Loading…
← CockpitCompetitor Analysis › 600084.SS CITIC Niya Wine Co., Ltd Class AOpen in the cockpit ↗

CITIC Niya Wine Co., Ltd Class A600084.SSCompetitor analysis, valuation and peers

China · CNY·Industrials›Wholesale Distributors
Momentum strong 62
Mkt cap
$701M
US dollars, full cap
Free float
23%
of shares outstanding
$/day
$1.40M
20-day average traded
Fwd P/E
n/m
no positive forecast
ROIC−WACC
-5.5 pp
WACC 5.0%
Hurdle
n/a
no reverse DCF
Close · CNYCN¥4.16
1D+0.2%
1W+2.7%
1M-2.4%
3M-2.4%
6M-22.2%
YTD-20.8%
1Y-26.0%
ATR %3.1%
52w lowhigh48.1% off high

What CITIC Niya Wine does

Employees: 356

CITIC Niya Wine at a glance

Size CITIC Niya Wine (600084.SS) is a China Industrials company (Wholesale Distributors) with a market value of $701M, the 3055th largest of 4,839 China companies the cockpit tracks. Shares closed at CN¥4.16 on 6 Nov 2026.

Performance Over six months the shares fell 22.2%, against -13.5% for the median peer and -16.4% for the China market (cap-weighted) — 6th lowest of 21 in its peer set.

Growth Revenue grew 4.6% over the last twelve months (peer median +8.5%); the operating margin is -17.4% (peer median 5.6%).

Valuation It trades at 28.2× enterprise value to sales against a peer median of 0.9× (most expensive of 21).

Capital Return on invested capital runs 5.5 points below its cost of capital (5.0% WACC).

Relative performance

809010011 May 202611 Aug 20266 Nov 2026Peer median 87600084.SS 82
Six months, rebased to 100: CITIC Niya Wine against the median of its 20 peers (local-currency closes).

CITIC Niya Wine financials

Reported figures in CNY; fiscal year ends 2025-12-31. TTM = trailing twelve months.
TTMFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022
RevenueCN¥163MCN¥112MCN¥150MCN¥195MCN¥137M
Revenue growth—-25%-23%+43%—
Gross profitCN¥91.7MCN¥27.5MCN¥77.6MCN¥81.4MCN¥48.6M
EBITDAn/a-CN¥8.93MCN¥19.8MCN¥20.3M-CN¥885M
Net income-CN¥16.6M-CN¥26.1MCN¥12.1MCN¥3.68M-CN¥883M
Free cash flow-CN¥21.5M-CN¥7.24M-CN¥62.7MCN¥47.1M-CN¥41.1M
Capital expenditureCN¥6.41MCN¥11.1MCN¥17.9MCN¥10.9MCN¥11.1M
Total debtCN¥39.1MCN¥31.1MCN¥44.8MCN¥0CN¥17.1M

Quarterly statements and history in the cockpit →

CITIC Niya Wine competitor charts

The default views of Competitor Analysis ▸ Charts, drawn from the same data. Open them in the cockpit to change the axes, pin companies and read every value.

Performance: 6-month against 1-month return

-20%0%+20%-20%-10%0%6010618117603353000652SGLLV0013160013769824600279MMGR-B9832THEPACOMO688320DBM60098181596033258074600084.SS6-month return →1-month return →
Up and to the right = strong over both horizons. CITIC Niya Wine is the large dot.

Fundamentals: revenue growth against valuation

-20%0%+20%0×10×20×6010618117603353000652SGLLV0013160013769824600279MMGR-BACOMO6883206033258074600084.SSRevenue growth (TTM) →EV / Sales →
Further right = faster growth; higher = more expensive. The dashed lines are the peer medians. CITIC Niya Wine is the large dot.

CITIC Niya Wine competitors and peer comparison

How CITIC Niya Wine compares with its peers

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size. This is the same default set the interactive Competitor Analysis opens with.

