Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 6257.TW Sigurd Microelectronics Corp.Open in the cockpit ↗

Sigurd Microelectronics Corp.6257.TWCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

Taiwan · TWD·Industrials›Miscellaneous Commercial Services

Taiwan OSAT (outsourced assembly & test) house specializing in packaging and testing discrete and power semiconductors.

≈ A discrete-focused, Taiwan-sized Amkor TechnologyMomentum weak 22
Mkt cap
$2.33B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
94%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$94.7M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
14.0×
forward earnings
ROIC−WACC
+4.8 pp
WACC 6.5%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Next earnings
118 days
4 Mar 2027
Close · TWDNT$159.50
1D-7.8%
1W-24.1%
1M-38.6%
3M-20.1%
6M-19.0%
YTD+36.9%
1Y+69.0%
ATR %9.5%
52w lowhigh45.7% off high

What Sigurd Microelectronics does

Taiwan OSAT (outsourced assembly & test) house specializing in packaging and testing discrete and power semiconductors.

Paid per unit packaged or tested under service contracts with a few large chip customers, so factory utilisation and equipment spending determine results. Its processes are qualified customer by customer for power and discrete devices, which makes switching slow once a product is running.

In one line: A discrete-focused, Taiwan-sized Amkor Technology.

Products and services

  • IC packaging
  • IC testing
  • Discrete semiconductor assembly

Customers

  • Fabless/IDM discrete & power semiconductor makers

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Semiconductors
  • Back-end assembly & test
  • Discrete/power IC packaging

What could go right

  • Power semiconductor demand from EVs and industrial

What could go wrong

  • Cyclical semiconductor demand
  • OSAT pricing competition

Moat: narrow (process know-how, customer qualification). Assembly/test processes are qualified per customer product line, creating switching friction once validated.

Headquarters: Hsinchu, Taiwan

Named competitors

Sigurd Microelectronics at a glance

Size Sigurd Microelectronics (6257.TW) is a Taiwan Industrials company (Miscellaneous Commercial Services) with a market value of $2.33B, the 150th largest of 687 Taiwan companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at NT$159.50 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 19.0%, against +3.1% for the median peer and -3.4% for the Taiwan market (cap-weighted) — 4th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 12.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +12.7%); the operating margin is 21.7% (peer median 14.7%).

Valuation It trades at 14.0× forward earnings against a peer median of 21.8× (6th cheapest of 18).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 4.8 points above its cost of capital (6.5% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 4 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

8010012014011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 1036257.TW 78
Six months, rebased to 100: Sigurd Microelectronics against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Sigurd Microelectronics financials

Reported figures in TWD; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueNT$21.3BNT$19.6BNT$18.2BNT$15.5BNT$18.7B
Revenue growth—+8%+18%-17%—
Gross profitNT$6.58BNT$5.72BNT$4.76BNT$3.58BNT$5.53B
EBITDANT$8.71BNT$8.01BNT$7.34BNT$6.54BNT$8.38B
Net incomeNT$4.09BNT$2.95BNT$2.77BNT$1.74BNT$3.03B
Free cash flow-NT$1.75BNT$1.09BNT$3.26BNT$4.01BNT$4.13B
Capital expenditureNT$9.26BNT$5.39BNT$3.83BNT$2.34BNT$4.13B
Total debtNT$14.2BNT$13.7BNT$11.9BNT$13.6BNT$13.9B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Sigurd Microelectronics competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-40%-20%0%+20%+40%-40%-20%0%+20%3264688690VVXTIC688596012750688796KWS6019654194300140FSLSAGILITY001267IWGHURNPLX68858277996888136257.TW6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Sigurd Microelectronics is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

0%+50%+100%25×50×75×3264688690VVX688596012750688796KWS6019654194SAGILITY001267HURNPLX6885826257.TWRevenue growth (TTM) →Forward P/E →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Sigurd Microelectronics is the large dot.

