Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 6651.HK Beijing 51WORLD Digital Twin Technology Co., Ltd. Class HOpen in the cockpit ↗

Beijing 51WORLD Digital Twin Technology Co., Ltd. Class H6651.HKCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Hong Kong · HKD·Information Technology›Packaged Software

Chinese maker of digital-twin simulation software used for autonomous-driving testing, smart cities and industrial simulation.

≈ China's answer to a narrower-scope NVIDIA OmniverseMomentum neutral 48
Mkt cap
$2.91B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
55%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$50.4M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-50.2 pp
WACC 15.7%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
117 days
3 Mar 2027
Close · HKDHK$54.45
1D-5.6%
1W+2.5%
1M-6.0%
3M-21.6%
6M-1.0%
YTD+32.8%
1Yn/a
ATR %11.3%
52w lowhigh63.0% off high

What Beijing 51WORLD Digital Twin Technology does

Chinese maker of digital-twin simulation software used for autonomous-driving testing, smart cities and industrial simulation.

In one line: China's answer to a narrower-scope NVIDIA Omniverse.

Products and services

  • Autonomous-driving simulation software
  • Smart city/urban digital twins
  • Industrial digital twin platforms

Customers

  • Automakers/AV developers
  • Government/smart-city planners
  • Industrial enterprises

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Information Technology
  • Simulation software
  • Digital twin platforms

What could go right

  • Autonomous-vehicle testing/simulation demand growth
  • Smart city digitalization spending

What could go wrong

  • Reliance on AV industry capex cycle
  • Competitive simulation-software landscape

Moat: narrow (IP / patents, process know-how). Specialized 3D simulation and digital-twin technology used in autonomous-vehicle testing and smart-city projects.

Headquarters: Beijing, China · Founded: 2018 · Employees: 350

Named competitors

Beijing 51WORLD Digital Twin Technology at a glance

Size Beijing 51WORLD Digital Twin Technology (6651.HK) is a Hong Kong Information Technology company (Packaged Software) with a market value of $2.91B, the 342nd largest of 891 Hong Kong companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at HK$54.45 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 1.0%, against -5.0% for the median peer and -13.4% for the Hong Kong market (cap-weighted) — 9th highest of 20 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 38.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +9.8%); the operating margin is -38.5% (peer median 7.9%).

Valuation It trades at 48.5× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 4.0× (most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 50.2 points below its cost of capital (15.7% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 3 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10020011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 20266651.HK 102Peer median 96
Six months, rebased to 100: Beijing 51WORLD Digital Twin Technology against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Beijing 51WORLD Digital Twin Technology financials

Reported figures in HKD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueHK$463MHK$377MHK$312MHK$283MHK$198M
Revenue growth—+21%+10%+43%—
Gross profitHK$153MHK$113MHK$155MHK$154MHK$128M
EBITDA-HK$162M-HK$164M-HK$70.3M-HK$62.9M-HK$140M
Net income-HK$176M-HK$197M-HK$85.8M-HK$94.6M-HK$221M
Free cash flow-HK$132M-HK$118M-HK$141M-HK$146M-HK$123M
Capital expenditureHK$14.7MHK$2.06MHK$41.8MHK$3.76MHK$3.05M
Total debtn/aHK$337MHK$185MHK$173MHK$164M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Beijing 51WORLD Digital Twin Technology competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-50%0%+50%+100%-20%0%+20%SPSCTDC688615TATATECH603171002153002065VERX2400VIA001339CLBT600100FRSHSINCHALRMBLSH6651.HK6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Beijing 51WORLD Digital Twin Technology is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+20%+40%0×20×40×SPSCTDC688615TATATECH603171002153002065300085VERX2400LFTOVIA001339CLBT600100SINCHBLSH6651.HKRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Beijing 51WORLD Digital Twin Technology is the large dot.

