Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › BSY Bentley Systems, Incorporated Class BOpen in the cockpit ↗

Bentley Systems, Incorporated Class BBSYCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

United States · USD·Information Technology›Information Technology Services

Software for designing, building and operating infrastructure — roads, rail, water, utilities and plants.

≈ An infrastructure-focused AutodeskMomentum leader 95
Mkt cap
$13.5B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
53%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$128M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
31.4×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+3.9 pp
WACC 9.4%
Hurdle
+9 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
116 days
2 Mar 2027
Close · USD$44.65
1D-0.7%
1W+9.2%
1M+28.2%
3M+26.4%
6M+36.3%
YTD+17.0%
1Y-7.9%
ATR %3.7%
Beta0.31
52w lowhigh7.7% off high

What Bentley Systems does

Software for designing, building and operating infrastructure — roads, rail, water, utilities and plants.

Customers pay yearly subscriptions, increasingly through an enterprise program billed partly by how much software they actually use, so revenue grows as firms expand use. The Bentley family holds the Class A shares that control the vote; the Class B shares traded here carry less voting power. The 2021 purchase of Seequent extended it into geoscience.

In one line: An infrastructure-focused Autodesk.

Products and services

  • MicroStation
  • OpenRoads/OpenRail
  • Digital twins (iTwin)
  • Bentley Infrastructure Cloud
  • Seequent (geoscience)

Customers

  • Civil engineering firms
  • Utilities
  • Government/transportation agencies
  • Construction contractors

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Engineering software
  • Infrastructure/civil design
  • BIM & digital twins

What could go right

  • Global infrastructure/grid spending
  • Cloud & subscription mix shift

What could go wrong

  • Government budget cycles
  • Competition from Autodesk in adjacent CAD

Moat: narrow (switching costs, installed base, IP / patents). Engineers train on and standardize around its CAD formats; switching mid-project is costly.

Headquarters: Exton, Pennsylvania, US · Founded: 1984 · Employees: 5,800

Named competitors

Bentley Systems at a glance

Size Bentley Systems (BSY) is a United States Information Technology company (Information Technology Services) with a market value of $13.5B, the 650th largest of 3,117 United States companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at $44.65 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares gained 36.3%, against +26.8% for the median peer and -1.1% for the United States market (cap-weighted) — 8th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 12.8% over the last twelve months (peer median +12.0%); the operating margin is 24.4% (peer median 10.9%).

Valuation It trades at 31.4× forward earnings against a peer median of 24.4× (7th most expensive of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 23% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +13%, so the hurdle is +9 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 3.9 points above its cost of capital (9.4% WACC).

Backlog Backlog (remaining performance obligations) was $257M at 30 Sep 2026, up 2% on a year earlier — 0.2 years of trailing revenue. Backlog detail →

Credit Bentley Systems has 1 bond outstanding ($575M).

Short interest Short interest is 5.5% of the free float (15 Oct 2026).

Next results Next results expected around 2 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

10012014011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026BSY 137Peer median 126
Six months, rebased to 100: Bentley Systems against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Bentley Systems financials

Reported figures in USD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
Revenue$1.60B$1.50B$1.35B$1.23B$1.10B
Revenue growth—+11%+10%+12%—
Gross profit$1.28B$1.19B$1.06B$924M$821M
EBITDA$452M$430M$374M$302M$285M
Net income$290M$278M$235M$327M$175M
Free cash flow$498M$520M$421M$392M$256M
Capital expenditure$24.4M$18.3M$14.0M$25.0M$18.5M
Total debt$1.27B$1.28B$1.43B$1.57B$1.82B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Bentley Systems competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%+60%-20%0%+20%CACIGWRE002230018260301165IDR4684GIB-APERSISTENTCOFORGETECHMCDW4307WIPRO4768RBRKEPAMCRDOCAPBSY6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Bentley Systems is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

+10%+20%+30%+40%50×100×CACIGWRE002230018260301165IDR4684GIB-APERSISTENTCOFORGETECHMCDW4307WIPRORBRKAPPFCRDOCAPBSYRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Bentley Systems is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+25%+50%+75%0%50%CACIGWRE018260IDRGIB-APERSISTENTCOFORGETECHMCDWEPAMAPPFCRDOCAPBSYGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Bentley Systems is the large dot.

