Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 600717.SS Tianjin Port Holdings Co., Ltd. Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

Tianjin Port Holdings Co., Ltd. Class A600717.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Industrials›Other Transportation

Operator of Tianjin Port, a major North China container and bulk cargo port serving Beijing/Tianjin/Hebei.

Momentum strong 79
Mkt cap
$1.89B
US dollars, full cap
Free float
41%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$17.3M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
+2.2 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
-13 pp
Req g minus delivered
Next earnings
136 days
22 Mar 2027
Close · CNYCN¥4.36
1D0.0%
1W+1.6%
1M0.0%
3M-2.7%
6M-2.5%
YTD-2.5%
1Y-8.6%
ATR %2.1%
52w lowhigh11.9% off high

What Tianjin Port does

Operator of Tianjin Port, a major North China container and bulk cargo port serving Beijing/Tianjin/Hebei.

Charges per-container and per-tonne handling fees, plus storage and related charges, to shipping lines and cargo owners, so earnings follow throughput at Tianjin Port. Bulk cargoes such as ore and coal follow heavy-industry demand, while containers follow manufacturing and trade.

Products and services

  • Container handling
  • Bulk cargo handling

Customers

  • Shipping lines
  • Cargo owners

Where it sits in the supply chain

  • Industrials
  • Transportation infrastructure
  • Port operation

What could go right

  • North China trade volume growth

What could go wrong

  • Trade cyclicality
  • Heavy capex

Moat: narrow (scale). Leading deep-water port serving the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei economic region.

Headquarters: Tianjin, China · Employees: 4,933

Named competitors

Tianjin Port at a glance

Size Tianjin Port (600717.SS) is a China Industrials company (Other Transportation) with a market value of $1.89B, the 1324th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥4.36 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 2.5%, against -2.6% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 11th highest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue fell 8.3% over the last twelve months (peer median +4.5%); the operating margin is 18.2% (peer median 15.7%).

Valuation It trades at 1.5× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 2.9× (5th cheapest of 21).

Price implies For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -15% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -2%, so the hurdle is -13 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.

Capital Return on invested capital runs 2.2 points above its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Next results Next results expected around 22 Mar 2027 (exchange calendar; dates can move).

Relative performance

9010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026600717.SS 98Peer median 98
Six months, rebased to 100: Tianjin Port against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

Tianjin Port financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥11.4BCN¥12.8BCN¥12.1BCN¥11.6BCN¥10.8B
Revenue growth—+6%+4%+8%—
Gross profitCN¥4.89BCN¥3.43BCN¥3.38BCN¥3.05BCN¥2.67B
EBITDAn/aCN¥3.05BCN¥2.94BCN¥2.75BCN¥2.42B
Net incomeCN¥1.17BCN¥981MCN¥994MCN¥982MCN¥740M
Free cash flowCN¥1.89BCN¥1.51BCN¥2.17BCN¥1.75BCN¥1.49B
Capital expenditureCN¥1.48BCN¥1.33BCN¥947MCN¥975MCN¥1.15B
Total debtCN¥3.98BCN¥4.42BCN¥5.09BCN¥5.83BCN¥5.85B

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

Tianjin Port competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%+40%-10%0%+10%WTE002320NS8U9044000089HHFA2645C52FGPSHREEJISPG90480152600020S596000579031601326600717.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. Tianjin Port is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-10%0%+10%0×5×WTE002320NS8U9044HHFA2645C52FGP0008289003SHREEJISPG90486000330152600020S59600057601326600717.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. Tianjin Port is the large dot.

Capital: growth delivered against growth the price implies

0%+20%0%20%WTE002320NS8U0000892645C52FGP000828600033600020S59600717.SSGrowth delivered (Del g) →Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs) →
Above the diagonal = the price needs more growth than the company has been delivering; below = the price already allows for a slowdown. Tianjin Port is the large dot.