CITIC Niya Wine against its 20 peers (data as of 6 Nov 2026)
Measure600084.SSPeer medianRank in peer set
1-month return-2.4%-3.9%6th highest of 21
6-month return-22.2%-13.5%6th lowest of 21
Distance from 52-week high-48.1%-28.8%3rd lowest of 21
Revenue growth (TTM)+4.6%+8.5%8th lowest of 21
Operating margin-17.4%5.6%lowest of 21
EV / Sales28.2×0.9×most expensive of 21
ROIC minus cost of capital-5.5 pp+0.4 pp3rd lowest of 21

Peer table

Peer set: Industry: the same industry and sector in any market, nearest in size
CompanyMarketMarket cap6M returnRevenue growthOp. marginEV / SalesReq gDelivered g
CITIC Niya Wine 600084.SSChina$701M-22%+5%-17%28.2×n/an/a
CITIC Metal 601061.SSChina$706M-32%+19%1%0.1×-22.1%+13.0%
Central Automotive Products 8117.TJapan$716M+7%+14%24%1.7×-3.4%+11.1%
Hunan Heshun Petroleum 603353.SSChina$684M-38%-10%-2%1.7×n/an/a
Tianjin TEDA Resources Recycling 000652.SZChina$683M-27%-66%3%4.2×n/an/a
Ricegrowers SGLLV.AXAustralia$730M+24%-2%6%0.7×-4.4%+12.0%
Lubair Aviation Technology 001316.SZChina$672M-25%+32%20%2.9×-0.8%+11.0%
Jiangxi Bestoo Energy 001376.SZChina$734M-34%+10%22%3.8×-2.1%+17.4%
Senshu Electric 9824.TJapan$736M+17%+13%7%0.5×-5.1%+12.8%
Chongqing Port 600279.SSChina$744M-14%+9%5%2.0×1.5%-2.5%
Momentum MMGR-B.STSweden$650M+14%+6%10%2.2×3.8%+21.2%
Autobacs Seven 9832.TJapan$758M+1%+9%5%0.5×n/an/a
Thermador Groupe THEP.PAFrance$646M-9%+8%12%1.0×-2.4%+4.9%
Acomo ACOMO.ASNetherlands$765M-13%-3%7%0.7×n/an/a
Zhejiang He Chuan Technology 688320.SSChina$638M-15%+45%-10%3.7×n/an/a
Doman Building Materials DBM.TOCanada$633M-1%+2%5%0.6×2.0%+14.1%
Jiangsu Soho High Hope 600981.SSChina$780M-19%+2%0%0.3×31.9%+8.5%
Tachibana Eletech 8159.TJapan$629M+43%+10%4%0.4×3.0%+7.1%
Shanghai Bloom Technology 603325.SSChina$628M-19%-34%14%3.2×n/an/a
Yuasa 8074.TJapan$789M-1%+5%3%0.2×-14.7%+4.7%
Harim 003380.KSSouth Korea$790M-16%+10%7%0.9×-2.2%+11.3%

Questions

Which companies are CITIC Niya Wine's closest peers?
The cockpit's peer set: CITIC Metal (601061.SS), Central Automotive Products (8117.T), Hunan Heshun Petroleum (603353.SS), Tianjin TEDA Resources Recycling (000652.SZ), Ricegrowers (SGLLV.AX), Lubair Aviation Technology (001316.SZ), Jiangxi Bestoo Energy (001376.SZ), Senshu Electric (9824.T).
Is CITIC Niya Wine expensive compared with its peers?
On ev / sales it trades at 28.2× against a peer median of 0.9×, most expensive of 21 in its peer set.
How has CITIC Niya Wine stock performed?
Over six months to 6 Nov 2026 the shares returned -22.2% against -13.5% for the median peer; over one year -26.0%.

How these numbers are made. Returns are close-to-close in local currency. Revenue growth and margins are trailing twelve months. Req g is the revenue growth that today's enterprise value requires for seven years at the company's own cost of capital; Delivered g is what it actually grew; the gap is the hurdle (honest precision about ±8 points, so read the ranking more than the decimal). No fair values, price targets or analyst ratings are shown, by design. Method and validation.