Bentley Systems competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (BSY vs ADSK vs TRMB vs HEXA-B.ST)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Bentley Systems BSY$13.5B+36%+13%24%31.4×22.8%
Autodesk ADSK$54.7B+7%+19%23%20.1×18.1%
Trimble TRMB$12.6B-11%+7%18%13.6×15.3%
Hexagon HEXA-B.ST$29.4B+14%-20%-14%30.0×9.1%
Nemetschek NEM.DE$8.39B+10%+13%26%29.9×11.1%
Dassault Systemes DSY.PA$39.0B+32%0%26%19.2×8.3%

How Bentley Systems compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Bentley Systems against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
MeasureBSYPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return+28.2%+11.1%2nd highest of 21
6-month return+36.3%+26.8%8th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-7.7%-15.6%4th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+12.8%+12.0%11th highest of 21
Operating margin24.4%10.9%3rd highest of 21
Forward P/E31.4×24.4×7th most expensive of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)22.8%9.2%6th most demanding of 19
Growth delivered (Del g)+13.4%+9.8%8th highest of 19
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)+9.4 pp-3.9 pp3rd most demanding of 19
ROIC minus cost of capital+3.9 pp+6.9 pp9th lowest of 20
EV / EBITDA32.3×15.2×4th most expensive of 16
Net debt / EBITDA2.5×-0.6×2nd most indebted of 16

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Bentley Systems BSYUnited States$13.5B+36%+13%24%31.4×22.8%+13.4%
CACI International CACIUnited States$13.6B+27%+10%10%17.6×7.3%+9.6%
Guidewire Software GWREUnited States$13.3B+17%+23%10%38.5×39.4%+14.7%
iflytek 002230.SZChina$13.2B-20%+11%-4%106.3×n/an/a
Samsung Sds 018260.KSSouth Korea$12.4B+31%+2%5%24.9×13.0%+4.8%
Ruijie Networks 301165.SZChina$11.7B+6%+30%5%48.3×n/an/a
Indra Sistemas IDR.MCSpain$11.2B+12%+28%10%19.7×4.2%+12.4%
OBIC 4684.TJapan$16.6B+46%+13%67%30.3×4.6%+10.0%
CGI GIB-A.TOCanada$17.2B+27%+6%17%12.2×-12.0%+5.5%
Persistent Systems PERSISTENT.NSIndia$10.6B+21%+27%16%43.9×37.4%+28.6%
Coforge COFORGE.NSIndia$9.71B+62%+41%16%35.2×34.6%+28.6%
Tech Mahindra TECHM.NSIndia$19.0B+26%+14%14%23.9×20.3%+8.5%
CDW CDWUnited States$19.6B+51%+11%7%12.9×2.6%+4.0%
Nomura Research Institute 4307.TJapan$20.2B+40%+8%19%26.4×0.7%+8.2%
Wipro WIPRO.NSIndia$20.7B0%+8%16%14.9×9.0%+8.4%
Otsuka 4768.TJapan$8.63B+24%+9%7%20.1×-5.6%+9.6%
Rubrik RBRKUnited States$21.9B+70%+42%-18%215.0×36.2%+27.7%
EPAM Systems EPAMUnited States$8.22B+61%+11%10%11.3×9.4%+15.5%
AppFolio APPFUnited States$8.18B+39%+20%19%28.9×18.5%+25.1%
Credo Technology CRDOUnited States$22.7B-36%+165%32%16.5×47.4%+86.8%
Capgemini CAP.PAFrance$24.1B+31%+6%11%10.4×-0.1%+7.2%

Bentley Systems bonds and credit

Bentley Systems has 1 bond outstanding with $575M face value.

Every bond, yield and spread in the cockpit →

Bentley Systems backlog

Bentley Systems reported $257M of remaining performance obligations at 30 Sep 2026, up 2% from a year earlier and down 8% from the previous quarter. That is 0.2 years of trailing revenue already under contract. Book-to-bill last quarter: 0.94.

Questions

Who are Bentley Systems's main competitors?
Named competitors: Autodesk (ADSK), Trimble (TRMB), Hexagon AB (HEXA-B.ST), Nemetschek (NEM.DE), Dassault Systemes (DSY.PA). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes CACI International (CACI), Guidewire Software (GWRE), iflytek (002230.SZ), Samsung Sds (018260.KS), Ruijie Networks (301165.SZ), Indra Sistemas (IDR.MC).
Is Bentley Systems expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 31.4× against a peer median of 24.4×, 7th most expensive of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about 23% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is +13%, so the hurdle is +9 pp: the price needs faster growth than the company has been delivering — of companies that just grew 25–50% a year, 93.8% slowed down over the next four years.
How has Bentley Systems stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned +36.3% against +26.8% for the median peer; over one year -7.9%.
What is Bentley Systems's backlog?
Bentley Systems's remaining performance obligations (contracted revenue not yet recognised) were $257M at 30 Sep 2026, +2% on a year earlier.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.