Tianjin Port competitors and peer comparison

Head to head with its named competitors (600717.SS vs 601880.SS)
CompanyMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq g
Tianjin Port 600717.SS$1.89B-2%-8%18%1.5×-14.6%
Liaoning Port 601880.SS$4.54B-10%-3%21%3.1×-10.7%

How Tianjin Port compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

Tianjin Port against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure600717.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return0.0%-0.3%11th highest of 21
6-month return-2.5%-2.6%11th highest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-11.9%-15.4%9th highest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)-8.3%+4.5%3rd lowest of 21
Operating margin18.2%15.7%9th highest of 21
EV / Sales1.5×2.9×5th cheapest of 21
Growth the price implies (Req g, 7 yrs)-14.6%-3.7%2nd least demanding of 13
Growth delivered (Del g)-1.6%+5.5%2nd lowest of 13
Hurdle (Req g minus delivered)-13.0 pp-12.2 pp6th least demanding of 13
ROIC minus cost of capital+2.2 pp-0.1 pp8th highest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
Tianjin Port 600717.SSChina$1.89B-2%-8%18%1.5×-14.6%-1.6%
Westshore Terminals Investment WTE.TOCanada$1.90B+16%-16%33%9.0×11.9%-2.6%
Hainan Strait Shipping 002320.SZChina$1.88B-34%+4%23%3.0×-0.5%+36.7%
Hutchison Port Holdings Trust NS8U.SISingapore$1.96B+7%+5%42%3.8×-10.5%+1.7%
NANKAI 9044.TJapan$2.03B0%+7%15%2.8×n/an/a
Shenzhen Airport 000089.SZChina$2.08B-5%+5%17%3.5×-6.4%+11.4%
Hamburger Hafen und Logistik HHFA.DEGermany$1.72B-2%+3%7%1.6×n/an/a
Evergreen Aviation Technologies 2645.TWTaiwan$1.67B-8%+10%17%3.0×-1.0%+11.2%
Comfortdelgro C52.SISingapore$2.19B-10%+9%9%0.8×-8.2%+9.3%
FirstGroup FGP.LUnited Kingdom$1.60B+40%-6%5%0.4×-7.6%+1.9%
Dongguan Development (Holdings) 000828.SZChina$1.57B-3%-4%39%8.3×0.7%+4.4%
Sotetsu 9003.TJapan$1.55B-4%+9%13%2.1×n/an/a
Shreeji Shipping Global SHREEJISPG.NSIndia$1.53B+111%+21%24%19.1×n/an/a
Nagoya Railroad 9048.TJapan$2.38B+8%-2%5%1.6×n/an/a
Fujian Expressway Development 600033.SSChina$1.51B+1%-3%47%4.0×-16.1%+5.6%
Shenzhen International 0152.HKHong Kong$1.49B-35%+15%11%5.8×n/an/a
Henan Zhongyuan Expressway 600020.SSChina$1.43B+5%-11%20%7.3×5.9%+5.4%
SIA Engineering S59.SISingapore$2.51B-10%-3%3%2.1×19.3%+26.3%
Xiamen Xiangyu 600057.SSChina$2.59B-14%+9%1%0.2×n/an/a
Nishi-Nippon Railroad 9031.TJapan$1.37B0%+10%7%1.1×n/an/a
Qinhuangdao Port 601326.SSChina$2.70B-5%+2%23%2.9×-10.9%+2.7%

Questions

Who are Tianjin Port's main competitors?
Named competitors: Liaoning Port (601880.SS). The cockpit's measured peer set (industry) also includes Westshore Terminals Investment (WTE.TO), Hainan Strait Shipping (002320.SZ), Hutchison Port Holdings Trust (NS8U.SI), NANKAI (9044.T), Shenzhen Airport (000089.SZ), Hamburger Hafen und Logistik (HHFA.DE).
Is Tianjin Port expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 1.5× against a peer median of 2.9×, 5th cheapest of 21 in its peer set. For today's price to make sense, revenue must grow about -15% a year for seven years (Req g). Recent delivered growth is -2%, so the hurdle is -13 pp: the price already allows for a slowdown.
How has Tianjin Port stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -2.5% against -2.6% for the median peer; over one year -8.6%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.