Sigurd Microelectronics competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (6257.TW vs 3711.TW vs 6239.TW vs 8150.TW)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq g
Sigurd Microelectronics 6257.TW$2.33B-19%+12%22%14.0×n/a
Ase Technology 3711.TW$70.4B+2%+25%11%17.3×n/a
Powertech Technology 6239.TW$4.61B-11%+24%13%13.2×n/a
ChipMOS Technologies 8150.TW$1.49B-17%+19%8%12.2×n/a
Ardentec 3264.TWO$2.36B-30%+32%30%12.3×5.2%

How Sigurd Microelectronics compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Sigurd Microelectronics against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure6257.TWPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-38.6%-0.4%lowest of 21
6-month return-19.0%+3.1%4th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-45.7%-25.7%5th lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+12.3%+12.7%9th lowest of 19
Operating margin21.7%14.7%8th highest of 20
Forward P/E14.0×21.8×6th cheapest of 18
ROIC minus cost of capital+4.8 pp+0.5 pp4th highest of 18
EV / EBITDA9.4×12.2×3rd cheapest of 11
Net debt / EBITDA0.2×0.8×5th least indebted of 11

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginForward P/EReq gDelivered g
Sigurd Microelectronics 6257.TWTaiwan$2.33B-19%+12%22%14.0×n/an/a
Ardentec 3264.TWOTaiwan$2.36B-30%+32%30%12.3×5.2%+7.7%
Suzhou Nanomicro Technology 688690.SSChina$2.31B+17%+26%25%57.1×35.3%+35.2%
V2X VVXUnited States$2.39B+9%+13%4%11.3×-1.4%+26.3%
TIC Solutions TICUnited States$2.26B+5%+39%-1%n/a51.8%n/a
Shanghai GenTech 688596.SSChina$2.42B+56%+4%2%76.5×n/an/a
S-1 012750.KSSouth Korea$2.45B+14%+1%7%21.8×-1.2%+5.4%
Biocytogen Pharmaceuticals (Beijing) 688796.SSChina$2.22B-19%+40%24%92.6×32.3%+41.1%
KWS SAAT SE & Co KGaA KWS.DEGermany$2.48B-12%-3%15%13.2×-8.2%+4.4%
China Automotive Engineering Research Institute 601965.SSChina$2.18B-8%+12%24%13.2×-5.6%+7.9%
Visional 4194.TJapan$2.51B+32%+24%25%20.2×-2.4%+28.2%
CECEP Environmental Protection 300140.SZChina$2.51B-18%-2%23%n/a-1.2%+26.0%
Firstsource Solutions FSL.NSIndia$2.16B+25%+20%12%22.0×20.3%+13.5%
Sagility SAGILITY.NSIndia$2.15B+2%+28%18%16.4×10.3%+19.5%
Hui Lyu Ecological Technology Groups 001267.SZChina$2.61B-59%+90%10%71.6×n/an/a
International Workplace IWG.LUnited Kingdom$2.63B+12%0%4%22.5×33.6%+3.3%
Huron Consulting HURNUnited States$2.63B+39%+12%12%16.5×-4.0%+14.3%
Pluxee PLX.PAFrance$2.72B0%+1%28%8.9×n/an/a
Anhui XDLK Microsystem 688582.SSChina$1.95B-36%-38%21%37.3×55.7%+37.0%
Heron Neutron Medical 7799.TWTaiwan$1.94B+15%n/a-5,071%380.6×n/an/a
Xi'an Taijin New Energy & Materials Sci-Tech 688813.SSChina$1.93B-13%n/an/an/an/an/a

Questions

Who are Sigurd Microelectronics's main competitors?
Named competitors: ASE Technology Holding (3711.TW), Powertech Technology (6239.TW), ChipMOS Technologies (8150.TW), Ardentec Corporation (3264.TWO). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Ardentec (3264.TWO), Suzhou Nanomicro Technology (688690.SS), V2X (VVX), TIC Solutions (TIC), Shanghai GenTech (688596.SS), S-1 (012750.KS).
Is Sigurd Microelectronics expensive compared with its peers?
On forward p/e it trades at 14.0× against a peer median of 21.8×, 6th cheapest of 18 in its peer set.
How has Sigurd Microelectronics stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -19.0% against +3.1% for the median peer; over one year +69.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.