T), Shih-her Technologies (3551.TWO), On The Beach (OTB.L), Riso Kyoiku (4714.T), KNT-CT (9726.T).
Is Kanagawa Chuo Kotsu expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 0.9× against a peer median of 2.3×, 5th cheapest of 20 in its peer set.
How has Kanagawa Chuo Kotsu stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +19.1% against -12.1% for the median peer; over one year +5.1%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.