Beijing 51WORLD Digital Twin Technology competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (6651.HK vs NVDA vs U vs SIE.DE)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
Beijing 51WORLD Digital Twin Technology 6651.HK$2.91B-1%+39%-38%48.5×n/a
Nvidia NVDA$4.50T-13%+83%65%14.7×26.3%
Unity Software U$22.7B+83%+14%-14%11.3×33.5%
Siemens SIE.DE$225B-4%+4%13%3.0×18.3%
Dassault Systemes DSY.PA$39.0B+32%0%26%5.3×8.3%
Bentley Systems BSY$13.5B+36%+13%24%9.1×22.8%
Beijing Supermap Software 300036.SZ$744M-33%-24%-21%3.4×30.5%

How Beijing 51WORLD Digital Twin Technology compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Beijing 51WORLD Digital Twin Technology against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure6651.HKPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-6.0%+3.1%4th lowest of 21
6-month return-1.0%-5.0%9th highest of 20
Distance from 52-week high-63.0%-39.4%lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+38.8%+9.8%2nd highest of 21
Operating margin-38.5%7.9%lowest of 21
EV / Sales48.5×4.0×most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-50.2 pp-0.2 pplowest of 19

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Beijing 51WORLD Digital Twin Technology 6651.HKHong Kong$2.91B-1%+39%-38%48.5×n/an/a
SPS Commerce SPSCUnited States$2.90B+45%+7%17%3.5×7.3%+19.2%
Teradata TDCUnited States$2.96B+1%+1%8%1.6×-5.4%-2.0%
Intsig Information 688615.SSChina$2.96B-26%+24%22%7.8×12.6%+22.1%
Tata Technologies TATATECH.NSIndia$2.86B+6%+22%13%4.3×28.3%+18.3%
Servyou Software 603171.SSChina$2.84B-16%+6%5%8.4×40.3%+5.9%
Beijing Shiji Information Technology 002153.SZChina$3.02B-27%-4%-3%6.3×n/an/a
DHC Software 002065.SZChina$3.04B-23%-4%3%2.0×14.8%+7.1%
Shenzhen Infogem Technologies 300085.SZChina$3.06B-23%+2%-11%26.4×n/an/a
Vertex VERXUnited States$2.77B+14%+11%1%3.7×57.9%+14.8%
XD, Inc. 2400.HKHong Kong$2.77B-28%+6%26%2.6×3.0%+14.3%
Liftoff Mobile LFTOUnited States$3.07Bn/a+35%36%5.2×-7.3%+35.5%
Via Transportation VIAUnited States$3.07B+118%+29%-17%5.6×n/an/a
JWIPC Technology 001339.SZChina$2.72B-19%+41%21%4.3×n/an/a
Cellebrite DI CLBTUnited States$3.13B-2%+18%11%5.3×22.8%+19.5%
Tsinghua Tongfang 600100.SSChina$3.15B-22%-11%-2%2.3×30.2%-10.3%
Freshworks FRSHUnited States$3.18B+37%+15%8%2.7×12.9%+27.4%
Wix.com WIXUnited States$3.18B-5%+14%-3%2.0×-4.4%+15.2%
Sinch SINCH.STSweden$3.19B+13%-6%4%1.4×23.8%+27.5%
Alarm.com ALRMUnited States$3.19B+37%+9%13%3.1×10.9%+10.3%
Bullish BLSHUnited States$3.20B-51%+34%18%9.7×32.3%+14.4%

Questions

Who are Beijing 51WORLD Digital Twin Technology's main competitors?
Named competitors: NVIDIA (Omniverse) (NVDA), Unity Technologies (U), Siemens (SIE.DE), Dassault Systemes (DSY.PA), Bentley Systems (BSY), Beijing SuperMap Software (300036.SZ). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes SPS Commerce (SPSC), Teradata (TDC), Intsig Information (688615.SS), Tata Technologies (TATATECH.NS), Servyou Software (603171.SS), Beijing Shiji Information Technology (002153.SZ).
Is Beijing 51WORLD Digital Twin Technology expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 48.5× against a peer median of 4.0×, most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has Beijing 51WORLD Digital Twin Technology stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -1.0% against -5.0% for the median peer.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.