Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 688301.SS iRay Technology Company Limited Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

iRay Technology Company Limited Class A688301.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Health Care›Medical Specialties

Chinese maker of digital X-ray flat-panel detectors used in medical imaging, dental, veterinary and industrial inspection.

≈ A Chinese Varex Imaging (X-ray detector maker)Momentum strong 63
Mkt cap
$3.54B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
66%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$61.0M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
27.5×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
-1.2 pp
WACC 10.3%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
126 days
12 Mar 2027
Close · CNYCN¥75.27
1D-5.3%
1W+4.8%
1M-6.4%
3M-9.1%
6M-8.0%
YTD+4.2%
1Y-8.3%
ATR %6.1%
52w lowhigh50.9% off high

What iRay Technology does

Chinese maker of digital X-ray flat-panel detectors used in medical imaging, dental, veterinary and industrial inspection.

Makes the flat-panel detector inside an X-ray machine and sells it to imaging-equipment makers, who design it into their products, so a qualified model is bought repeatedly over the machine's life. Dental, veterinary and industrial inspection uses broaden the base beyond hospital radiology.

In one line: A Chinese Varex Imaging (X-ray detector maker).

Products and services

  • Medical X-ray detectors
  • Dental imaging detectors
  • Industrial/security detectors

Customers

  • Medical imaging OEMs
  • Dental equipment makers
  • Industrial NDT companies

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Health Care
  • Medical imaging components
  • Digital X-ray flat-panel detectors

What could go right

  • Medical imaging equipment upgrade cycles
  • Industrial inspection detector demand

What could go wrong

  • OEM customer concentration
  • Panel price competition

Moat: narrow (IP / patents, process know-how). Detector manufacturing know-how and OEM qualification are not easily replicated.

Headquarters: Shanghai, China · Employees: 2,292

Named competitors

iRay Technology at a glance

Size iRay Technology (688301.SS) is a China Health Care company (Medical Specialties) with a market value of $3.54B, the 730th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥75.27 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 8.0%, against +12.0% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 7th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 58.5% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.5%); the operating margin is 23.9% (peer median 11.0%).

Valuation It trades at 27.5× forward earnings against a peer median of 22.1× (7th most expensive of 18).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 1.2 points below its cost of capital (10.3% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 12 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10015011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 113688301.SS 92
Six months, rebased to 100: iRay Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

iRay Technology financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥3.20BCN¥2.24BCN¥1.83BCN¥1.86BCN¥1.54B
Revenue growth—+23%-2%+21%—
Gross profitCN¥1.77BCN¥1.10BCN¥888MCN¥1.03BCN¥861M
EBITDAn/aCN¥787MCN¥488MCN¥676MCN¥532M
Net incomeCN¥752MCN¥650MCN¥465MCN¥607MCN¥641M
Free cash flow-CN¥762M-CN¥384M-CN¥1.08B-CN¥1.51B-CN¥400M
Capital expenditureCN¥1.61BCN¥1.69BCN¥1.44BCN¥1.85BCN¥717M
Total debtCN¥3.26BCN¥4.32BCN¥3.60BCN¥2.14BCN¥1.48B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

iRay Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

0%+50%+100%+150%-20%0%+20%AFX002432603014AMBU-B3000036881146036581SXPSTVNOBCK6033014203CELCPLSENVSTTECNTMDXFIECDNAAXGN688301.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. iRay Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-25%0%+25%+50%20×40×60×80×AFX002432603014AMBU-B603658STVNOBCK6033014203TECNTMDXCDNAAXGN688301.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. iRay Technology is the large dot.

iRay Technology competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (688301.SS vs VREX vs TDY vs 6965.T)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
iRay Technology 688301.SS$3.54B-8%+58%24%27.5×n/a
Varex Imaging VREX$783M-10%+5%8%20.3×n/a
Teledyne Technologies TDY$28.5B0%+8%20%22.9×15.5%
Hamamatsu Photonics K.K 6965.T$3.69B-7%+10%9%30.9×27.8%

How iRay Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

iRay Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure688301.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-6.4%+10.4%7th lowest of 21
6-month return-8.0%+12.0%7th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-50.9%-22.0%2nd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+58.5%+4.5%highest of 19
Operating margin23.9%11.0%2nd highest of 19
Forward P/E27.5×22.1×7th most expensive of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital-1.2 pp-1.6 pp9th highest of 18

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
iRay Technology 688301.SSChina$3.54B-8%+58%24%27.5×n/an/a
Carl Zeiss Meditec AFX.DEGermany$3.51B+40%0%8%26.8×13.7%+10.8%
Andon Health 002432.SZChina$3.60B-29%-30%-26%15.0×-7.7%-7.4%
Shandong Weigao Blood Purification Products 603014.SSChina$3.63B-3%+4%n/a20.4×-1.2%+8.1%
Ambu A/S AMBU-B.CODenmark$3.42B+40%+5%11%28.1×12.6%+11.1%
Lepu Medical Technology (Beijing) 300003.SZChina$3.42B-12%-1%13%26.3×9.6%-4.2%
MGI Tech 688114.SSChina$3.42B+9%+2%-7%n/a46.5%-0.1%
Autobio Diagnostics 603658.SSChina$3.41B+19%+3%25%20.6×-0.3%+7.2%
SCHOTT Pharma AG & Co. KGaA 1SXP.DEGermany$3.67B+31%+4%15%22.1×11.7%+11.0%
Stevanato STVNUnited States$3.70B-26%+12%18%19.3×10.6%+12.1%
Ottobock SE & Co. KGaA OBCK.DEGermany$3.36B-25%+5%15%15.4×3.5%+8.0%
Zhende Medical 603301.SSChina$3.33B-8%+8%7%43.5×23.2%-16.1%
Sumitomo Bakelite 4203.TJapan$3.31B+15%+15%13%14.9×6.8%+8.9%
Celcuity CELCUnited States$3.27B-49%n/an/an/an/an/a
Pulse Biosciences PLSEUnited States$3.87B+179%n/a-7,008%n/an/an/a
Envista NVSTUnited States$4.04B+4%+12%11%15.6×6.8%+7.1%
Tecan TECN.SWSwitzerland$4.05B+91%-4%1%40.1×46.9%+3.8%
TransMedics TMDXUnited States$3.06B+30%+26%12%48.5×35.6%+88.2%
Fielmann FIE.DEGermany$4.12B+3%+3%14%17.8×-5.3%+11.3%
CareDx CDNAUnited States$4.13B+260%+39%1%53.2×n/an/a
Axogen AXGNUnited States$2.99B+19%+24%-5%76.5×48.8%+14.9%

Questions

Who are iRay Technology's main competitors?
Named competitors: Varex Imaging (VREX), Canon Medical (private or unlisted), Trixell (private) (private or unlisted), Vieworks (private or unlisted), Detection Technology (private or unlisted), Teledyne Technologies (TDY). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Carl Zeiss Meditec (AFX.DE), Andon Health (002432.SZ), Shandong Weigao Blood Purification Products (603014.SS), Ambu A/S (AMBU-B.CO), Lepu Medical Technology (Beijing) (300003.SZ), MGI Tech (688114.SS).
Is iRay Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 27.5× against a peer median of 22.1×, 7th most expensive of 18 in its peer set.
How has iRay Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -8.0% against +12.0% for the median peer; over one year -8.3%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.